Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Trust statement regarding the AHC (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter CJ_covblaze
  • Start date May 31, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 7 of 8 Next Last
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #211
stupot07 said:
Yes, the academy costs £1.1m to run, the fa give us c£500k

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Is that around the level of current losses?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #212
stupot07 said:
Cat 3 makes it harder to recruit, it also entails less coaching time and you're not competing against good quality academy and players, lowers the amount of compensatio

Some interesting points from Huddlesfield on it

http://mobile.htafc.com//news/article/academy-news-eppp-category-2-759941.aspx

Some more info here.

For example

11 year old cat 2: 260 hours coaching per annum v 150 coaching hours a week (cat 3)

15/16 year old: 624 hours coaching (cat 2) vs 312 coaching hours (cat 3)

By the time a player gets to 17 a ccat 2 academy player will have significantly more coaching hours and therefore more likely to have better technique, etc so more consistently produce decent youngsters.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...ggjMAM&usg=AFQjCNFrtQlnt-Cis3WpM3F3qZMyAU_lKw

10 players from the academy made first team appearances this season, we've sold £8m worth of academy players in tbr last 5 years, it more than pays for itself in sales and savings in wage bill.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
But does it if all that is used to plug losses when there is a free pool or relatively cheap source of talent to pluck from others development?

Edit :-Oh. Senior moment
I think there are 3-4 pitches at Ryton that could be utilised also if upgraded.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #213
wingy said:
But does it if all that is used to plug losses when there is a free pool or relatively cheap source of talent to pluck from others development?

Edit :-Oh. Senior moment
I think there are 3-4 pitches at Ryton that could be utilised also if upgraded.
Click to expand...
Forgot to add at our current level are we able to attract either good enough talent or Indeed the physical specimens required for this division?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #214
CCFC said:
The major point he actually misses is that you are expecting the club to deliver the same quality of service on £500k less funds as we lose that without cat 2.
Click to expand...
And if our players go elsewhere, like Sambou has, we get less compensation for being a lower grade academy. So it will cost more to run and we'll get less money back.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #215
chiefdave said:
And if our players go elsewhere, like Sambou has, we get less compensation for being a lower grade academy. So it will cost more to run and we'll get less money back.
Click to expand...
chiefdave said:
And if our players go elsewhere, like Sambou has, we get less compensation for being a lower grade academy. So it will cost more to run and we'll get less money back.
Click to expand...
My post above kind of suggests the level we play at dictates what we get when selling.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #216
wingy said:
Forgot to add at our current level are we able to attract either good enough talent or Indeed the physical specimens required for this division?
Click to expand...

I think that's where the long term comes in. We've done... alright with our academy recently. And showing a path beaten by Wilson and Maddison helps. hell, even Bigi and Thomas are 'successes' in that respect, in that they got a chance at bigger clubs thanks to their time with us.

What botheres me more is the likes of Phillips. To a degree we always need backups who won't be superstars, and that's where an academy's useful (more loyalty to the club who brought you up, cheaper wages and the like), but if the likes of Phillips end up not rated by the manager good enough to be reserve right back then... that's where you wonder about the point of it all.
 
Reactions: wingy and stupot07

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #217
What's the score with the connection these days? Has it gone?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #218
fernandopartridge said:
What's the score with the connection these days? Has it gone?
Click to expand...
Never hear or see it promoted in the media, for eons now.
 
Last edited: Jun 3, 2016

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • #219
CCFC said:
Things like coaching time aren't an issue as such as the requirements are minimum, there's nothing to stop the club putting in the same amount of coaching hours into the players as they do now to meet cat 2 status.

Thats the point he's making, all the requirements are minimum so there's nothing to stop us going above the minimum and running the academy to the standard we do now (the only difference would be limited access to indoor pitch stops us actually getting academy 2 status)

The major point he actually misses is that you are expecting the club to deliver the same quality of service on £500k less funds as we lose that without cat 2.
Click to expand...
Yeah I get that, I suppose that was my point. You need cat 2 status so you get the money in, you need the facilities (floodlights, indoor pitch, etc) to not only get the money but also to enable coaching time all year around, you're not going to deliver a £1.1m cat 2 standard academt including coaching hours, etc when you are only getting £200k grant and don't have access to the facilities needed to deliver the coaching all year round.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #220
fernandopartridge said:
What's the score with the connection these days? Has it gone?
Click to expand...
Still there, don't think the club has owned it for many years.
http://www.sportsconnexion.co.uk/contact-us/
http://www.sportsconnexion.co.uk/about-us/
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #221
Captain Dart said:
Still there, don't think the club has owned it for many years.
http://www.sportsconnexion.co.uk/contact-us/
http://www.sportsconnexion.co.uk/about-us/
Click to expand...
Had to sell it when JH lost money with Washington Diplomats.

