Really? Don't remember you EVER saying anything against the council, but apologies if you did. Why not list them? What do you think the council got/did wrong then?
You said "We could lose to Crewe in the 1st round of the JPT again"
It is completely different, stop trying to catch people out.
I said in reply to a discussion about season tickets that kids are £25.
OK, there's a generalisation. I did a nice list for you. Sure you can do one for me
You fucking well know exactly what I meant. Playing, and losing to Crewe in the JPT AGAIN only this time in the first round!
I didn't know what you meant, I thought by saying "we will lose to crewe in the JPT 1st round again" you were saying we had lost to them before in the 1st round as it is exactly how it read.
Yes, but not in the first round like you said. It isn't a grammatical error is it? Unless by that you mean added extra words in.So the 3-0 mullering by Crewe in the JPT never happened? Get over yourself you self righteous prick. The reference meant was "Getting beaten by Crewe in the JPT." You never make Grammatical errors do you Nick.
Kid vs Nick is like this months Dongo vs Grendel.
Yes, but not in the first round like you said. It isn't a grammatical error is it?
QUOTE[Kids tickets £25.]UNQUOTE........ £25 what???
Yes, but not in the first round like you said. It isn't a grammatical error is it? Unless by that you mean added extra words in.
Pleez excuz, my Englund not very proppa. Mateeey.
For christ sake, have a look at the conversation I was replying to. The one about season tickets, and the cost of a man and his kids.
Plus, even if you couldn't follow a conversation. £25 for a kids season ticket is a fact, so something lots of people know.
I can't read your mind can I?
Stop trying to catch people out, especially when you jump in and don't know what you are talking about or are unable to follow the flow of a conversation / discussion properly.
At no time did you write the words.... for a kids season ticket. So NO, it's not a fact. It's a supposition on your part.
@ Nick..... Have you shifted your arse and looked what the price for kids up to 13 years old at MCFC is mate? Come on, chop, chop. I'm not going to do it for you....
Why would I?
Seriously, what the hell are you talking about? I haven't asked you to have I?
Strange? you and Grenduffy are usually the first to demand "Links"
I can't read your mind can I?
Same could be said about me!
SBk v NickKid vs Nick is like this months Dongo vs Grendel.
Now that's a scary thought.For christ sake, have a look at the conversation I was replying to. The one about season tickets, and the cost of a man and his kids.
Plus, even if you couldn't follow a conversation. £25 for a kids season ticket is a fact, so something lots of people know.
I CANT READ YOUR MIND CAN I ?
Stop trying to catch people out, especially when you jump in and don't know what you are talking about or are unable to follow the flow of a conversation / discussion properly.
Lol this still going on with sbk and nick i hadnt logged on for 2 days and still seeing it jesus ha.
Im in canada so cant say much but imo with ticket increases if more fans do go and the money is put towards the squad ect then fine and we see improvement but whats pissing me off is SISU saying want the club run itself and not invest but take the maddison money and dont reinvest it so basically how the club supposed to go forward if they wont invest any player sales!!
Lol this still going on with sbk and nick i hadnt logged on for 2 days and still seeing it jesus ha.
Im in canada so cant say much but imo with ticket increases if more fans do go and the money is put towards the squad ect then fine and we see improvement but whats pissing me off is SISU saying want the club run itself and not invest but take the maddison money and dont reinvest it so basically how the club supposed to go forward if they wont invest any player sales!!
How do you know if it has been invested or not? What about players like Jones for example?
The thing is people get all worked up and angry over the hear say / stuff that people shout the loudest and take as fact.
You don't know that they've taken any of the Maddison money, it's conjecture. There is no evidence that they have taken any actual money out of the club. Yes, there is a charge on the accounts, but the actual cash has remained in the club to be used.
i get ya just frustrating when they wont say how much he is sold for and where the money goes with us missing promotion hopefully he might see small bit of it in the summer but unlikely.
Won't it help go towards Jones? I am sure it will also go towards other players too. Free players have signing on fees still.
ya good point nick didnt think of that suppose we can forget about a 500k signing in the summer in a stand out player, hopefully TM can make what ever budget he gets works and with releasing few players aswell should free up wages so who knows whats going to happen.
You have just gone from saying SISU take the money to the money going into the club, to then saying about a 500k player.
I am sure you can keep moving the goalposts to have a moan.
Only 4 pages off my prediction post. 14 pages of he said she said without any result just insult of others intelligence or knowledge. Facts are these are the worst owners the club has ever had, the CCC should of never been involved in any part of our club. But they were and Sisu still are. If you want the paying public to fund a failing business then at least be honest with the future of the club, other than that pack your bags and fook off, the CCC have already done that, but have done it in by the city increases its income.
Sisu are hanging around yet noboby knows why, i am no fan of the CCC but they knew to get out and when too, these clowns are flogging a dead horse and asking us to feed it.. I would never defend any party in all of this but Sisu are the ones i dont see sense in therefore would defend the last and blame the first in our current plight. If you don't agree so what doesn't change my opinion or make me feel less of any Cov fan on this board or have the energy to ridicule, research or compare.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?