Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I’ll ask the same about what Trump did as President the last time
I’ll ask the same about what Trump did as President the last time
Love this
Well, Trump imploded. Interesting to see what effect if any this has
Debates haven’t mattered much in the past. This one might be different given how bad the performance was but I think there are very few genuine undecided voters and even fewer who were already voting Trump who will suddenly change their mind.Yeah, I’ve watched about half, Trump really struggles to maintain control/focus…just gets involved in rants. I didn’t agree with how Harris became candidate but she’s performed pretty well so far
Debates haven’t mattered much in the past. This one might be different given how bad the performance was but I think there are very few genuine undecided voters and even fewer who were already voting Trump who will suddenly change their mind.
But we do it here all the time!🫣Yeah, I’ve watched about half, Trump really struggles to maintain control/focus…just gets involved in rants. I didn’t agree with how Harris became candidate but she’s performed pretty well so far
Because anyone with a brain can see how utterly terrible Trump being back in would be.US presidential debate updates: Trump and Harris attend same 9/11 memorial after fierce debate
Follow live as BBC journalists unpack US and global reaction, debunk key claims and analyse the impact of Tuesday's debate.www.bbc.co.uk
Taylor Swift endorses Kamala Harris for president in post signed 'Childless Cat Lady'
The singer's choice of words nodded to comments made by Trump's running mate JD Vance.www.bbc.co.uk
Nearly every article from the BBC about Harris reads as if they are endorsing her as well. It has been like it ever since Biden dissapeared. It's weird, but they are obviously worried Trump can win. It will be close, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it backfire to be honest.
That isn’t how I read the BBC analysis of the debate-if anything, it pointed out Harris’ flaws as a candidate which Trump didn’t focus on because he got triggered early on.US presidential debate updates: Trump and Harris attend same 9/11 memorial after fierce debate
Follow live as BBC journalists unpack US and global reaction, debunk key claims and analyse the impact of Tuesday's debate.www.bbc.co.uk
Taylor Swift endorses Kamala Harris for president in post signed 'Childless Cat Lady'
The singer's choice of words nodded to comments made by Trump's running mate JD Vance.www.bbc.co.uk
Nearly every article from the BBC about Harris reads as if they are endorsing her as well. It has been like it ever since Biden dissapeared. It's weird, but they are obviously worried Trump can win. It will be close, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it backfire to be honest.
NoneWell, Trump imploded. Interesting to see what effect if any this has
Because anyone with a brain can see how utterly terrible Trump being back in would be.
He's pretty much said he would turn it into a dictatorship where people have to swear loyalty to him, not the country. Can you think of any other examples from history where that happened....
That isn’t how I read the BBC analysis of the debate-if anything, it pointed out Harris’ flaws as a candidate which Trump didn’t focus on because he got triggered early on.
Every reporter has an opinion, but if you watch the debate, by any measure Trump did very badly. At some point it can’t be bias to just directly quote a man saying it’s his right to interfere with elections, or falsely stating that immigrants are eating pets.There are multiple snippets in there leaning towards Harris. Combine that with nearly every single article about her being in a positive light. It is a bit questionable and very often reads as if it is the BBC's preferred candidate that they are endorsing.
pretty much this, all anyone needs to do is watch the debate to see how very, very badly trump didEvery reporter has an opinion, but if you watch the debate, by any measure Trump did very badly. At some point it can’t be bias to just directly quote a man saying it’s his right to interfere with elections, or falsely stating that immigrants are eating pets.
If he has a problem with it, maybe he shouldn’t go round saying things like that in the first place.
Or vice -versa?That's not the point.
If we do democracy based on what one set of people think then it becomes very dangerous. It doesn't matter if Trump is a clown or not.
Every reporter has an opinion, but if you watch the debate, by any measure Trump did very badly. At some point it can’t be bias to just directly quote a man saying it’s his right to interfere with elections, or falsely stating that immigrants are eating pets.
If he has a problem with it, maybe he shouldn’t go round saying things like that in the first place.
Well that's what Trump is planning if he wins. He is going after anyone not aligned or loyal to him. Lawyers, judges, officials, advisors, civil servants. He will start imprisoning people for disagreeing with him, and the Supreme Court have basically said he can. In fact he could effectively have any opposition murdered and because he's president he's immune.That's not the point.
If we do democracy based on what one set of people think then it becomes very dangerous. It doesn't matter if Trump is a clown or not.
If your complaint is Trump and Vance being quoted as saying batshit crazy things on the campaign trail I can’t help you. Harris’ shortcomings as a candidate aren’t being excluded from these articles.This isn't confined to the debate. It has been happening ever since Biden got lost and Harris appeared at the front.
Well that's what Trump is planning if he wins. He is going after anyone not aligned or loyal to him. Lawyers, judges, officials, advisors, civil servants. He will start imprisoning people for disagreeing with him, and the Supreme Court have basically said he can. In fact he could effectively have any opposition murdered and because he's president he's immune.
If you don't realise just how bad and dangerous a second Trump term would be for democracy then I can't help you.
If your complaint is Trump and Vance being quoted as saying batshit crazy things on the campaign trail I can’t help you. Harris’ shortcomings as a candidate aren’t being excluded from these articles.
Not that it matters either way in swaying opinion, I think the vast majority of US voters have been set on their choice for a long time.
The BBC articles I’ve read haven’t been guilty of that in my view. There is one today in the Evening Standard which most certainly is however, and I’m surprised you haven’t pointed it out already.Nope. Please read what I've written and try again.
I don't have an issue with calling Trump out on his bullshit. I have an issue with the media fan-girling Harris and endorsing her as if she was their preferred candidate, which is what has been happening.
And that definitely sounds like something Trump would say.'Democracy only works when you vote the way I want you to'.
And he will still draw at least 45% of the vote.They are eating the dogs, they are eating the cats is the maddest shit ever.
Bloody immigrants. Coming over here, eating our pets...They are eating the dogs, they are eating the cats is the maddest shit ever.
That's not the point.
If we do democracy based on what one set of people think then it becomes very dangerous. It doesn't matter if Trump is a clown or not.
I would say actively trying to manipulate election results is anti-democracy, but each to his own. He’s lucky to even be allowed to run.That's not the point.
If we do democracy based on what one set of people think then it becomes very dangerous. It doesn't matter if Trump is a clown or not.
We have had that to be fair,poaching, royal swan's etc!They are eating the dogs, they are eating the cats is the maddest shit ever.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?