PUSB-We_are_going_up
Well-Known Member
They’ve only ever released amount of years the contracts are extended
They’ve only ever released amount of years the contracts are extendedYou mean like they always have? Yes?
They’ve only ever released amount of years the contracts are extended
What did Whitaker do?You're telling me that Boro made the unprecedented and totally insane decision to... play a wide player out wide, all because of Jay Dasilva?
You mean like they always have? Yes?
You were asking for more details than thatYes?
Don’t think it’s unreasonable to want to know when the new contracts expire tbf.The club offered the deals, the players accepted them, the clubs position will be stronger not weaker for it otherwise Doug would not have sanctioned the deals.
If we go up it will all be academic and if we don’t we know they are very capable players in this league.
It’s very positive news.
You were asking for more details than that
The club offered the deals, the players accepted them, the clubs position will be stronger not weaker for it otherwise Doug would not have sanctioned the deals.
If we go up it will all be academic and if we don’t we know they are very capable players in this league.
It’s very positive news.
£3k a week has been a long time rumour.Wasn’t Milan always rumoured to be on a fairly small wage? Also corrects that I assume if true.
Perhaps you meant to put, Whittaker is a decent player and the Dasilva skilfully took him out of the game.I’ve said it before on here people are saying Dasilva has been excellent are only judging it on his previous levels not the levels of a decent full back, Boro could see he was the weak link and put Whittaker very wide and Dasilva just left him alone we’re lucky he had a bad game and they don’t feed him that much.
Because clearly anyone who doesn't rate him has been shown up to have zero football knowledgeHappy with the Kitching situation and marginally MVE. But despite the feel good factor no idea why we’ve extended Dasilva.
In the Prem you can have up to 25 players but only up to 17 that are not seen as 'home grown'. We would need Rushworth and Onyeka for starters to have a chance of even competing occasionally.The entire squad needs replacing if we go up. Dasilva has been fine and one of the more consistent players this year.
He is limited and is without doubt our weakest starterBecause clearly anyone who doesn't rate him has been shown up to have zero football knowledge
It looks the best way to do it is be like Sunderland who have signed mainly big and powerful players from abroad and not the Ipswich way of signing all the best championship players or the Burnley way of praying buying a Spanish team and hoping for the best.In the Prem you can have up to 25 players but only up to 17 that are not seen as 'home grown'. We would need Rushworth and Onyeka for starters to have a chance of even competing occasionally.
Let's say we go for gold and invest £100m in our squad in transfer fees alone. That's an average of just £4m a player. But if we can get Rushworth and Onyeka we're up to about £20m already.
Our best chance of survival would be signing a Prem quality player for each position and keeping the best of who we already have. But even this wouldn't come cheap and would leave us with a massive wage bill. What would be best is bouncing between the Championship and Prem once or twice and keep improving the squad.
Even pep Barcelona would have a weakest starter, doesn't mean no new contract offeredHe is limited and is without doubt our weakest starter
In the Prem you can have up to 25 players but only up to 17 that are not seen as 'home grown'. We would need Rushworth and Onyeka for starters to have a chance of even competing occasionally.
Let's say we go for gold and invest £100m in our squad in transfer fees alone. That's an average of just £4m a player. But if we can get Rushworth and Onyeka we're up to about £20m already.
Our best chance of survival would be signing a Prem quality player for each position and keeping the best of who we already have. But even this wouldn't come cheap and would leave us with a massive wage bill. What would be best is bouncing between the Championship and Prem once or twice and keep improving the squad.
Barcelona would look to improve that position and we should have done the same, with him I don’t see what the rush was if he went totally out of contract it would be a short queue to sign him.Even pep Barcelona would have a weakest starter, doesn't mean no new contract offered
I suspect Lampard’s negotiations are paused until the end of the season with a possible promotion on the cards. I’d expect him to sign a new contract this summer regardless of what happens.Now the others that are staying,and Frankie?
Someone’s on the verge of a Micky Adams moment.Full on shmmeee derangement syndrome in force in this thread huh?
The issue there is you have to keep getting promoted which isn't exactly a given and if you look at what happened to similar clubs doing that in the form of West Brom, Norwich and Burnley, it either hasn't led to establishing themselves in the top flight or has led to becoming stuck in the Championship.In the Prem you can have up to 25 players but only up to 17 that are not seen as 'home grown'. We would need Rushworth and Onyeka for starters to have a chance of even competing occasionally.
Let's say we go for gold and invest £100m in our squad in transfer fees alone. That's an average of just £4m a player. But if we can get Rushworth and Onyeka we're up to about £20m already.
Our best chance of survival would be signing a Prem quality player for each position and keeping the best of who we already have. But even this wouldn't come cheap and would leave us with a massive wage bill. What would be best is bouncing between the Championship and Prem once or twice and keep improving the squad.
We would have to use the loan market well, if our staters Monday I think three would be ok in the prem and two of those were on loan, Rushworth as Onyeka has played there you would think him and on his day Wright.Genuine Q: do you keep improving the squad or do you lose your best players each time you’re relegated? I think best is to replace what you can, stay up, then replace some more. But either way it’s a huge ask.
Yeah no one would want a starter from the top team in the 2nd tier....Barcelona would look to improve that position and we should have done the same, with him I don’t see what the rush was if he went totally out of contract it would be a short queue to sign him.
MVE would 100% start for us in the PremWe would have to use the loan market well, if our staters Monday I think three would be ok in the prem and two of those were on loan, Rushworth as Onyeka has played there you would think him and on his day Wright.
Judge it by the teams around us Ipswich Boro Hull and Millwall wouldn’t want him as they all have better players. Teams that can pay more sheff Utd and saints both have better players.Yeah no one would want a starter from the top team in the 2nd tier....
He would but I’m not sure I would be wanting him to, his great asset is pace and they all seem quick at the top level and his positional sense is a bit lacking still.MVE would 100% start for us in the Prem
Oh come on he would play for Hull and MillwallJudge it by the teams around us Ipswich Boro Hull and Millwall wouldn’t want him as they all have better players. Teams that can pay more sheff Utd and saints both have better players.
Someone’s on the verge of a Micky Adams moment.
Dougaty and Giles can’t see it myselfOh come on he would play for Hull and Millwall
It looks the best way to do it is be like Sunderland who have signed mainly big and powerful players from abroad and not the Ipswich way of signing all the best championship players or the Burnley way of praying buying a Spanish team and hoping for the best.
Yet we are above all of themJudge it by the teams around us Ipswich Boro Hull and Millwall wouldn’t want him as they all have better players. Teams that can pay more sheff Utd and saints both have better players.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?