Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
The truth is somewhere in the middle, usually. Yet the extremes get the coverage most of the time sadly.
But then maybe the other side were right all along.
You and your IRA splinter group should go over there and sort them out.
Footage just released from a drone just north of kiyv of a large Russian tank convoy, perhaps 40-50 tanks, being attacked . Lots of tanks blown up, the rest retreating. Incredible.
Basically we should have just kept the original EU laws instead of fucking around with it in 2018 giving the HOL’s the option to “take back control”. Liz Truss also specifically blamed 2 individuals in the HOL’s for amendments, not sure they have the power on their own. Liz Truss even admitted that the EU law was less onerous.I might be wrong but I think the legislation made the legal requirements messier
he claims he’s already getting involved but will not tell us how
I assume he's the bloke driving around eastern green with a wonky pray for ukraine sticker on the back of his car.
I'm not sure he was even talking about nukes, his threat was something like "consequences the world has never seen before". We've already seen nukes dropped over Japan, and the devastating impact even a small nuke can cause. Something like an EMP could send us back to the stone age for years to come. Maybe they've developed a new weapon, that makes the tsar bomba have the same impact as a child throwing a rock. Maybe he's just talking shite to continue to portray his macho image.
Something doesn't feel right about the whole thing though. The Russians look incompetent so far but is it just a ploy to bring in the west before they unleash the full force.
The independent is one of the most reliable press in the world according to international news watch dog News Guard.
The Independent is awarded 100% trust rating by media watchdog NewsGuard
Media standards organisation assesses thousands of news outlets around the world for trustworthinesswww.independent.co.uk
Gina Miller i will give you.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I suspect he’s just a mental old man losing the plot TBH. This all sounds a lot like people excusing Johnson or Cummings because they had an aura around them that actually was completely unjustified.
No way have the Russians got some mad new tech and we don’t know about it. Neither are they likely to be playing possum before they hit the button and reanimate Lenin. Occam’s Razor suggests they are what they look like: a creaking superpower rotten with corruption with a flimsy economy and a man in charge who is losing his faculties.
Isn't that how all the top secret agents operate?he claims he’s already getting involved but will not tell us how
Line in the sand was supposed to be crossing into NATO.Some people may get their wish
Chemical weapon use may be ‘red line’ to provoke Western involvement in Ukraine
White House warns Moscow using ‘false flag’ allegations as smokescreen for chemical attackswww.independent.co.uk
We've had a story in the press here (last week??) that's there's been a crackdown in Russia as a lot of the money supposed to be spent on weapons,logistics etc has disappeared. The military resources have not matched what they were supposed to be on paper.I think what's clear (and the same will apply to other military powers) is that nobody can afford to invest the amount of money you need to maintain the sort of firepower people like to imagine you've got, it's just impractical, and, in any case, there will be money being creamed off all over the place.
The issue with chemical weapons is it's often a slow, painful death long after the event itself. Sure, they exist with 'normal' weapons too, but not to the same extent.Line in the sand was supposed to be crossing into NATO.
Abhorrent as chemical etc weapons are they any worse than civilian bombing deaths? The manner of death is different but the end result is the same. Are chemical weapons any less indiscriminate than bombing civilian areas?
Not sure I've put this properly (intention certainly not to be callous) but as far as NATO goes atm does it matter how they die? There's evidence of thermobaric weapons being used which result in a nasty death - but that hasn't changed NATO's stance. But again Syria's use of chemical weapons did produce a response - would they be consistent or "factor" in who the opponent is this time?
00Day?Isn't that how all the top secret agents operate?
Is it still owned by Lebedev?
Not sure if he is O. Could be A. Or maybe even B.00Day?
I think what's clear (and the same will apply to other military powers) is that nobody can afford to invest the amount of money you need to maintain the sort of firepower people like to imagine you've got, it's just impractical, and, in any case, there will be money being creamed off all over the place.
Assets frozen including Chelsea
Completely agree, which says an awful lot about the moral abyss football has fallen into.
If only the game had some kind of governing body who could make a stand on it, some sort of test for fit and proper ownership...
Who knows, CD, maybe this will start the changes required, but I won't hold my breath.
Thats surely Russian propaganda. Just had a look on twitter and it hasn't been reported by any credible source that I can see, and the diagram and narrative seems to have come from a Russian source.Is it true that Ukranian neo nazi's are using civilians as human shields?
Utter scumbags, they should be expelled from the country.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I think I agreeUtter scumbags, they should be expelled from the country.
Got friends in UK who have raised over 50k plus vans loads of goods. Supposed to have left in a convoy last weekend but have had to repack everything into boxes by country of origin to get through customs. Going to be double the work when they get to Poland sorting it back into what supplies actualy need grouping together etc.
Got friends in UK who have raised over 50k plus vans loads of goods. Supposed to have left in a convoy last weekend but have had to repack everything into boxes by country of origin to get through customs. Going to be double the work when they get to Poland sorting it back into what supplies actualy need grouping together etc.
That's one way of spinning it, I guess.You would have thought the EU would have waived restrictions but the Brexit obsession continues with Macron and his sad cronies
The EU doesn't buy gas as a bloc.I do also owe everyone an apology - I mistakenly said that the EU were feeding Mr Purtin $2 million a week to pay for energy to help fuel his war - this was a disgraceful misrepresentation - it is $1 million A DAY
The EU doesn't buy gas as a bloc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?