Oh dear Donald
We've got an orange pile of shite
And into my accountLiberation day in tatters, favourite word,yeah liberate your citizen's from their money!
He won't obey the law and the usual sycophants will defend it.If he has to give it back would be interesting, I'm sure they'll find a workaround.
He does have toIf he has to give it back would be interesting, I'm sure they'll find a workaround.
So dangerous them dissing the Supreme CourtWe're hearing from Vice-President JD Vance who has called the ruling "lawlessness from the court, plain and simple".
"Today, the Supreme Court decided that Congress, despite giving the president the ability to 'regulate imports', didn't actually mean it," he wrote on social media.
"[The rulling's] only effect will be to make it harder for the president to protect American industries and supply chain resiliency," Vance said.
He wrote in 2024 about wanting to terminate the constitution.I see he’s said the judges are disloyal to the constitution - that’s a bit rich.
He’d be better saying disloyal to the country or America. Of course they’re upholding the constitution and he should zip up and VanceHe wrote in 2024 about wanting to terminate the constitution.
If fair elections are held and a Democrat wins, so many of these criminals in the Trump regime should be put on trial. Mass trials for the ICE goons as well.
Trials for the masked goons and their superiors who have broken the law.What do you mean by mass trials?
Trials for the masked goons and their superiors who have broken the law.
I believe huge numbers have violated the 4th amendment to the US constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Anyone who has apprehended people, gone into homes, workplaces etc and hasn't produced a warrant signed by a judge based on probable cause that they've committed a crime, has violated that right. The high profile cases of ICE agents murdering US citizens go without saying.How many of them do you think have done that out of interest? I get that that there should be a few who are rightly put before the courts, but mass trials sounds very heavy.
I believe huge numbers have violated the 4th amendment to the US constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Anyone who has apprehended people, gone into homes, workplaces etc and hasn't produced a warrant signed by a judge based on probable cause that they've committed a crime, has violated that right. The high profile cases of ICE agents murdering US citizens go without saying.
It would at this point be easier to list the crimes that have not been committed by this regime and its subordinates than the ones they have. The president himself is deeply, deeply corrupt and the 'border czar' Tom Homan was recorded accepting a 50 grand bribe in a brown paper bag. We could go on and on.
The cases against the 'protesters' probably won't get very far. Whilst Pretti shouldn't have been killed, there's a reason the story has disappeared from the front page overnight. The guy was a violent antagonist and has been on video attacking law enforcement. It is unlikely those officers will be prosecuted.
It’s difficult to take this post seriously to be honest. The rights in their constitution aren’t up for debate and these have been violated countless times.The cases against the 'protesters' probably won't get very far. Whilst Pretti shouldn't have been killed, there's a reason the story has disappeared from the front page overnight. The guy was a violent antagonist and has been on video attacking law enforcement. It is unlikely those officers will be prosecuted.
Other than being a bit heavy, which I agree there has been some evidence of, you are not going to see mass trials of people who were doing a job you don't agree with. I have said before that I also agree that ICE needs to be reformed and a few should be made an example of, but mass trials seems very heavy.
You see the Irish guy story?The cases against the 'protesters' probably won't get very far. Whilst Pretti shouldn't have been killed, there's a reason the story has disappeared from the front page overnight. The guy was a violent antagonist and has been on video attacking law enforcement. It is unlikely those officers will be prosecuted.
Other than being a bit heavy, which I agree there has been some evidence of, you are not going to see mass trials of people who were doing a job you don't agree with. I have said before that I also agree that ICE needs to be reformed and a few should be made an example of, but mass trials seems very heavy.
This sounds dangerously close to “he had it coming” which you and others were up in arms about regarding Charlie Kirk.
He was murdered on camera. So why do the people who did it avoid accountability?No it doesn't. That's what you want to hear.
It’s difficult to take this post seriously to be honest. The rights in their constitution aren’t up for debate and these have been violated countless times.
He was murdered on camera. So why do the people who did it avoid accountability?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?