Dog shit and cat shit?I never like to criticise officials (I’m sure you already know!) but it was a very mixed bag from him today.
What did their player do to our fans at the end? Didn't see it
That’s just sour grapes from our fans at the end I’m afraid-he/they were getting it during the match aswell.Didn't see the whole of it, but if it's the guy I'm thinking of, he was smirking and staring out the City support and was bang out of order. Go celebrate with your own fans - fine (nobody has a problem with that, but to face up to away fans (when they don't even know who the player's name is) and effectively tryand take the p*ss out of them was way out of line. If he had been getting stick off us all game, I could have perhaps forgiven him, but it was a pathetic gesture that wound a lot of people up. Number 16 (and having been reminded of the incident, I'm off to google who the player was - and cross him off my Christmas card list) Bet he's had some abuse on twitter.
Edit: Morgan Ferrier (ex - Boreham Wood, gangsta wannabe)
This is the problem, if we performed like that at work, week in week out ( and they do ) we would be sacked.
But it seems that the FA go at their way to protect them , the referees get paid good money to do the job .
Is it asking to much to have a bit of consistency .
Don't like the shushing thing from players (no need unless the player has been getting dogs abuse), but their No 16"s mocking wasn't in response to anything that I was aware of?That’s just sour grapes from our fans at the end I’m afraid-he/they were getting it during the match aswell.
If that’s the case was Luke Thomas out of order when he scored and shushed the fans in front of the Walsall fans and again in the corner?
If it's "on the opinion of the referee " why are they introducing VAR , may i suggest it's to help the referee to cut out the inconsistency, for all of the officials.I love this one that gets rolled out every week. It is impossible to get consistency. That would mean every referee who has seen let’s say the same incident during a game would always give the same thing. Of course they wouldn’t and this would never happen as sometimes it’s “on the opinion of the referee” and every referee is not a robot. They referee the game how they see it which doesn’t usually fit in with the bias that supporters want toward their team.
In which case, fair enough, but still a lack of class by the player.Yeah it was-I heard it throughout the game-and at Cook aswell.
I love this one that gets rolled out every week. It is impossible to get consistency. That would mean every referee who has seen let’s say the same incident during a game would always give the same thing. Of course they wouldn’t and this would never happen as sometimes it’s “on the opinion of the referee” and every referee is not a robot. They referee the game how they see it which doesn’t usually fit in with the bias that supporters want toward their team.
why do we think they miss them Nick? you only have to see playbacks on TV and you see most of the officials see and ignore things if you ask meIt is consistency in applying the rules.
Take Luke Thomas scoring against Walsall in the cup, he runs to our fans and stands there. They run on the pitch and he gets booked.
Leahy scores against us, actively calls fans to come onto the pitch to celebrate with him and nothing.
We see far too many in the lower leagues who are shocking. Linos just as bad when they miss things a few yards away.
why do we think they miss them Nick? you only have to see playbacks on TV and you see most of the officials see and ignore things if you ask me
VAR is for “matter of fact”. A bit like when goal line technology was introduced to see if the ball was over the line.If it's "on the opinion of the referee " why are they introducing VAR , may i suggest it's to help the referee to cut out the inconsistency, for all of the officials.
So referees will become robots.
A matter of fact would help make an opinion though.VAR is for “matter of fact”. A bit like when goal line technology was introduced to see if the ball was over the line.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?