Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Yeah, in reality there aren’t any leftwing posters that actually support Starmer.
Yeah, in reality there aren’t any leftwing posters that actually support Starmer.Reading that thread I'd say about from a couple of people most are unhappy and disappointed with him, both in terms of what he has done in office and the stuff going on around it.
In fact I'd say a lot of his harshest critics are those on the left and even some Labour supporters.
Tim Walz debating JD Vance on Tuesday night, should be entertaining.
Pr expert isn’t heJust watched it in full.
A confident, articulate and impressive performance from JD.
Walz very hesitant and uncomfortable.
Proportional?Pr expert isn’t he
Can’t say Walz impressed me, the debate format doesn’t suit him as much as going out on the campaign trail or doing press interviews.Just watched it in full.
A confident, articulate and impressive performance from JD.
Walz very hesitant and uncomfortable.
BBC News - Vance and Walz stick to policy in polite VP debate - but who won?
Who won the Vance-Walz vice-presidential debate?
The restrained debate was a stark contrast to the fiery showdown between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, writes Anthony Zurcher.www.bbc.com
Pretty fair and balanced from the BBC there isn't it?
You’ll only be calling it balanced coverage if it praises the Republican candidate to be honest.It seems to pity the Republican candidate, and normalise the Democrat one. If you read it first and then watch the debate there's a bit of a missing alignment.
It's closer to balanced we've seen in a while, but still the wording and tones are a bit off.
You’ll only be calling it balanced coverage if it praises the Republican candidate to be honest.
I’m not sure it’s possible to cover politics of this type without a slight slant in the wording of your coverage. For the most part they are trying hard to do that, certainly by comparison to most American networks.No I wouldn't. There are some balanced articles on the BBC, but most have a slant on them. This one is another example that isn't quite right.
TrueI’m not sure it’s possible to cover politics of this type without a slight slant in the wording of your coverage. For the most part they are trying hard to do that, certainly by comparison to most American networks.
Yep overall tightening up and swing states dead levelAppears that the latest odds have shifted in the orange lunatic’s favour.
Yep overall tightening up and swing states dead level
I almost want him to win to watch the mess but then how much fun if he loses watching him and his followers smash everything up
Lots of conspiracy about hurricane being made up by democrats to win votes. Not made up caused
Trump is the same yet it doesn't seem to matter.The reality is the more Harris gets coverage the more hopeless she appears
This is part of it and the involvement with Israel is taking a small but decisive vote share away from the Democrats. Harris really needs another debate with Trump but he’s better off just holding rallies.The reality is the more Harris gets coverage the more hopeless she appears
This is part of it and the involvement with Israel is taking a small but decisive vote share away from the Democrats.
Trump is the same yet it doesn't seem to matter.
The language used here is again another example of a questioning and belittling coverage of Trump.
It seems like they're petrified he's going to win. If Harris had appeared on a podcast, they wouldnt be writing about it months later with such negative language. Such stupid journalism which only will play into his hands.
Trump talks MMA and golf in podcast push for young male voters
Someone's going to need to tell me which bit of this I'm supposed to be mad at and which part is supposed to be negative. Seems a perfectly reasonable articleThe language used here is again another example of a questioning and belittling coverage of Trump.
It seems like they're petrified he's going to win. If Harris had appeared on a podcast, they wouldnt be writing about it months later with such negative language. Such stupid journalism which only will play into his hands.
Trump talks MMA and golf in podcast push for young male voters
Who's Kacklers?The Kacklers Birthday on the 20th, do not forget to send flowers.
There is some deeply disturbing stuff coming out about Walz.
Do you mean this?The Kacklers Birthday on the 20th, do not forget to send flowers.
There is some deeply disturbing stuff coming out about Walz.
The Kacklers Birthday on the 20th, do not forget to send flowers.
There is some deeply disturbing stuff coming out about Walz.
Hmm. You a bot?The Kacklers Birthday on the 20th, do not forget to send flowers.
There is some deeply disturbing stuff coming out about Walz.
I think the world (and the American people especially) need to be petrified of a Trump win.The language used here is again another example of a questioning and belittling coverage of Trump.
It seems like they're petrified he's going to win. If Harris had appeared on a podcast, they wouldnt be writing about it months later with such negative language. Such stupid journalism which only will play into his hands.
Trump talks MMA and golf in podcast push for young male voters
Our civilisation is close to collapse we can only watch it happenI think the world (and the American people especially) need to be petrified of a Trump win.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?