Sent from my P9000 using Tapatalk
 

albatross

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #222
stupot07 said:
Yeah I get that, I suppose that was my point. You need cat 2 status so you get the money in, you need the facilities (floodlights, indoor pitch, etc) to not only get the money but also to enable coaching time all year around, you're not going to deliver a £1.1m cat 2 standard academt including coaching hours, etc when you are only getting £200k grant and don't have access to the facilities needed to deliver the coaching all year round.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I get where you are coming from and I would like to retain the Cat 2 status but i really believe the club is strapped for cash and needs to save money and that is what this is all about.

In order to get the £500k grant you have to spend £600k. The first team wage budget is under constraint, no money from the owners so if the club can free up £400k of the £600k for the first team then on last seasons performance that might be just that extra bit of quality required for promotion to the championship Thats £400k that is taken away from funding the clubs core activity and what brings in the supporters , better players and in turn young players to the club. Beginning to move us out of his mess.


So progress with the first team has to be the priority and that in turn will drive additional revenue which at a later stage could be put back into the academy.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #223
albatross said:
I get where you are coming from and I would like to retain the Cat 2 status but i really believe the club is strapped for cash and needs to save money and that is what this is all about.

In order to get the £500k grant you have to spend £600k. The first team wage budget is under constraint, no money from the owners so if the club can free up £400k of the £600k for the first team then on last seasons performance that might be just that extra bit of quality required for promotion to the championship Thats £400k that is taken away from funding the clubs core activity and what brings in the supporters , better players and in turn young players to the club. Beginning to move us out of his mess.


So progress with the first team has to be the priority and that in turn will drive additional revenue which at a later stage could be put back into the academy.
Click to expand...
I get get that, but if you drop the academy, you're not going to 9-10 back up players of quality coming through, people like kelly-evens, George Thomas, etc will be on significantly less than signing players on loan or first team pro's to be back up. The academt is paying for itself.

And what you're saying is very short termist. The academy and sbitc is also very important for engaging young fans, my 5 year old goes to the Saturday club and idolises James maddison and he gets the link of starting with sbitc, practicing getting better and if good enough 1 day playing for Coventry. Kids identify with the youngsters that have come through the academy.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

albatross

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #224
stupot07 said:
I get get that, but if you drop the academy, you're not going to 9-10 back up players of quality coming through, people like kelly-evens, George Thomas, etc will be on significantly less than signing players on loan or first team pro's to be back up. The academt is paying for itself.

And what you're saying is very short termist. The academy and sbitc is also very important for engaging young fans, my 5 year old goes to the Saturday club and idolises James maddison and he gets the link of starting with sbitc, practicing getting better and if good enough 1 day playing for Coventry. Kids identify with the youngsters that have come through the academy.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I agree with you 100%

I am not advocating the reclassification as yes it is short term, but what isn't about CCFC these days. I am just putting an alternative point of view as I genuinely believe that the club want to do this to save money. With the Wasps academy they have an opportunity to do it and point the finger else where. I strongly suspect that the club will be unable to reach an agreement with Wasps and will go to cat 3.

The real statement of intent from CCFC will be if they start to let some of the academy staff go or make them part time. SISU have said no more money, stand or fall with the money you get in. I really believe that it has come to the dismantling of the fabric of CCFC to allow them to survive.

Sad days
 
Reactions: wingy and stupot07

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #225
albatross said:
In order to get the £500k grant you have to spend £600k.
Click to expand...
But it generates far more than £600K in player sales. Not to mention a good chunk of our squad are academy graduates. Lose our status and it will be harder to recruit players.
 
Reactions: wingy

albatross

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #226
chiefdave said:
But it generates far more than £600K in player sales. Not to mention a good chunk of our squad are academy graduates. Lose our status and it will be harder to recruit players.
Click to expand...

OK CD. Your point raises some interesting questions with me.

CA has to make the decisions on how to use his available budget.

