Exactly my thoughts C.Sporting boss Amorim being strongly linked with the Man Utd post. Not difficult to imagine he'd want Vik.
If he moves to Manure they may want him but I'd be surprised if any deal would be done till the summer. Plus Vik may receive an offer from a much better club than Manure.Exactly my thoughts C.
I don't think Vik would want to drop down a level, especially now he's playing champions league football at Sporting.Sporting boss Amorim being strongly linked with the Man Utd post. Not difficult to imagine he'd want Vik.
Money talks, if he's doubling his wages he would go, ask CH.I don't think Vik would want to drop down a level, especially now he's playing champions league football at Sporting.
I’m little surprised that they’d be able to afford him tbh.Money talks, if he's doubling his wages he would go, ask CH.
may make the preservesI hope it doesn't get into a pickle. I think Vik can cut the mustard in the Prem.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
60-70m would only give us £3-4m. Not the windfall some were hopingProbably the first very strong source on any Vik move since going to Sporting. Would be surprised if it was less than the 70m which should net us around 4-5m
View attachment 39076
Was never going to go for the release clause. 60-70m from playing in that league is much more realistic. It’s still a nice amount of money to have60-70m would only give us £3-4m. Not the windfall some were hoping
If that's the list of clubs interested you'd think they could push the price up a bit - see Mudryk lolWas never going to go for the release clause. 60-70m from playing in that league is much more realistic. It’s still a nice amount of money to have
Not much compared to the 4.5m we spunked up the wall on EMC.60-70m would only give us £3-4m. Not the windfall some were hoping
Isn't it 10% of the fee?60-70m would only give us £3-4m. Not the windfall some were hoping
believe it's 10% of profitIsn't it 10% of the fee?
It’s what he pays his agent for.A bidding war would be nice... All the noise was around PSG 2 weeks ago, Man City last week and United this week! All have stronger 'links' than Arsenal did in the summer as well.
Minus 20 + mill before the calculation.Isn't it 10% of the fee?
believe it's 10% of profit
And if I’m not mistaken Sporting ‘bought back’ a portion of that over the summer. I’d expect it’s now 5% of profit.
And if I’m not mistaken Sporting ‘bought back’ a portion of that over the summer. I’d expect it’s now 5% of profit.
Isn’t it the buying club who pay agents fees?It’s what he pays his agent for.
No its 15% down to 10%
They paid off extra clauses early to get it down from 15% to 10%. I think it was because they weren't sure he was sticking around in the summer.And if I’m not mistaken Sporting ‘bought back’ a portion of that over the summer. I’d expect it’s now 5% of profit.
Even if Utd don’t sign him I think it makes it likely he leaves anyway.He isn't going to sigh Vik
They already have enough attacking options that would score loads in the Sporting Club team and united have other weakness they need to address first
Vik's agent was very clear he moved him there for Amorim but I'm not sure it will be a major factor at this point. It sounds like Vik wanted to go in the summer anyway and so again it will be about whether anyone meets Sporting's valuation and how far Vik pushes it.Even if Utd don’t sign him I think it makes it likely he leaves anyway.
yeah he's leaving in the summer, be interesting what the fee will be though as i think Nunez may have made people wary about strikers that score tons there.Even if Utd don’t sign him I think it makes it likely he leaves anyway.
I think I read somewhere Man City have £100mil knocking about for attacking option in January. Alvarez left and they haven’t replaced him.He isn't going to sigh Vik
They already have enough attacking options that would score loads in the Sporting Club team and united have other weakness they need to address first
I thought they’d paid an extra amount to further reduce it. The article doesn’t read that way though so happy to accept I may be mistaken.
Sporting won't sell in January, they won't be able to replace him. They'll sell in the summer as it is far easier to bring in players to replace anyone they sell in the summer window.I think I read somewhere Man City have £100mil knocking about for attacking option in January. Alvarez left and they haven’t replaced him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?