Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Updated CCFC lowest ever league attendences (6 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Jack Griffin
  • Start date Nov 26, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

bezzer

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #106
bigfatronssba said:
Statistically this is the worst team since 1963.
Click to expand...

In what way?
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #107
As much as I dislike much of what Grendel posts, I must agree that FFP is worthless. The football league have proved they have no power. What is going to have changed? They have agreed to allow us in to this situation they can't then punish us for it as well.

FFP will not work. I will be the first to admit I am wrong if it does. However it won't.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #108
James Smith said:
Whilst I don't rate their chances in the Judicial Review Application hearing tomorrow, I'd bet that SISU would find a way round the FPP.
Click to expand...

Can't see it dear chap. My money was on a left-hand-right-hand shuffle of cash within SISU group companies with regards shirt sponsorship overly-inflating turnover by a record deal only being returned to group in 'management charges', but that hasn't happened.

This is a hot UEFA potato, instigated and coordinated by Platini himself; and the FA will have to be seen to be applying rigidly, as the FA isn't exactly popular with it's European 'friends'. So, I can see the FA coming down hard on clubs such as ours, to look tough whilst ignoring the dalliances of the big cheeses
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #109
lewys33 said:
As much as I dislike much of what Grendel posts, I must agree that FFP is worthless. The football league have proved they have no power. What is going to have changed? They have agreed to allow us in to this situation they can't then punish us for it as well.

FFP will not work. I will be the first to admit I am wrong if it does. However it won't.
Click to expand...

We were in transfer embargo. Now we are in 'rolling embargo'. Surely that's already prevented or curtailed our activity? Even Fisher has admitted it has.

Why won't FFP be equally, or even more rigidly, enforced?
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #110
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Quite true. It's like the 'your, you're, you are' issue.

For example, if I were to assert: 'AndreasB, you're a fanny', I'd make sure I got the grammar spot-on
Click to expand...

U R a big fanny mate
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #111
italiahorse said:
Are you the Samaritans ?
Click to expand...


Ha ha...


No, the Samaritans are a great organisation who generally deal with people who have REAL problems & REAL issues in the REAL world....

.....not a load of drama queens on an internet forum who spend all day, every day, girly bitching & moaning about a 3rd division football team & their big bad owners.....


boo hoo hoo....
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #112
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Can't see it dear chap. My money was on a left-hand-right-hand shuffle of cash within SISU group companies with regards shirt sponsorship overly-inflating turnover by a record deal only being returned to group in 'management charges', but that hasn't happened.

This is a hot UEFA potato, instigated and coordinated by Platini himself; and the FA will have to be seen to be applying rigidly, as the FA isn't exactly popular with it's European 'friends'. So, I can see the FA coming down hard on clubs such as ours, to look tough whilst ignoring the dalliances of the big cheeses
Click to expand...


Unfortunately, I think you're right there. Although it may get to the point where you've got 72 clubs all under a transfer embargo!
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #113
AndreasB said:
U R a big fanny mate
Click to expand...

That's an insult. Mine was only a grammatical hypothesis. I think that makes you a bad person, and me someone who merely seeks to further the wisdom of others
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #114
AndreasB said:
U R a big fanny mate
Click to expand...

More likely a Fanny Buddy or even more Likely Fanny Lover.
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #115
wingy said:
More likely a Fanny Buddy or even more Likely Fanny Lover.
Click to expand...

Yep couldn't possibly be female and not a Lesbian, you feckwit.
 
Last edited by a moderator: Nov 27, 2013

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #116
AndreasB said:
Yep couldn't possibly be female and not a Lesbian, you feckwit.
Click to expand...

never met you Andreas but you sound about 14.
 
Last edited by a moderator: Nov 27, 2013
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #117
SIR ERNIE said:
never met you Andreas but you sound about 14.
Click to expand...

Is that what they call grooming? You should be careful doing stuff like that.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #118
SIR ERNIE said:
never met you Andreas but you sound about 14.
Click to expand...

This poster is a strange one. Sounded quite reasoned at first. Normally wrong, but wrong-with-justification if you understand what I mean. Lost a few debates, then turned into a parody. Now just foolish and rude.

Kind of followed the Grenduffy mould; but a more concentrated iteration
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #119
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
This poster is a strange one. Sounded quite reasoned at first. Normally wrong, but wrong-with-justification if you understand what I mean. Lost a few debates, then turned into a parody. Now just foolish and rude.

Kind of followed the Grenduffy mould; but a more concentrated iteration
Click to expand...