Do you want a club that has a successful first team or do you want a club that has a CAT 2 academy and sells all the best young players to support an ailing club?
If you have to support TM to move up the leagues, bring in the crowds would you gamble that extra bit to get him there?
There is no guarantee that spending the money on the first team will get you that promotion and conversely there is no rule that says that a Cat 3 academy could not or would not produce the same crop of Calum Wilsons etc.. Very few leave from the academy most spend at leat a season in the first team squad.

Put yourself in CA Shoes what decisions would you make? Extra First team Cash for success or a Cat 2 academy? but remember the budget can only be spent once.

Its a real quandary and I don't think there is a right answer because ideally you want both but i think that is the fix the club is in.
 
Last edited: Jun 4, 2016
Reactions: wingy

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #227
albatross said:
Extra First team Cash for success or a Cat 2 academy
Click to expand...
But that isn't the option. The academy makes a profit, if you lose the academy you don't have more money to put into the first team you have less. And you also have a big hole to fill in the squad in the likely event that you don't have as many players coming through at the required level. If you're a Wilson or a Maddison are you going to join a Cat 3 academy or look elsewhere?
 
Reactions: stupot07

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #228
chiefdave said:
Probably help if the actually told the club what was on offer
Click to expand...
Or maybe the club could ask?
 
Reactions: armybike

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #229
letsallsingtogether said:
Or maybe the club could ask?
Click to expand...
Would you not normally expect when someone makes you an offer for them to actually tell you what the offer is?
 
Reactions: torchomatic and stupot07

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #230
I've always thought buying back the connection would be ideal solution for the academy home long term
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #231
speedie87 said:
I've always thought buying back the connection would be ideal solution for the academy home long term
Click to expand...
You could probably build an indoor pitch if you used the spare land and knocked down what used to be the indoor cricket centre (what is that actually used for now?). But you'd only have two outdoor pitches. How close would that get us to Cat 2 requirements?

Would certainly be nice to have everything on one site and under our own control.
 

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #232
Who actually owns it, these days?
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #233
chiefdave said:
You could probably build an indoor pitch if you used the spare land and knocked down what used to be the indoor cricket centre (what is that actually used for now?). But you'd only have two outdoor pitches. How close would that get us to Cat 2 requirements?

Would certainly be nice to have everything on one site and under our own control.
Click to expand...

It's used for 5 aside, netball, functions and a gym. Also classes, but the numbers have dropped on the football front not as many leagues now.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #234
dongonzalos said:
It's used for 5 aside, netball, functions and a gym. Also classes, but the numbers have dropped on the football front not as many leagues now.
Click to expand...

Is it big enough to fit a pitch that meets the requirements in or would you need to knock the building down? Will have to take a closer look at what the other requirements are.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #235
chiefdave said:
Is it big enough to fit a pitch that meets the requirements in or would you need to knock the building down? Will have to take a closer look at what the other requirements are.
Click to expand...

The whole area is more than big enough including the car park.
You would have to pay a bit though I imagine.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #236
dongonzalos said:
The whole area is more than big enough including the car park.
You would have to pay a bit though I imagine.
Click to expand...
If you could use the existing building it could probably be done relatively quickly and cheaply. If you've got to knock the building down and start again its a much bigger project.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #237
chiefdave said:
Would you not normally expect when someone makes you an offer for them to actually tell you what the offer is?
Click to expand...
Unless it's just playing to the crowd
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #238
chiefdave said:
But it generates far more than £600K in player sales. Not to mention a good chunk of our squad are academy graduates. Lose our status and it will be harder to recruit players.
Click to expand...
I think that is what is hurting us the most in all of this,.
Another loss of status and attachment, yet this is where we are.
Again I do think If we select Prem offcasts carefully we have the potential to generate equal transfer funds to those currently whilst someone else does the development, possibly better physical specimens than we currently attract, less diminutive.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 4, 2016
  • #239
chiefdave said:
If you could use the existing building it could probably be done relatively quickly and cheaply. If you've got to knock the building down and start again its a much bigger project.
Click to expand...

I like the idea of an academy beside ryton.
If we were not having to build a new training facility as we keep ryton.
Could that money not be spent on the connexion and use it in the same way the Higgs centre was. A community place as well as the academy.
If the owner wanted to sell.

However even with that I would still want us to either agree long term at the Ricoh or start with a 18-23k stadium with the room to expand to 30k if the premiership dream is ever achieved.
 

albatross

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 5, 2016
  • #240
With respect CD you did not answer my question about how you would spend the budget..... and you are not losing the academy just spending less. The club has no money and the budgets are usually set at the beginning of the season. Any kids we currently have in the academy will most likely stay over the next couple of years anyway so what exactly are you losing?

