civilians killed but it was right thing to do apparently.
bad world.
I thought people wanted action against Assad though?
Aren't the people of Syria being attacked by Assad and ISIS?
i dont have a clue whats going on mate. i wouldnt be surprised if their is foul play going on from russia and usa. all i know is its a shame innocentrs dying at the hands of both sides.
you ever seen newsroom? they talked about saren gas use on that, horrible to see it in real life. disgusting
agree on military base point
I thought people wanted action against Assad though?
Aren't the people of Syria being attacked by Assad and ISIS?
From what I can see, either:
1) The Chemical attack was real and Trump just delivered repercussions for breaking international laws.
Or
2) It was fake (not done by Assad at least) and the White Helmets/rebels/Isis tricked the US into attacking another nation.
Or
3) The USA orchestrated it to give them an excuse to attack Syria.
Or
4) The Syrian Airforce bombed a terrorist chemical manufacturing plant and their human shields got caught up in the release of chemicals.
The Syrian state and Russia are saying number 4 from what I can see, The USA are saying number 1. Personally, I don't have a clue, but I still cannot understand why Assad would do this. Syrian state media are also saying civilian children were killed in the USA airstrike on the airbase. Personally I think that's bullshit. How many airbases employ children? Standard propaganda.
This is really fucked up.
Who was it who died?
1 or 4 imo. The way the gas attack has been covered in the media, I can't imagine it being fake or staged by the USA.
I agree.
Sorry, should have cleared up my previous post. When I say 'fake', I mean faked to make it look like it was him, rather than it actually not happening at all.
The whole thing is a real mess. They have to defeat ISIS first and foremost and then look at Assad if they want him out of power. If they take/took him too early then ISIS could have got a strong foothold in the country. After they've sorted Syria there will be the Kurds kicking off for independance. They've been fighting ISIS in the hope that that they get their own country too (turkey dont want this) so it's going to rumble on for years to come. Meanwhile the main cause of it all is thinking of standing again on an anti Brexit campaign.
i assume you're referring to blair? It started long before him mate, he, and his mate bush, just threw petrol and a few gas canisters onto the fire.
I disagree,Bush snr went in for the first Iraq war and it seemed to put Saddam back in his box so to speak. Bush Jr and Blair then went in all guns blazing, upset the status quo and we are still dealing with it 20 years later both in the middle east and at home. Assad, Saddam and Gaddafi were in power and kept a lid on everything with their own brand of tyrrany, but, whist they did this there were less people dying. All hell has been breaking loose for the last 2 decades with no real end in sight.
As soon as Saddam went, the whole area exploded. Like you say It's been bubbling for decades but the tyrants kept it in check. Sadly the conflicts over the last 20 years have proven that they should have remained in power despite how evil they were and still are.
Hate that shit, where video's play automatically, sounds/looks horrific, I've not seen it myself and don't want to either as I dislike having them sorts of images floating around my head :bored:Unfortunately I saw the video on facebook. It started playing with out me clicking play, and it's a horrific video to see people suffering and dying in that gas attack
No win situation really isn't it. Remove a tyrant, thousands of innocent people get killed. Keep the tyrant in power, thousands of people get killed by said tyrant.
Hate that shit, where video's play automatically, sounds/looks horrific, I've not seen it myself and don't want to either as I dislike having them sorts of images floating around my head :bored:
To be fair, they attacked a military base today, in 2017, not "Syria".
It wasn't a bombing, it was 59 cruise missiles. And they deserved what they got.US bombing in Syria
So if Russia attacked an RAF base in Britain, they only attacked a military base, not "Britain"?
It wasn't a bombing, it was 59 cruise missiles. And they deserved what they got.
Just in Iraq eh?Sorry, was a poor title.
You're correct, bombing suggests random attacking. Something I don't believe is happening in Syria by the US/UK etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?