shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Average cost for a dozen eggs is $3.
$5 for a dozen normal eggs up 3 fold.
I am not saying the economy is not doing well for the elites, but that was not who switched.
Immigration , well what happened to all those Refugee Welcome signs in progressive areas, ok much less likely to be an issue for them but seems they are not taking any chances.
Maybe, but if necessary he'd try and change that required majority. The houses and the courts are more likely to side with him and themselves could use their majority to chip away at other things to enable it further down the line.Only Congress can approve such an amendment and it would have to be a two thirds majority in both houses.
Of course the 22nd amendment was required following FDR going against long established precedent.
Trump isn’t the first President to talk about amending it, Reagan and Clinton, off the top of my head.
US officials who will soon be out of work once Musk sacks all of them and replaces them with MAGA loyalistsOne thing you have to say about trump is he defiantly comes off as someone who carefully studies all the data and asses the impact before making a decision
Come on, if Trump and his echo chamber want to do it they will do it. As we keep getting told Trump has everything sewn up now and can pretty much do what he wants. US officials will be making those sort of suggestions to others to avoid spooking the markets. They have no idea what Trump will or won't do.
He's been making promises about all sorts of crazy stuff, seemingly off the cuff, on the campaign trail. Nobody has a clue what he will actually implement.
“SIR Keir Starmer is set to attend the UN climate talks today - while other world leaders, including from the biggest greenhouse gas emitters, China, the US and India, stay away. The COP29 meeting in Baku, Azerbaijan, will have 50,000 attendees - half the total in Dubai last year.”And still the right thing to do so we can influence the world
I still think it’s sound to lead the science on it and reap the benefits
The answer of course is nuclear
So lets just sleepwalk into a catastrophe because others won't be going.“SIR Keir Starmer is set to attend the UN climate talks today - while other world leaders, including from the biggest greenhouse gas emitters, China, the US and India, stay away. The COP29 meeting in Baku, Azerbaijan, will have 50,000 attendees - half the total in Dubai last year.”
Im sure our influence will persuade everyone including the absentees,
So lets just sleepwalk into a catastrophe because others won't be going.
You do understand the concept of leadership don't you?
I do.So lets just sleepwalk into a catastrophe because others won't be going.
You do understand the concept of leadership don't you?
Whatever the UK does will have no discernible impact if the absentees carry on regardless, or in USA case increase fossil fuel production and use under Trump.So lets just sleepwalk into a catastrophe because others won't be going.
You do understand the concept of leadership don't you?
And doing what others are doing is going to change that?I do.
The UK is not a leader.
Again, so we should not do what is right just because others are doing it.Whatever the UK does will have no discernible impact if the absentees carry on regardless, or in USA case increase fossil fuel production and use under Trump.
Still the right thing to do to follow the science“SIR Keir Starmer is set to attend the UN climate talks today - while other world leaders, including from the biggest greenhouse gas emitters, China, the US and India, stay away. The COP29 meeting in Baku, Azerbaijan, will have 50,000 attendees - half the total in Dubai last year.”
Im sure our influence will persuade everyone including the absentees,
Why are you wetting your knickers about Trump winning? Absokutely nothing to do with economics for you really though. It's the 'woke' thing again and your sadistic love of hatred and intolerance based on ignorant bigotry. What a negative outlook on life you take.
He’d be criticised whether he went or not tbfIts not leadership when the real leaders are staying at home. Still I am sure a few nice lunches are to be had.
Very good point.He’d be criticised whether he went or not tbf
Having a climate change denialist in the White House does make what we do futile I think.Very good point.
He goes - Was pointless him going
He doesn't go - An insult and an outrage
Bloody makes it a lot, lot harder.Having a climate change denialist in the White House does make what we do futile I think.
I understand NESO issued a report saying that UK net zero was doable but very arduous. We will have to accept that demand will need to be controlled though. Power cuts at peak times.Still the right thing to do to follow the science
I”ll be a spring chicken at 96.Bloody makes it a lot, lot harder.
Trump is going to regret his stance come 2050.
I hope he has a very anguished 104th birthday.
I’ll be 60. Will probably still be ranting on here about the 2024 electionI”ll be a spring chicken at 96.
The one that was fixed, but he still wiped the floor with the Democrats, one?I’ll be 60. Will probably still be ranting on here about the 2024 election
Totally rigged, totally stolen. Nobody knows more about election rigging than me-believe me.The one that was fixed, but he still wiped the floor with the Democrats, one?
What anyone does is utterly futile unless China and India fall in line.Having a climate change denialist in the White House does make what we do futile I think.
The USA clearly can make a huge difference. Pity you voted someone in who doesn’t even believe it’s a problem.What anyone does is utterly futile unless China and India fall in line.
I understand NESO issued a report saying that UK net zero was doable but very arduous. We will have to accept that demand will need to be controlled though. Power cuts at peak times.
China, India and the USA will be pissing themselves laughing,
I see they are insisting on no boilers in new builds. Builders worried about scale up needed for air source heat pumps And that it may interfere with the need to build 300,000 houses per year to keep to Labours target. A bit of a step change from the current 35,000 heat pumps being produced per year. Government seem more keen on banning current technologies rather than proscribing new ones.We need to build nuclear and wind and insist on solar and battery on new builds. We shouldn’t be trying to limit usage.
I see they are insisting on no boilers in new builds. Builders worried about scale up needed for air source heat pumps And that it may interfere with the need to build 300,000 houses per year to keep to Labours target. A bit of a step change from the current 35,000 heat pumps being produced per year. Government seem more keen on banning current technologies rather than proscribing new ones.
Wind has produced very little first two weeks of November, solar next to nothing.
Best get on with it then, Rolls Royce have been waiting for ages.That’s what the nuclear is for. Heating needs to be electrified same as cooking ultimately.
Best get on with it then, Rolls Royce have been waiting for ages.
Wrong again, how can I vote in a US election?The USA clearly can make a huge difference. Pity you voted someone in who doesn’t even believe it’s a problem.
Fucking hellDonald Trump appoints Elon Musk to 'efficiency' role and Fox News host as defence secretary
Some rumours he could fire as many as 75% of American civil servants. I would assume the only departments they’d want to keep open would be the military, immigration and perhaps some tax collection stuff.Fucking hell
Surely the system would collapse if you got rid of 75% of civil servants. Saying that look what he did when he took over twitter and how that has rapidly deteriorated as a resultSome rumours he could fire as many as 75% of American civil servants. I would assume the only departments they’d want to keep open would be the military, immigration and perhaps some tax collection stuff.
Fucking hell
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?