Do you preserve the status quo with the academy producing players that are then sold to balance the books while the club slowly declines? it could be argued that this Cat 2 academy has not given us anything but relegation football for the last 15+ years. I acknowledge it has produced some fine players and probably turns a profit for the club but where is it getting the first team? There is no reason that a cat 3 academy could not produce the same quality of players that have come out of the academy over the last 10. With regards to going else where Leicester and WBA regularly take kids from Coventry into their academies.

This is just an alternative view regarding the way the club might be looking at its choices. like you I would like to do both.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 5, 2016
  • #241
chiefdave said:
Would you not normally expect when someone makes you an offer for them to actually tell you what the offer is?
Click to expand...

Personally I would expect that if it was this important to someone that the someone it's important to are proactive not reactive.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 5, 2016
  • #242
albatross said:
With respect CD you did not answer my question about how you would spend the budget..... and you are not losing the academy just spending less. The club has no money and the budgets are usually set at the beginning of the season. Any kids we currently have in the academy will most likely stay over the next couple of years anyway so what exactly are you losing?
Click to expand...

If the academy drops to Cat 3 you lose £250K in funding so if you want to continue to provide anything approaching the same level a further £250K a year has to be found to fund the academy. That is not money that is funding facilities, it's funding the day to day operation. If you don't find that you scale back the academy. Dropping to a Cat 3 academy will undoubtedly make it harder to recruit players, that will mean less players of the required standard for our first team and less chance of finding the next Wilson or Maddison. It also means that when academy players leave the compensation we receive will be considerably lower.

The academy also generates more than it costs to run so its not a case of saying spend £250K less on the academy and we'll have £250K extra for the first team budget (even if that would work with FFP). So no I would not divert money away from the academy to the first team.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 5, 2016
  • #243
chiefdave said:
Would you not normally expect when someone makes you an offer for them to actually tell you what the offer is?
Click to expand...
Yes but aas a landlord myself I expect them to ask me what they get for there money.
TBF if one of my tenants says they want to leave I put it straight on the market, I don't question their right to move or why.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 5, 2016
  • #244
letsallsingtogether said:
TBF if one of my tenants says they want to leave I put it straight on the market, I don't question their right to move or why.
Click to expand...
But lets say you overheard one of your tenants on the phone to their parents saying they hoped to one day buy the own house. Would then assume they are leaving imminently and get someone else in without asking your existing tenant what their plans are?
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 6, 2016
  • #245
oldskyblue58 said:
Questions about Academies

1) what is the gross CCFC spend on the academy (ie before the grant)
2) how many Cat 2 academies are there in L1 and L2
3) what is the expected spend on a Cat 3 academy and what grant do you get
4) is there another way to channel talent in to the 1st team? or to develop saleable assets?
Click to expand...

I know everyone focussed on down grading to cat 3 but that's not the only option is it? CA will have to consider whether keeping any academy is viable or not. They could for instance cherry pick from other academies and just operate a development squad/U21. Yes there will be compensation to pay on some of the players picked up but with the right cherry picking the added value could be just the same as academy investment. Isnt that what they have started doing with acquisitions like Jones ? Attract players by offering a clear progression to first team and good training & facilities? They have already it seems built a core development squad so it would possibly need an influx of three or four each season to keep it ticking on

They could probably run it all from Ryton and reduce the investment in staff. Facility costs could be reduced. The Academy it is argued pays for itself because of the player sales of former academy players - well you can look at it that way certainly. You could also look at it that no significant increase in value happens until the player gets in the first team and that the value added by the academy for any player is the compensation due should they move on at that stage. The real value is added by playing first team. To get that one player you have to invest in many more players for many years. It has from the figures provided cost SISU/CCFC over the last 8 years £600k pa net to fund an Academy. Whilst some players made the first team, which has been largely failing in Championship & L1, many have walked (been pushed)with no fee at the end of their contract. The two that buck the trend are Wilson & Maddison.

Then there are the youngsters to look at U8's U9's etc. Is there an option to form partnerships with organisations like Strachan Academy, Coerver etc to badge part of there work with the CCFC brand and ship the cost of actually running the Academy out to them

Just thoughts, not saying its the way to go, but what if that is the decision being made........

I am not saying this is correct, unless you have the numbers to crunch then no one knows, but CA especially in the current circumstances has to look all options
 
Last edited: Jun 6, 2016
Reactions: Deleted member 5849
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 7 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?