if the parkin deal collapsed, how come the turner one didn't? why were they mutually exclusive?
i didn't want parkin but surely we could have haggled for more money seeing as he isn't a part of the deal anymore?
mong negotiators
Exactly what I have been saying, but people just respond we don't need him we have Nathan Cameron or something stupid along those lines.a club with half a brain would have kept him til january so he could prove his fitness then flog him for £2.5 mil when he was back to his best!
he is better than matt mills and how much did he cost lester??
im fucking seething.
Exactly what I have been saying, but people just respond we don't need him we have Nathan Cameron or something stupid along those lines.
Even if he didn't come back to his best a young player with potential on a long term contract wouldn't decrease much in value from 750k.That's the thing, what if he isn't back to his best? Yes he played well for about 13 - 14 games and scored a few. That doesn't make a season, the season before he didn't stand out.
Leicester are throwing silly money around, everybody will be putting their prices up when Leicester come knocking.
Weren't brum offering 1mil aswell? dunno what the hell sisu are doing bloody leicester fans
Form over 14 games is a lot different than form over 3 games. If Freddy goes and scores 13 goals in 14 games expect him to be sold in January.That's the thing, what if he isn't back to his best? Yes he played well for about 13 - 14 games and scored a few. That doesn't make a season, the season before he didn't stand out and he has been out for nearly a year.
Yes, he was great when on form but let's be realistic. When Freddy goes on his scoring runs and gets like 5 in 3 or whatever does that mean he is worth £5 million?
There is no way we would get £2 million for him.
Leicester are throwing silly money around, everybody will be putting their prices up when Leicester come knocking.