He would still has to win a 3rd term so even if he did remove the term limits, so what?He's got the house, senate and supreme court sewn up this time so its a slightly different situation to his last presidency.
It can’t be difficult to find someone with more charm and humour than Starmer. Or to find one who sticks to a set of principles as well. Even in the USA!She's absolutely awful. There must be a huge well of candidates that are capable of beating Trump but they keep dredging up turds.
Was a Starmer type enough maybe? I'm thinking Starmer but with a bit more humour and slightly cringey American charm.
And there you go again making things up, you can’t help yourself
if you can show me where I have made out that “people are literally trying to stab him” (either Robins or Trump) we can talk then
UK is an island.I’m not sure it’s ignore
I think it’s more there is no black and white answer to it and it will only get worse and this is just talking about economic rather than lack of water or food which will be the next migratory effects
No man and no country is an island I’m afraid
They have been misled that there are easy answers that don’t have shit consequences much like reform here
Be careful not to talk down to people please.
They tend to be quite socially conservative too on issues such as abortion.They are not dissimilar to the ethnic minorities and their organisations who are concerned about continued immigration to the UK.
And?Nope but you can bet 100% of white suprematists voted for him
You'd think people would consider it 'woke nonsense' saying nothing positive can come from telling people what they are. Aren't they always "say it how it is" and "call a spade a spade"? If someone tries to shove their fingers in a plug socket they're stupid. They probably wouldn't like hearing they're stupid, but they are whether they like it or not.People don't like other people telling them that they're stupid and thick .
Who are other people to sit on their throne looking down at others telling them what they are ?
There's nothing positive to come from that
And the elites online were tweeting into the void.Well I'm talking down to a video , on my phone
Look through how much you exaggerate about what people were saying.
It's really not hard.
Also the people who hate snowflakes but upset an academic on twitter can’t understand their reasoning.You'd think people would consider it 'woke nonsense' saying nothing positive can come from telling people what they are. Aren't they always "say it how it is" and "call a spade a spade"? If someone tries to shove their fingers in a plug socket they're stupid. They probably wouldn't like hearing their stupid, but they are whether they like it or not.
Oh, and nobody likes calling people stupid more than Donald Trump. It's one of his go-to attack strategies.
If you look at Trump's words, actions and deeds and then still vote for him, you are an idiot. I shall call them such and have no qualms about it.
Apparently one of the two biggest issues was democracy. Then they've voted in the candidate who has talked and acted like a fascist dictator and incited an insurrection to try and democracy. Those are the actions of idiots.
so I didn’t say that, correct. Stop making things up
Sad fact for me is I’m more bothered about us picking up 3 points than Harris losing I think
Makes me a bad man doesn’t it
She made no references to her gender or race throughout the campaign but yes keep making things up.They tend to be quite socially conservative too on issues such as abortion.
The exit polls suggest a high turnout of the women’s vote and that did not translate into votes for Harris. Considering her central policy focus was on women’s reproductive rights, is a big failure.
She made the exact same mistake as Hilary Clinton did in 2016, hedging their bets on the women’s vote, specifically the unmarried women’s vote (married women favoured Trump).
We will all be lighting candles soon enough,We've even had a political broadcast from a green party MP in Bristol, you'd think the USA actually just voted in Joseph goebells and Adolf Hitler
so melodramatic , such student union type nonsense
Last time I felt like it would be a shitshow, but a funny one because he was absolutely clueless. He thought he could actually be Presidential. That's pretty much how it turned out.You've already had a trump term lads ffs .. you know what a trump presidency looks like you all said the same when he won before
That’s award because Trump has record the highest vote share of Jewish and Latino voters a republican candidate has ever recorded. In fact, the governor’s house in Peurto Rico flipped to Trump.Nope but you can bet 100% of white suprematists voted for him
We will all be lighting candles soon enough,
Sort of a diffferent pointThat’s award because Trump has record the highest vote share of Jewish and Latino voters a republican candidate has ever recorded. In fact, the governor’s house in Peurto Rico flipped to Trump.
Arab American voters are backing Trump in Michigan which has helped swing the state. Likewise, the Harris has seen a decrease in support with African American voters.
The data just does not support your viewpoint. Compared to say, Romney and McCain, Trump has mobilised significant support amongst ethnic minorities.
I didn't say you said those words, I said "Whereas you on every thread making out people are literally trying to stab him."
If you want to be on here just to follow people around to try and give it the "gotcha", you probably need to be a little bit smarter.
Keep backtracking if you like, all good. I’ve never come anywhere near saying people were literally trying to stab him. You know it, I know it. Don’t make things up
I don’t think it’s a shock no the consensus was it was neck and neck but the margin of error could cause an easy win either way. Probably Trump has done slightly better than expected but then the polls had him leading nearly every swing state yesterday.I’ve seen it described as a shock in quite a few places. Is anyone a surprised? I was fully expecting him to win.
I’ve seen it described as a shock in quite a few places. Is anyone a surprised? I was fully expecting him to win.
I never said she did. It’s undeniable that the abortion issue was key to her campaign, something CNN highlighted when their exit poll came out - ‘state of democracy’ and ‘women’s rights’ being key concerns favouring Harris… Before the polls came in.She made no references to her gender or race throughout the campaign but yes keep making things up.
The Selzer poll has historically been a gold standard in state polling for Iowa. For it to have been so dramatically wrong is just bizarre.I never said she did. It’s undeniable that the abortion issue was key to her campaign, something CNN highlighted when their exit poll came out - ‘state of democracy’ and ‘women’s rights’ being key concerns favouring Harris… Before the polls came in.
She clearly had bad advice from people like J Anne Seltzer who believed the Dems were up 4% in places like Iowa. Which she believed was driven by the outrage on the reversal of Roe v Wade amongst women. Don’t believe me? Watch/read the pollster who came to this conclusion herself. On that note, the Dems believed they had a shot of swinging Kansas which was as ridiculous as those republicans believing they could swing NY and/or NJ.
Her campaign neglected a key demographic that backed Joe Biden. White working class men (specifically in the Rust Belt), the economy and jobs were a key in the election and as voters were not happy with the Biden admin on the economy. She did not have a policy programme that differentiated herself from Biden - in fact she said she’d have changed nothing when inflation was significant.
The Selzer poll has historically been a gold standard in state polling for Iowa. For it to have been so dramatically wrong is just bizarre.
But abortion being a plus for Harris is a consequence of what Trump did. Not that it matters, he ran an awful campaign and won big.
Of course. He’s a political genius. Great.Seltzer’s poll was an outlier and most polls had Trump winning it. She was out by 14% so clearly her methodologies and/or samples were flawed.
Clearly Trump ran a much better campaign than Harris because he’s outperformed the polls with an apparently all time unpopular VP candidate. On top of that, Harris benefitted from much more favourable coverage on mainstream media which makes this result even more telling for the Democrats.
It’s clear that you just don’t understand why people would vote for Trump. Then again, with all due respect, British liberals just don’t really get US elections.
Nope but you can bet 100% of white suprematists voted for him
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?