How do you knowWell yeah, that’s the point. The Ukraine counteroffensive was seen as a massive failure and the Russian Kharkiv offensive seen as a great success, even though they’re basically the same.
The Russian counteroffensive being labelled a success is something he’s invented.How do you know
How do you know
The Russian counteroffensive being labelled a success is something he’s invented.
I said back in July last year the war is a stalemate. At the time it was weirdly seen as pro-Russian but now not so much.You were crowing about Russian advances and there were numerous doomsday stories in the media about Russian advances.
Weird, you were ‘crowing’ about how fabulous it was for America only days ago.It is, however, allowing them to do this. Just disgusting.
Weird, you were ‘crowing’ about how fabulous it was for America only days ago.
I said back in July last year the war is a stalemate. At the time it was weirdly seen as pro-Russian but now not so much.
Oh dear.I've said all along it's a fantastic way of severely weakening an enemy without losing a single US life so I don't really know what point you're trying to make.
At the time it was seen as being pro-Russian and for saying the counter-offensive was a failure. Both are reported by the likes of the BBC now.I don’t think suggesting it’s a stalemate was seen as pro-Russian. More the comments that Ukraine should cede territory and get on with their lives.
I’d suggest most know the fighting is at a stalemate now but signing a portion of Ukraine over to Russia previously has worked wonders hasn’t it.
Oh dear.
I don’t think suggesting it’s a stalemate was seen as pro-Russian. More the comments that Ukraine should cede territory and get on with their lives.
I’d suggest most know the fighting is at a stalemate now but signing a portion of Ukraine over to Russia previously has worked wonders hasn’t it.
Wow, you’re so intelligent.Yeah because I'm definitely saying there it's fantastic that Russia are bombing innocent people. Fucking hell.
Ok let me break it down for you, as you seem to be struggling.
You and Grendelov have said all along that the US is only in it for themselves and is fighting a proxy war.
I agree, to an extent.
If you think the US is fighting a proxy war against Russia (and clearly they are), then severely damaging their army and capability without losing a single US life is clearly incredibly effective and advantageous for them.
I mean it's really not difficult.
Wow, you’re so intelligent.
It’s pretty obvious, thanks, but I wouldn’t exactly describe it as “fantastic”.
It’s also clearly not just against Russia, as I’ve mentioned before.
The conflict is clearly not just against Russia; in reality it’s a wider conflict with other countries trying to overcome western dominance.Fantastic from the point of view of the US vs Russia, obviously.
It's not difficult. You've said it yourself.
But when I say it I'm a 'vile c**t'. Absolutely pathetic
Your comprehension skills are as impressive as your buddy's then.
Fantastic from the point of view of the US vs Russia, obviously.
It's not difficult. You've said it yourself.
But when I say it I'm a 'vile c**t'. Absolutely pathetic
The conflict is clearly not just against Russia; in reality it’s a wider conflict with other countries trying to overcome western dominance.
It’s also easy for Russia to highlight western double standards with what’s going on elsewhere in the world.
and you accuse others of comprehension issuesThat's fine, but nothing to do with the point being made, where you called me a vile c**t for saying the same thing as you.
I’ve never described American foreign policy with a country and its people as collateral as “fantastic”.That's fine, but nothing to do with the point being made, where you called me a vile c**t for saying the same thing as you.
I’ve never described American foreign policy with a country and its people as collateral as “fantastic”.
I’ve never described American foreign policy with a country and its people as collateral as “fantastic”.
You said Putin had played a blinder.
PVA has said this US foreign policy opportunity is fantastic.
Can we just accept both terms used are in a purely subjective (from the perception of the ‘party’ involved) manner and neither mean anything in the grand scheme of things?
…I would do if he hadn’t been used to label me pro-Russian, despite calling Putin a c**t.You said Putin had played a blinder.
PVA has said this US foreign policy opportunity is fantastic.
Can we just accept both terms used are in a purely subjective (from the perception of the ‘party’ involved) manner and neither mean anything in the grand scheme of things?
You said Putin had played a blinder.
PVA has said this US foreign policy opportunity is fantastic.
Can we just accept both terms used are in a purely subjective (from the perception of the ‘party’ involved) manner and neither mean anything in the grand scheme of things?
Indeed. Clearly I wasn't describing the deaths of innocent civilians as 'fantastic'.
And therein lies why conceding territory is pointless. Putin will just come back for more at a later date, especially as he would see Ukraine doing so as them being weak and embolden him.Unless the West actively gets involved in the war, there’s little chance of Ukraine reclaiming lost territory. That’s not even considering the territory lost in 2014.
And therein lies why conceding territory is pointless. Putin will just come back for more at a later date, especially as he would see Ukraine doing so as them being weak and embolden him.
Anyone who thinks a ceasefire with Ukraine ceding territory will bring an end to the killing it won't. It will just defer it for a few years.
Ultimately it’s not up to Ukraine though and will be decided by the West. There’s next to no chance of them getting Crimea back without a full scale war with other countries getting involved, which isn’t going to happen.I agree with this. Unfortunately I also think that the only way to end this in the short term will be a negotiated settlement.
If it’s a negotiated settlement that included Ukraine territory then it would have to be alongside Ukraine joining nato so any future incursion would be against a nato member. Another option could be to suggest to Putin something like, return to pre 2022 and agreement for Ukraine not to join nato unless there is a future incursion - can’t see him going for this currently though. It also requires Ukraine to cede Crimea which I’m not sure they’re willing to do
Any settlement proposal would have to be Ukraines call. These type of solutions would all depend on how strong/weak both sides feel and what appetite they have for continued war and loss of life (let’s be honest Putin doesn’t give a shit)
Ultimately it’s not up to Ukraine though and will be decided by the West. There’s next to no chance of them getting Crimea back without a full scale war with other countries getting involved, which isn’t going to happen.
The population of Ukraine is overwhelmingly against ceding any territory to Russia as part of any peace talks.
Totally understandable, but probably impractical particularly if western support dries up post elections.The population of Ukraine is overwhelmingly against ceding any territory to Russia as part of any peace talks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?