J
Keith asked the questions that I was going to ask on Monday, again without really getting an answer. Other than income was "journaled" across from Holdings to Limited in 2011, which again seems very suspicious. I do have some related follow up questions which I still inted to ask.
Do we know at what point the accountant there tonight became involved with the club? Is it more than 18 months ago?
Couldn't listen tonight but looking forward to going on Monday...what is the general view about Timmy's performance tonight...how did it compare to last night? Did he actually answer any questions tonight or avoid giving a direct answer throughout the evening like last night?
So my question was a decent one then? ' What happens if a 3rd party buys ltd......'
I personally felt he really struggled in two areas.
The accounts and why the club is not for sale.
Will be interesting to see these two subjects get really probed.
Also the accountant made reference to this forum showing that this is getting read.
A cracker. If the administrator is neutral and that happens then the FA get to decide who takes the club forward
A cracker. If the administrator is neutral and that happens then the FA get to decide who takes the club forward
Yes wouldn't it be great if the next person said my question is "Why haven't you answered the previous fan/speakers question?"wasnt there tonight ....... there are a lot of other good people too who would seem to have put tf on the spot once or twice
was going last night but couldnt get there will try get there monday.
Trouble i find with this process is if you can only ask a question then any pressure on TF is deflected by the next question addressing something else
wasnt there tonight ....... there are a lot of other good people too who would seem to have put tf on the spot once or twice
was going last night but couldnt get there will try get there monday.
Trouble i find with this process is if you can only ask a question then any pressure on TF is deflected by the next question addressing something else
wasnt there tonight ....... there are a lot of other good people too who would seem to have put tf on the spot once or twice
was going last night but couldnt get there will try get there monday.
Trouble i find with this process is if you can only ask a question then any pressure on TF is deflected by the next question addressing something else
It doesn't seem as bad for that as at past forums.
There has been a definate shift in the attiudes of Linnell, Eakin and Foster so that if Tim doesn't answer your question you get the chance to follow it up.
What happens if someone buys limited after being assured the GS is in it and they awaard it to holdings then they sue the FL :thinking about:Then SISU has to take the Football League to Court to prove the League wrong.
</p>A cracker. If the administrator is neutral and that happens then the FA get to decide who takes the club forward
<p></p>
<p> </p>
IMO Football league have already decided that SISU will be given the golden share. Why else would they be saying which grounds they would find acceptable for us to move to for the next three years
I thought he struggled a lot last night but was allowed to wriggle out of so much as he wasn't really probed when he avoided answering difficult questions. I also thought the accountant gave the impression he really didn't want to be there last night! Never doubted this forum is being monitored by them and I personally believe there have been occasional posters on here with a clear SISU agenda...but of course I'm a paranoid conspiracy theorist ;-) Thanks for the update Don...
Yes wouldn't it be great if the next person said my question is "Why haven't you answered the previous fan/speakers question?"
I think the true extent of their misjudgement of the real attitude of the fanbase has finally become apparent. Pity they were so slow on the uptake.
He was allowed to wriggle out of answering because the crowd were heckling and disrupting answers.
Yes frustrating when some key questions were asked. When he flounders don't jeer like the person question screw him down more.
His plan has more illogical floors than a dahli masterpiece.
Just keep probing and it unravels don't jeer and topic hop.
What happens if someone buys limited after being assured the GS is in it and they awaard it to holdings then they sue the FL :thinking about:
wasnt there tonight ....... there are a lot of other good people too who would seem to have put tf on the spot once or twice
was going last night but couldnt get there will try get there monday.
Trouble i find with this process is if you can only ask a question then any pressure on TF is deflected by the next question addressing something else
Exactly the FA have to stick to their stance.
Thats what they are scared of I would imagineExactly the FA have to stick to their stance.
The FA will do whatever creates the least amount of work for themselves.
Sisu will be the highest bid they will it seems buy it back
I agree, until football is forced to sort itself out then this will keep happening.
The FA, FL, and PL have all said they will resist political intervention in the game, yet they have yet to prove they are fit to run it.
Looks like WBA fans who have sailed free from all this may have cause to be concerned. Chairman has just Transferred his 60% stake from Ltd to a new company Holdings.
Sound familiar?
.It is so obvious when TF or his sidekick speak that they are trying to obfuscate ... smother us with financial detail, push the idea that the club is out of control through no fault of the current owners and suck us into their solution as the only one.
They are trying to wear us down to despair so they can lead us by the nose to wherever they lead, believing there is no alternative.
Exactly the presenters need to understand a question that doesn't get answered and allow the person to probe..
If it is rubbish then move on.
The whole games needs a shake up, football shouldn't be exempt from normal business practices. The whole acceptance that a club is expected to make big year on year losses is completely wrong.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?