I think Adams is superb, Sheffers tackling ability is not that vital. Does he agree that the Ref gave them almost everything !
I took an Oldham supporting friend to the match yesterday (as I had a spare ST) his views were:
First half best player on the park: Fleck and was delighted he was subbed
McSheffrey: couldn't believe he was ever a £4.5m player as he can't tackle
Biggest disagreement: I thought Adams was superb he thought he was defensively suspect
Promotion prospects: he thinks we'll make the playoffs but not sure about promotion
Do these views resonate with anyone?
Not really.
Fleck was poor average at best, Jennings and Adams our way players first half
Sheff is nowhere near the player we sold to Birmingham, if he was still that same player he wouldn't be playing for us in league one. Some fans need to get over that fact.
Adams was one of our best players yesterday.
On this one I think I'd trust the Oldham view rather than someone who has a vendetta...
McSheffrey: couldn't believe he was ever a £4.5m player as he can't tackle
McSheffrey has never been able to tackle. Can Michael Owen tackle? Berbatov? McShuff isn't in the team to tackle.
Hold on, so your friends criteria for a player to be worth £4.5million+ is that he can tackle?! I'm not sure Brum got him for his tackling ability!
First half best player on the park: Fleck and was delighted he was subbed -
Disagree. Don't think Fleck was as bad as some have said on here, but he was certainly hit and miss. Jennings was best player first half.
McSheffrey: couldn't believe he was ever a £4.5m player as he can't tackle
McSheffrey has never been able to tackle. Can Michael Owen tackle? Berbatov? McShuff isn't in the team to tackle.
Biggest disagreement: I thought Adams was superb he thought he was defensively suspect
Promotion prospects: he thinks we'll make the playoffs but not sure about promotion
Thought Adams was excellent. Hardly saw a player of theirs get past him all afternoon.
Ref was a bit of a joke. He booked their centre forward, who then went on to commit at least another 4 fouls on Edge. Some of his decision making was quite awful.
Hold on, so your friends criteria for a player to be worth £4.5million+ is that he can tackle?! I'm not sure Brum got him for his tackling ability!
On this one I think I'd trust the Oldham view rather than someone who has a vendetta...
Only because he's agreeing with your pro-fleck/anti-sheff vendetta.
Who did you think was the best player in the first half?
I thought Jennings had his best 45 minutes since joining.
Amazing that you established his criteria from my reporting his quote...
The point he made was...there has been some considerable decline in his playing standard in a relatively short time.
Only because he's agreeing with your pro-fleck/anti-sheff vendetta.
Who did you think was the best player in the first half?
Not at all, I thought Sheff played ok, I have since praised him on the assists front.
The people I sat with were in agreement he was playing well, including an anti-Flecker. Thing is, I can admit when Sheff plays well, you can't admit Fleck plays well when he plays well, that's the difference.
I took an Oldham supporting friend to the match yesterday (as I had a spare ST) his views were:
First half best player on the park: Fleck and was delighted he was subbed
McSheffrey: couldn't believe he was ever a £4.5m player as he can't tackle
Biggest disagreement: I thought Adams was superb he thought he was defensively suspect
Promotion prospects: he thinks we'll make the playoffs but not sure about promotion
With respect, Couldn't care less what he thinks
The 18 goals he scored from midfield in Birmingham City's promotion winning season probably paid for itself.
Not sure it was actually 4.5 million
Paul Scholes can't tackle.
A lot of people from Coventry don't like him, Blues fans do. Make your own mind up.
*cue the Mcsheffrey haters*
I had a couple of Irish fellas sat behind me at the game who obviously hadn't been for a while since they referred to Coventry players by their numbers.
Just before half-time they said 10 (Fleck) was a quality player, rarely wastes a pass. Also said the big lad up front, 15, was working hard & making the runs but the service to him was poor.
Also a personal view on McSheffrey, the role he plays in our system absolutely requires him to tackle. To say otherwise displays poor tactical knowledge. One of two things happen when McSheffrey attempts a tackle, either a free-kick to them or he falls over and they carry on unaffected. His job when we don't have the ball is to protect Adams from the opposition fullback joining the attack. He has never added this to his game after several managers have said he needs to. He failed to track two or three runs yesterday.
Ok fair enough, why did Sheff get a 7 though? 1 good cross and I am strugglingAs soon as he plays well, I will hold my hand up and said he played well.
He was average yesterday, I gave him a 5 only 1 mark less than you did. 1 decent shot and a couple of good passes. And everyone around me were saying he needed to go off at half time.
The best he's played was vs Shrewsbury first half playing deep, when he had little pressure put on him so he can pick a pass, but he is too defensively weak to play that deep.
Clarke was our worse player yesterdayReally don't think Clarke was all that impressive actually, though I seem to be in the minority here. Both full backs were good going forward, Bailey had a strong game and Jennings seemed in better shape.
Clarke was our worse player yesterday
Agreed about the full backs was well pleased with how much they tried to overlap and tried to run past there wide player
To be fair McSheffrey does get bigged up because he is from cov! Our most dangerous player is usually the phrase used! Yes in some games he does run at players and tranmere first half he really did but no end product! He seems a bit too greedy sometimes.
his crossing and passing is amazing one minute then stupidly overhit the next.
Ok fair enough, why did Sheff get a 7 though? 1 good cross and I am struggling
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?