Match Thread Tuesday v Rotherham Match Thread (1 Viewer)

jordan210 · Oct 25, 2022

We are not going to be able to run it through them with the amount of people they have behind the ball

pusbccfc · Oct 25, 2022

Grendel said:
He just refuses to play him as he’s fell out with him - it’s pig headed stupidity - he did it with waghorn and had to concede in the end

One of Robins downfalls. Too stubborn.

Brighton Sky Blue · Oct 25, 2022

Wasn’t this one of the easy games in hand

Moff · Oct 25, 2022

I sometimes think Robins would put Simon Moore on in defence ahead of Kane.

Seriously why the fuck pick him in the squad if he won’t play him.

pusbccfc · Oct 25, 2022

What does Gyökeres need to do to win a foul?

And how isn't that a yellow?

jordan210 · Oct 25, 2022

How’s the ref not given a corner

Liquid Gold · Oct 25, 2022

Maybe Kane has an appearance incentivised contract or something and we don't want to spend the cash.

No logical reason to refuse to play him like this.

CCFCBat · Oct 25, 2022

Terrible half I blame Dabo, Palmer, Rose, Wilson, Eccles, the ref, Robins and Sisu

Definite relegation. Robins out

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Grendel · Oct 25, 2022

Evo1883 said:
Bit pissed off with this half of I'm honest

i think it’s an entertaining game. They are physical but not bad. Hamer has been on his game and Allen done ok and we’ve moved the ball around ok at times

I feel a bit for Dabo he’s exposed a lot on that side and clearly struggling, palmer will be popular but not ever fit enough

Sheaf seems in decline at the moment

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Oct 25, 2022

Moff said:
I sometimes think Robins would put Simon Moore on in defence ahead of Kane.

Seriously why the fuck pick him in the squad if he don’t play him.

I think he'd pick the tea lady ahead of Kane.

*yes I do know Kane came on for a minute of two last game

Evo1883 · Oct 25, 2022

Poor half imo , started very negative , never really looked like scoring .. woeful pass across the pitch which left us open to counter ..

Shite

Probably annoyed at the score tbh

shmmeee · Oct 25, 2022

Liquid Gold said:
Maybe Kane has an appearance incentivised contract or something and we don't want to spend the cash.

No logical reason to refuse to play him like this.

Came on last game didn’t he?

Sky Blue Pete · Oct 25, 2022

pusbccfc said:
One of Robins downfalls. Too stubborn.

Has to have something he’s pretty awesome otherwise

HuckerbyDublinWhelan · Oct 25, 2022

CCFCBat said:
Terrible half I blame Dabo, Palmer, Rose, Wilson, Eccles, the ref, Robins and Sisu

Definite relegation. Robins out

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don’t forget Saracens, the RFU and Exeter Chiefs

shmmeee · Oct 25, 2022

Evo1883 said:
Poor half imo , started very negative , never really looked like scoring .. woeful oass across the pitch which left us open to counter ..

Shite

Harsh. Think we’ve been ok since about twenty mins. Goal was poor but completely against the run of play.

CCFCBat · Oct 25, 2022

HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Don’t forget Saracens, the RFU and Exeter Chiefs

And Liz Truss

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sky Blue Pete · Oct 25, 2022

Grendel said:
i think it’s an entertaining game. They are physical but not bad. Hamer has been on his game and Allen done ok and we’ve moved the ball around ok at times

I feel a bit for Dabo he’s exposed a lot on that side and clearly struggling, palmer will be popular but not ever fit enough

Sheaf seems in decline at the moment

It’s the role isn’t it. Hamer roaming and Allen further forward leaves him to do the donkey work

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Oct 25, 2022

CCFCBat said:
Terrible half I blame Dabo, Palmer, Rose, Wilson, Eccles, the ref, Robins and Sisu

Definite relegation. Robins out

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why am I reading that post to the tune of Mambo No. 5?

PVA · Oct 25, 2022

Frustrating game. Hopefully O'Hare can make the difference

Brighton Sky Blue · Oct 25, 2022

shmmeee said:
Harsh. Think we’ve been ok since about twenty mins. Goal was poor but completely against the run of play.

If we were in the same position we’d have waited for 20 seconds then sent in a looping cross. Got to make better decisions.

Evo1883 · Oct 25, 2022

Grendel said:
i think it’s an entertaining game. They are physical but not bad. Hamer has been on his game and Allen done ok and we’ve moved the ball around ok at times

I feel a bit for Dabo he’s exposed a lot on that side and clearly struggling, palmer will be popular but not ever fit enough

Sheaf seems in decline at the moment

Agree about sheaf

stupot07 · Oct 25, 2022

Really poor half. Been second best for large chunks of the game.

Too many players are having poor games, Rotherham are winning all the second balls. Gyokeres by far our best player but is struggling to get away from them as they are doubling up on him.

Palmer completely anonymous for 35 mins, had a nice 5 minute spell with some fancy flicks then gives the ball away abysmally leading to the goal.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

larry_david · Oct 25, 2022

Clive says their manager made changes as they were shattered on Saturday. Have to say they started very quick but they look tired now

Problem is they got a goal to hang on to now

ProfessorbyGrace · Oct 25, 2022

Ok, we’ve been caught out, stupid mistake, two players down but we’re certainly not out.

Bit of grit and pressing, they’re there for the taking. 2-1 City.

SeaSeeEffCee · Oct 25, 2022

We will need to score early in the second half if we want to win this game. They are happy to sit in and crowd us out centrally.

slowpoke · Oct 25, 2022

Esoterica said:
Wilson's positioning is atrocious for that goal.

Bloody rubbish comment

Paxman II · Oct 25, 2022

Well this is not going well. we are not cohesive enough at the moment and Rotherham certainly no mugs. We look a little worn around the edges compared to rotherham. Need to pik it up second half and strike early or it will be a long night.

ccfc922 · Oct 25, 2022

Sick Boy said:
How are we looking? Can’t watch until 2nd half.

Shakey first 10, dominated next 30, then Dabos cheesestrings gave way for their eventual 1-0 shithouse winner all of a sudden, we are playing against 11 defenders

baldy · Oct 25, 2022

Twice in that half the Rotherham commentator called the pitch an island for some odd reason

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Oct 25, 2022

Well that's not gone to plan has it.

Two injuries meaning we've used two sub slots and conceded a goal on the verge of half time.

Still got O'Hare in the back pocket so hopefully will come out with more purpose second half.

Great_Expectations · Oct 25, 2022

Still feel it’s if not when. Aside from the first 20, we’ve looked the superior team - reminiscent of last year. Their goal was a sucker punch and poor from Dabo and Wilson.

We still have COH to come on and impact the game, and even with it we’ll score.

I don’t really rate Kane, he has massive limitations, but even so I’d have put him ahead of Eccles at RWB. Equally this is game where we have more of the ball, so perhaps Eccles will work better in that WB role.

Brighton Sky Blue · Oct 25, 2022

ccfc922 said:
Shakey first 10, dominated next 30, then Dabos cheesestrings gave way for their eventual 1-0 shithouse winner all of a sudden, we are playing against 11 defenders

Think you missed a detail

Tommo1993 · Oct 25, 2022

We’re either *too* patient. Or too impatient in our build up sometimes. Gyokeres being guilty of the latter.

shmmeee · Oct 25, 2022

Id say O’Hare on for Allen but Allen is having a half decent game, he just fluffs his lines when he gets near the box.

Macca · Oct 25, 2022

To be fair the last 3 results have flattered the actual performances so we might not get away with it again. Nevertheless still in a far better place than 10 days ago

Match Thread Tuesday v Rotherham Match Thread (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency