Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Time for 4-4-2 (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter BlueSkiesForever
  • Start date Aug 31, 2024
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

BlueSkiesForever

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #71
clint van damme said:
What?!
Click to expand...

I just think sometimes we can hung up on one big thing and not see the wood for the trees. “How can we improve the midfield?! The midfield’s terrible! Midfield, midfield, midfield, MIDFIELD!!!”.

Maybe the answer is to improve the areas around the midfield so that the midfield can work better. I’m not saying that’s definitively the answer but it’s something I’ve been thinking about over the last couple of days. We’ve got a very limited number of midfielders so we’re essentially stuck with what we’re currently playing. I think a formation change or a style of play change is needed because I can’t see a way that that midfield is going to improve overnight.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #72
BlueSkiesForever said:
I just think sometimes we can hung up on one big thing and not see the wood for the trees. “How can we improve the midfield?! The midfield’s terrible! Midfield, midfield, midfield, MIDFIELD!!!”.

Maybe the answer is to improve the areas around the midfield so that the midfield can work better. I’m not saying that’s definitively the answer but it’s something I’ve been thinking about over the last couple of days. We’ve got a very limited number of midfielders so we’re stuck with what we’ve got atm basically, I think a formation change or a style of play change is needed because I can’t see a way that that midfield is going to improve overnight.
Click to expand...


The midfield is our biggest issue and the one that needs addressing most urgently. Until we do we'll continue to struggle.

Will a formation change help? Maybe. But I definitely think personnel is an issue. We're going to be relying on Sheaf doing at lot of heavy lifting when he returns.
 
Reactions: BlueSkiesForever and Perennial Lurker

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #73
Is 442 even svthing anymore so few teams play it.
 
Reactions: HuckerbyDublinWhelan and Perennial Lurker

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #74
Remember Guys, when it's Comes to Team Selection, Mark Robins a Stubborn Bitch.
 
Reactions: BlueSkiesForever

BlueSkiesForever

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #75
letsallsingtogether said:
Is 442 even svthing anymore so few teams play it.
Click to expand...

I think that’s a good thing tbh, if all oppositions are expecting us to set up in a certain way every week then we’ll be very predictable to play against. I think we need to be proactive and maybe be willing to do something other teams won’t if we’re to get ahead.
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #76
BlueSkiesForever said:
I think that’s a good thing tbh, if all oppositions are expecting us to set up in a certain way every week then we’ll be very predictable to play against. I think we need to be proactive and maybe be willing to do something other teams won’t if we’re to get ahead.
Click to expand...
It became dropped due to its inflexibility. England played 4-4-2 for years up until recently - it doesn’t work well against the 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 - the midfield gets overrun.

unless you’re bypassing the midfield and playing hoof to the big man little man combo it’s not feasible
 
Reactions: Frostie, shmmeee and Perennial Lurker

BlueSkiesForever

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #77
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
It became dropped due to its inflexibility. England played 4-4-2 for years up until recently - it doesn’t work well against the 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 - the midfield gets overrun.

unless you’re bypassing the midfield and playing hoof to the big man little man combo it’s not feasible
Click to expand...

I too think 4-3-3 is the best formation but for whatever reason we currently can’t seem to nail it and we’re lacking in attacking outlets. Our forwards are getting some chances but they’re always half-chances, I just think we need to go back to basics and try something different. Maybe 4-4-2 isn’t the answer but repeating the shitty play style on the pitch every week certainly isn’t
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #78
letsallsingtogether said:
Is 442 even svthing anymore so few teams play it.
Click to expand...
Defensively a few teams transition into it but from an attacking sense, pretty much nobody & for good reason. Villa are the only ones I can think of that nominally line up in a 4-4-2 but in truth one of the forwards (usually Morgan Rogers) plays much deeper to give the extra man in midfield.
 
Reactions: skybluecam
C

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2024
  • #79
The formation is fine. They just need a rocket up their arse.
 
Reactions: letsallsingtogether and CrowHouse
S

Skyblueabo1111

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 3, 2024
  • #80
SeaSeeEffCee said:
Our midfield would get even more over-run in 4-4-2
Click to expand...
Overrun already. Score more than them
 
Reactions: wingy

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 3, 2024
  • #81
I think fundamentally our problems this season have been progressing the ball quick enough to be able to open teams up, and maintaining control of possession in general. I don't think swapping a midfielder out for a striker will solve that.
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge

BlueSkiesForever

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • #82
Anyone fancy it yet?
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • #83
The problem with it remains the same. While it would let us make the most of the wide and central attacking players we have, the midfield pairing would really struggle.

Though that said, it's struggling anyway.
 
Reactions: wingy, Perennial Lurker and BlueSkiesForever

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • #84
BlueSkiesForever said:
Anyone fancy it yet?
Click to expand...

We're not formation tweaking our way out of this.
And the thought of one less player in the midfield is quite frightening.
If anything I'd go 5-4-1 and try and shithouse a few points.
 
Reactions: wingy, Perennial Lurker and BlueSkiesForever

BlueSkiesForever

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • #85
clint van damme said:
We're not formation tweaking our way out of this.
And the thought of one less player in the midfield is quite frightening.
If anything I'd go 5-4-1 and try and shithouse a few points.
Click to expand...

Yeah fair enough, I’m willing to try anything at this stage (I’ve still never been a fan of 5 at the back but certain games definitely call for it.)
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • #86
BlueSkiesForever said:
Yeah fair enough, I’m willing to try anything at this stage (I’ve still never been a fan of 5 at the back but certain games definitely call for it.)
Click to expand...

I was half joking but thinking back to Leeds away last year I'm fairly sure that's what we did
 
Reactions: wingy and BlueSkiesForever

BlueSkiesForever

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • #87
clint van damme said:
I was half joking but thinking back to Leeds away last year I'm fairly sure that's what we did
Click to expand...

I think you’re right tbf, ended up with a back 7 at times but it sort of worked so there’s definitely times where being ultra defensive is the right play. I just like the all round shape of a 4-4-2, just shouts stability to me, whether it works for us is another thing
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • #88
BlueSkiesForever said:
I think you’re right tbf, ended up with a back 7 at times but it sort of worked so there’s definitely times where being ultra defensive is the right play. I just like the all round shape of a 4-4-2, just shouts stability to me, whether it works for us is another thing
Click to expand...

I don't think there's any formation at the minute that would sort this pigs ear out.
We've got, by and large, a mentally weak group of players.
 
Reactions: shmmeee and BlueSkiesForever
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 25, 2024
  • #89
clint van damme said:
I don't think there's any formation at the minute that would sort this pigs ear out.
We've got, by and large, a mentally weak group of players.
Click to expand...
For some reason,who do we miss,or who are we missing?
 
M

Monty

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 26, 2024
  • #90
Who are the characters at the club now? Wilson? MVE? Not sure either of them is a leader. Sheaf seems more like the calmer captain and leader but doesn't exude passion. Kitching a loud voice, but again not sure he is a leader, maybe in the future, but you need to have respect to be a leader. Simms in many ways for a striker and a big guy, seems quite calm and passive. No passion, no leader, when things are going badly no oomph
 

BlueSkiesForever

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2024
  • #91
Already got two fans on CWR for 4-4-2
 

BlueSkiesForever

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • #92
Anyone…? Please?
 

ms639

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • #93
Not this again Dad
 
Reactions: BlueSkiesForever

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • #94
Saddlebrains said:
Flat 433 for me when everyone's fit

Dovin

Milan
Thomas
Kitching
DaSilva

Sheaf - the more deep lying player cutting out attacks and making tackles, starting moves
Eccles - him and Sheaf just work well together
Rudoni / Torp- the one with licence to drift in between the lines and make things happen, slot back in when defending

EMC - Tats is missing something at the mo, I know LW is his best position but he can do well enough on the right
Simms
Wright
Click to expand...

Oh yes them were the days, Sheaf cutting out attacks, making tackles and starting moves.

Can the real Sheaf stand up please.
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

Covcraig@bury

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • #95
OP. Time for 4-4-2 at the moment we would struggle with 8-8-4 , utter useless
 
Reactions: BlueSkiesForever
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?