Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Tyson Fury (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Sky_Blue_Daz
  • Start date Sep 17, 2011
Forums New posts

Sky_Blue_Daz

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2011
  • #1
Not a bad fight, thought it got stopped early
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
  • Sep 19, 2011
  • #2
Tyson looks a really good fighter. I've seen all of his matches and it's good to see him up against some real boxers now instead of Journeymen. Thought he was one to watch way back when I first saw him. Will he ever be as good as Klitchcko's though? I doubt it.
 

johnniericoh

Member
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #3
I am a bit concerned, as with most British heavies past and present, that TG despite his enormous physical advantages ie 18 stone and 6' 8" does not really punch his weight as he should when compared to most of the USA heavies.

Possible exception is Lennox who laid a few out with devastating shots.

I also like TG and he is still only 23 with plenty to learn and as most heavies reach boxing maturity in their mid/late thirties he could if kept out of trouble have a long career ahead.

PUSB
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #4
TF you mean :facepalm:. Having watched all of his fights I have to disagree. He is a young fighter going into fights to build experience. In his first few fights he banged them out pretty quick, but now he is looking for ringtime and boxing. I think he has only gone the distance once so far in his career. This is down to his abitility to punch hard, real hard.
 

johnniericoh

Member
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #5
Sorry Rich geting my TF (Tyson Fury) mixed up with TG (TYson Gay - athlete)

I agree with what you say and providing he's not rushed and mismatched (in the case of the Klitchkos) he should dominate what is a piss poor heavyweight division.

I can't believe that the yanks have almost given up providing any credible opposition compared to 5/10/15 years ago - the lucrative rewards are still there so where are the budding Tysons, Holifields etc - it really does puxzzle me.

PUSB
 

Il Pirata

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #6
johnniericoh said:
I am a bit concerned, as with most British heavies past and present, that TG despite his enormous physical advantages ie 18 stone and 6' 8" does not really punch his weight as he should when compared to most of the USA heavies.

Possible exception is Lennox who laid a few out with devastating shots.
Click to expand...
So basically those of African origin are heavier hitters, 'tis what you're saying?

The US heavyweight division is full of chumps now, anyway.
 

johnniericoh

Member
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #7
il Pirata,

No that's not what I am saying - I just think the boxing style is different as in more offensive with big combinations and mighty clumps whereas us Brits tend to rely on the classic British "jab"and tendency to box for a points result.

PUSB
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?