Glad that the comparison with cash and support rich Southampton has been raised again.
No he has said it could be a good move for us.
Talking of bad tastes there is none worse then the taste Sisu have, yet we all find the time to speak to them.
So the Trust who on many occasions have tried to rebuild the bridges are now part of the problem.
FFS nick you are digging a bigger hole then you started in.
And how it is a great move for Coventry etc and justifying franchising of it.
Like I said, I think by default the club should be working with the trust, but on the other hand we all saw what happened with the haskell thing didn't we when they thought the trust were in on that?
They weren't interested in talking to the council or.
So the council reply will be we never had and offer or contact with Sisu.
Which I believe has been mentioned before.
Get back In the Sea/Pool you and ponder your future options .:facepalm:
Ah yes, the old letter approach that will simply be ignored and nothing said of it again, another master stroke from the trust.. honestly what a complete and utter joke we have become, time for some real action starve the fuckers out they have no where to turn, no land, no stadium, no strategy, no real feeling for the club, no hope of the Ricoh, nothing.
Because the chairman of the trust is putting in every post how good the Wasps move is?
Now I've said many times in the past theres no excuse for the way SISU have been with the trust with some of the things, but don't give them even more ammo by promoting Wasps coming here whenever possible.
Is it that hard to see the next excuse for not speaking to the Trust?
Edit: Of course People will have their own opinion away from the trust which they are entitled too, but it is easy to see the SISU excuse a mile off. I am not saying "you must agree with sisu so they talk to you". Maybe just don't make it so obviousThink of it like this, if somebody was protesting about you for months, shouting, banners etc (this isn't me saying it was wrong to protest) but then somebody else does the same thing and they are actually justifying it saying how good it is, would you want to speak to them? What taste would it leave? On that note I think of course the club should work with the Trust, but I think it should work both ways with bridge building.
you are joking right? usual Trust rant, full of opinion, conjecture and point scoring. Club wont talk to trust as they have plotted against them in the past.
This needs to come from the 2000 members of the trust not an everchanging cabal at the top.
Trust needs to ;
1. Appoint a chairperson with some credibility and influence who can talk/mediate with the club - or else we will be stuck with that pointless oddball Jonathon Strange as the Voice of the Fans
2. Sort the membership out - Been 2 years since we all paid a pound - get everyone AND more to join - make it £2-5 and create a genuine membership base who can lobby/petition etc and have a realistic fighting fund.
3. Stop writing stroppy letters like this that will go straight in the bin
4. Have a media strategy - influence the telegraph, CWR etc
5. be more professional! stop being a tinpot bunch meeting in the backroom of a pub and get organised.
thanks.
Have the trust written to the former owners of ACL and/or publicly criticised the wasps deal?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Yeah, lets do that instead of holding our owners to account on the future of the club. That will get things moving onwards and upwards for sure.
Who said anything about doing it instead of holding our owners to account?
Why is it always an either / or with you?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Have the trust written to the former owners of ACL and/or publicly criticised the wasps deal?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Yeah, lets do that instead of holding our owners to account on the future of the club. That will get things moving onwards and upwards for sure.
What has that got to do with it? It would be nice to know what the present owners are planning. Why ask ex-landlords or new tenants, or criticise them when you want to know how CCFC are going forward? Just ask SISU what they are planning. They presumably have a business plan.
What do you seriously expect to be gained by the trust writing a letter to the former owners of ACL?
We know what happened. Its what happens next is important surely?
I don't expect anything to have happened, not the point is it?
What do you think is going to be gained by this letter? TF will give us the same BS we'll be no more informed than before.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
What has that got to do with it? It would be nice to know what the present owners are planning. Why ask ex-landlords or new tenants, or criticise them when you want to know how CCFC are going forward? Just ask SISU what they are planning. They presumably have a business plan.
Why is it either or?
The trust should make a statement regarding wasps and they surely should oppose the move on principal. If wasps and ACL are not in the trust brief why are they guest speakers at their meetings?
Why is it either or?
The trust should make a statement regarding wasps and they surely should oppose the move on principal. If wasps and ACL are not in the trust brief why are they guest speakers at their meetings?
Then what will happen is a statement will go out saying SISU refused to answer questions but WASPS did, WASPS are the good guys.
Errr. Because our fan base want to ask questions of them and the trust is the largests fans group.
Its a shame TF cant treat us with the same respect that Wasps have demonstrated wouldn't you agree?
Then what will happen is a statement will go out saying SISU refused to answer questions but WASPS did, WASPS are the good guys.
More a case of SISU are the bad guys but we all knew you couldn't bring yourself to say that.
The last three open meetings.
Steve Waggot and TIm Fisher
Steven Pressley
Nick Eastwood
would you like to be next Grendel?
Then what will happen is a statement will go out saying SISU refused to answer questions but WASPS did, WASPS are the good guys.
Why is it either or?
The trust should make a statement regarding wasps and they surely should oppose the move on principal. If wasps and ACL are not in the trust brief why are they guest speakers at their meetings?
Again, why couldn't the trust criticise and show their disappointment about the wasps deal? I'm talking specifically now, I'm talking about over the past 2 months. And I wasn't having a go, I was merely asking a valid question.
In fact did the trust write to Higgs in support of ccfc's bid employing higgs to really consider the future impact on the club before making a decision?
Boom there it is, Steve just said he was also at an open meeting?
Boom there it is, Steve just said he was also at an open meeting?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?