I note the complete up your arse arrogance of you to pigeonhole people you don't agree with - apparently I am "normally wrong" - well I would be in the opinion of the vast majority of bleating sheep on this board. You all get SO cross.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #120
AndreasB said:
I note the complete up your arse arrogance of you to pigeonhole people you don't agree with - apparently I am "normally wrong" - well I would be in the opinion of the vast majority of bleating sheep on this board. You all get SO cross.
Click to expand...

Is that irony? I see the angst in your opening that you scoff as you sign off. Maybe you're just not cut out for this type of thing?
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #121
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Is that irony? I see the angst in your opening that you scoff as you sign off. Maybe you're just not cut out for this type of thing?
Click to expand...

Nah. suits me fine thanks.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #122
AndreasB said:
Yep couldn't possibly be female and not a Lesbian, you fuckwit.
Click to expand...

As its focused on MMM who's history on here confirms him as male ,if I wish to insert an attempt at humour I will regardless of your pathetic attempt to insult.

Scratch and smell ,I bet you reek of fish and thats not Grendels version........http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyItREx0VbQ
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #123
AndreasB said:
Nah. suits me fine thanks.
Click to expand...

Does it? Remember; in life when you see people laughing - well, sometimes it's at you, not with you
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #124
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Does it? Remember; in life when you see people laughing - well, sometimes it's at you, not with you
Click to expand...

Yes I can a imagine a few on here, pointing their fat, grimy fingers, tongue hanging out, drooling and laughing at me.
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #125
AndreasB said:
Yes I can a imagine a few on here, pointing their fat, grimy fingers, tongue hanging out, drooling and laughing at me.
Click to expand...

That'll be your boyfriend tim then.
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #126
valiant15 said:
That'll be your boyfriend tim then.
Click to expand...

There we go, right on cue.Took about 5 minutes before the first knuckle dragger appeared with the usual meaningless Fisher insult. Still, at least it was not quite as bad as the rape/homophobic ones of the other day.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #127
stop arguing people, makes me sad.
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #128
covcity4life said:
stop arguing people, makes me sad.
Click to expand...

Sorry. Its my fault I think. I have been provoking people.
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #129
AndreasB said:
There we go, right on cue.Took about 5 minutes before the first knuckle dragger appeared with the usual meaningless Fisher insult. Still, at least it was not quite as bad as the rape/homophobic ones of the other day.
Click to expand...
You appear to be on a one woman mission to wind every one up on this forum.

You give it out then cry when you get it back.

I seriously think you have issues.
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #130
AndreasB said:
oh but you can still go away though, you thick twit.
Click to expand...

Is it time of the month sweetheart?
 
Last edited by a moderator: Nov 27, 2013
S

swisstony

New Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #131
What a marvellous command of the English language you have!!!
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #132
valiant15 said:
Is it time of the month sweetheart?
Click to expand...

lovely stuff
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #133
AndreasB said:
lovely stuff
Click to expand...

Anytime.
 
S

SkyBlueCharlie

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #134
AndreasB said:
Nah. suits me fine thanks.
Click to expand...

Should that not be that be a capital 'S' after the full stop? Just asking as you seem to so hot on correcting other people's grammar.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #135
blimey, never seen a flame war where i was not involved.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #136
bezzer said:
In what way?
Click to expand...

In that every team inbetween has been in a higher position.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #137
lewys33 said:
As much as I dislike much of what Grendel posts, I must agree that FFP is worthless. The football league have proved they have no power. What is going to have changed? They have agreed to allow us in to this situation they can't then punish us for it as well.

FFP will not work. I will be the first to admit I am wrong if it does. However it won't.
Click to expand...

Your right that the Football League has no real legal power. However if we end up in a situation where we beat other clubs to staying up/making play offs do you really think the chairmen of other clubs are just going to sit back and take it?

No they will be threatening the league with legal action left, right and centre. The league can try and ignore the problem if they want, but other chairmen wont, and shouldn't.
 
A

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #138
SkyBlueCharlie said:
Should that not be that be a capital 'S' after the full stop? Just asking as you seem to so hot on correcting other people's grammar.
Click to expand...

No. It was a comma. Next!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #139
bigfatronssba said:
Your right that the Football League has no real legal power. However if we end up in a situation where we beat other clubs to staying up/making play offs do you really think the chairmen of other clubs are just going to sit back and take it?

No they will be threatening the league with legal action left, right and centre. The league can try and ignore the problem if they want, but other chairmen wont, and shouldn't.
Click to expand...

They cannot take legal action if the League rules are worded properly. No club would ever take the League to court forget it.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #140
Grendel said:
They cannot take legal action if the League rules are worded properly. No club would ever take the League to court forget it.
Click to expand...

So what was the point in destroying the clubs Championship status for a rule that won't be enforced?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?