You said you were going to discuss. Which should suggest you are interested. If so meet them and it maybe beneficial.
It you think it is bull arrange to meet them and show them up for what they are.
Puts it to bed once and for all.
One reason you may not want to, is because if it is a good offer that saves you money. That ACL have agreed to. Then why wouldn't you take it. Unless you don't intend to build a new stadium......
First off I cant fault KCIC for at least trying something.
Question
It has never made short term financial sense for the Club to stay at Sixfields, but the move has never been about the needs of the club. So by offering the club a short rent way back to the Ricoh (that was available to SISU all along if they wanted to ask) how does that change what SISU are trying to do or need?
It is not about the club, it never has been, CCFC is a means to an end....... that end is a capital return for SISU investors
Also I will say about investments the smart man knows when to walk and cut his losses. Else you are no better mug than a gambler who chases his losses more and more and ends up in the gutter and broke.
Yes, I would want to filter out whether it was serious or not. If I judged it was serious then I would go and meet them. I wouldn't need to show them up for what they are, they are the ones coming with a proposal to me and refusing to answer calls and the middle man's middle man passes me onto a middler man.
Have ACL agreed to it?
Bollocks, his entire job is bullshitting fans, he can spare a few minutes to get bullshitted himself. Aside from anything else, you have repeatedly stated that ML will meet anyone. Well here's someone wanting to meet him.
Both sides need to stop dicking around. No fucking excuse for it from either of them. Of course Michael is especially stupid as it's his bid to chase. Just like Sisu are stupid because it's their stadium rental deal to chase.
Everyone is stupid. Stop sticking up for them.
they are making a stance for the betterment of what should be ahead in the future and have clearly stated they will finance the Northampton scenario for up the 5 years (proven to the FL) until they get what they consider reasonable. Not short term return will change that and though I hate them for it, it is the right decision for them at this time. You must try seeing this as a long term goal/issue not a short term solution that brings no security of tenure or negotiation on ownership of said Arena.
Why would someone remain secret? For what aim?
I have said many a time they are as bad as each other. ML has said he will meet but just wants to talk on the phone first to get a few things cleared up.
Michael is trying to outkid a kidder.
Like I say, I expect it from ML. But just because he's always a tosser doesn't mean he should get let off for being a tosser in this instance.
Tosser.
Like I say, I expect it from ML. But just because he's always a tosser doesn't mean he should get let off for being a tosser in this instance.
Tosser.
Ain't that the problem though? Here's Labovitch's excuses on a plate for rejecting all kinds of shit for months, even years into the future!
Yep. That's exactly the problem. It's why I'm so pissed off. Rule 1 of dealing with Sisu as a fan is be completely open and down the line.
Rule 2 is PICK UP THE PHONE!
Why would someone remain secret? For what aim?
Fuck me bar a handful of us our owner of 5 years has been more invisible then Lord fuckin Lucan.
So why wouldn't she want to show her face even hides behind an umbrella and magazine....
ML has said he will meet but just wants to talk on the phone first to get a few things cleared up..
Rule 3 don't record it?
So, TF will meet a few people at the Squirrel, yet ML wont meet KCIC before a phone call ?
That's the SCG meeting he was at this evening apparently.
Isnt it dont feed them after midnight ?
I know who it is and he is mega loaded and if he can buy our club debt free, back at the Ricoh and the fans behind the club, our club we will be back where we belongKcic may have been well intentioned but their attempt to handle the situation resembles the keystone cops on a good day.
There seems to be £1 milion raised if we take the original offer at face value. This would allow rent free football for 3 years surely.
The mystery businessman should unveil himself and take ownership of this. If sisu have an interest all past misgivings should be abondoned and the initiative seized.
If it is not and the mystery man lurks in shadows we are entitled to ask why and is this in fact just a stunt to cause mischief and mayhem - which other not so mystery men appear to have indulged themselves in the past.
It remains a mystery.
I have said many a time they as bad as each other. ML has said he will meet but just wants to talk on the phone first to get a few things cleared up.
Michael is trying to outkid a kidder.
Didi ML ever give you permission to post up his email reply to you?
Did he say what the few things he wanted to clear up on the phone first were?
So, TF will meet a few people at the Squirrel, yet ML wont meet KCIC before a phone call ?
I think you may have missed the point of a forum... show me a thread that has practical value or intellectual consequence.
I agree with you, but do you think the individual investors in our club should be named too?
No.
Why should they? They're not the people who make the decisions at our Club, this is Joy Seppala.
There is no gain in revealing the investors names.
I think the gain is that they can be held to account for their actions good or bad. If there is nothing to hide why not reveal the names. Secrecy is rarely a good thing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Didi ML ever give you permission to post up his email reply to you?
Did he say what the few things he wanted to clear up on the phone first were?
I would guess the things they want to clear up are similar to the questions being asked on here, ie - what is it actually going to cost the club as attendances would likely be over 5k. That would let them know if it's to be taken seriously or not.
I think Nick already advised what ML had said, I'm on my phone so can't find it to paste down. It was a summary rather than direct quote I believe.
I may have missed it in the multitude of pages but I thought Nick was waiting on ML to confirm that he could disclose the contents of ML's reply to him on here rather than just the one snippet of "yes I've called MO and there was no answer, I just want to clear a few things up"
Perhaps Nicks out celebrating with sisu at the sisu victory party? thats why he hasn't been able to come on and confirm either way
(I'd just like to point out that the last paragraph was tongue in cheek)
But seriously. Nick if you could clarify that would be great. Cheers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?