Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

This new stadium... (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Paxman II
  • Start date Nov 30, 2014
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #106
bigfatronssba said:
What on earth are you on about now? I couldn't give a monkeys toss if she is the Sultan of Brunei's 7th wife, she is still an awful woman.

Your the one that spent half the morning posting libellous comments about the council, so if anyone needs to watch their step its you.
Click to expand...


Where on earth, don't know what your on about?

However still laughing, you're very funny
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #107
RFC said:
Where on earth, don't know what your on about?

However still laughing, you're very funny
Click to expand...

Weird
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #108
Deleted member 5849 said:
tbf, they have concluded the pies should be locally sourced.
Click to expand...

... and the seats should not be sky blue as it confuses the players.
May I suggest yellow and black
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #109
bigfatronssba said:
Basically he means stop asking awkward questions and don't interfere with her ability to promote herself.
Click to expand...

See, I can accept she got involved for the 'right' reasons. There's certainly an argument it'#s better to influence from within, then sit outside and shout (see trust talking to SISU/Wasps for other examples).

It does no favours however, when reading the minutes brings out the following.

Other new stadium ideas were discussed such as local procurement of f & b
Click to expand...

And it seems only fair that, if she is reading, she might want to correct me when I consider this a waste of an opportunity to influence from within.

As an intelligent woman, she must recognise the credibility of the group is zero and, if that's unfair, then it can be corrected.
 
Q

quinn1971

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #110
Deleted member 5849 said:
See, I can accept she got involved for the 'right' reasons. There's certainly an argument it'#s better to influence from within, then sit outside and shout (see trust talking to SISU/Wasps for other examples).

It does no favours however, when reading the minutes brings out the following.



And it seems only fair that, if she is reading, she might want to correct me when I consider this a waste of an opportunity to influence from within.

As an intelligent woman, she must recognise the credibility of the group is zero and, if that's unfair, then it can be corrected.
Click to expand...


Apparantley they've known since July where the new ground is going but they're bound by confidentiality, in other words, they don't have any land and it's a load of bollocks,
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #111
Deleted member 5849 said:
See, I can accept she got involved for the 'right' reasons. There's certainly an argument it'#s better to influence from within, then sit outside and shout (see trust talking to SISU/Wasps for other examples).

It does no favours however, when reading the minutes brings out the following.



And it seems only fair that, if she is reading, she might want to correct me when I consider this a waste of an opportunity to influence from within.

As an intelligent woman, she must recognise the credibility of the group is zero and, if that's unfair, then it can be corrected.
Click to expand...


That's your opinion and you're welcome to it but it's not mine.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #112
RFC said:
That's your opinion and you're welcome to it but it's not mine.
Click to expand...

So you think she got involved for the wrong reasons?
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #113
quinn1971 said:
Apparantley they've known since July where the new ground is going but they're bound by confidentiality, in other words, they don't have any land and it's a load of bollocks,
Click to expand...



He who mocks, ah well guess you don't understand confidentiality and trust, sometimes just best to allow the process to in it's course and be patient but then again when have any football supporters been patient?
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #114
Deleted member 5849 said:
So you think she got involved for the wrong reasons?
Click to expand...


Please don't put words into my mouth.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #115
RFC said:
Please don't put words into my mouth.
Click to expand...

I'm not. You said my opinion wasn't yours. As I said I can accept she got involved for the 'right' reasons, I can only assume you disagree.
 
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #116
Deleted member 5849 said:
Whenever people post things you don't like, they're on the windup.
Click to expand...

No, I legitimately thought you were on the windup because your suggestion is that Aston Villa pay for half of a stadium they don't need and we become their feeder club, giving up the only one good thing the club has going for it it's academy while playing in a stadium too small for our club even in league one.

Deleted member 5849 said:
Then you come on threads and say nobody ever comes up with alternative scenarios:facepalm:
Click to expand...

No I don't and have't I have said no one has been able to demonstrate how building a new stadium makes sence financially and they haven't and that most certainly hasn't changed with your Aston villa idea that you won't even attempt to defend.

Deleted member 5849 said:
Are you *sure* you haven't been a CCFC board member at some point?
Click to expand...

None of this would have happened if I were making the decisions. Don't take that as blowing my own trumpet, I think none of this would have happened if a trained monkey were making the decisions.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #117
There's not much point trying to defend things to somebody who lets their hatred of SISU colour all elements of sanity. All I get is a bunch of stock no no no no NO NO NO NO NOOOOOOOOOO back.

Tedious in the extreme.
 
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #118
Deleted member 5849 said:
There's not much point trying to defend things to somebody who lets their hatred of SISU colour all elements of sanity. All I get is a bunch of stock no no no no NO NO NO NO NOOOOOOOOOO back.

Tedious in the extreme.
Click to expand...

You've written about 10 posts now about why you won't defend your idea, rather than 1 actually doing so. Not a great job of saving yourself tedium.

I would love us to own our own stadium as long as it was fit for purpose and if sisu actually did build one I'd be happy and have to change my opinion of them, however they won't be building one because it makes no financial sence whatsoever, but you feel free to keep shouting over and over again about why there is no point you speaking reason since I won't listen anyway. If they did actually have the money available and did want to build a new stadium they would have significantly outbid wasps and brought the Ricoh for the reasons I've described in the thread already but you've ignored because you are so intent on telling me I won't actually discuss anything.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #119
RFC said:
You've hit upon the potential answer in your reply.

After all the grief our temporary move to Northampton brought myself and others I'm astounded that anyone on here would even contemplate a long term partnership with a sports franchise who are relocating 82 miles from their true home. HELP!
Click to expand...

Reading one of your posts reminds me of watching 321 as a kid.

They're just a load of incohearent dribble mascarading as a riddle. You are proper mental.
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #120
Deleted member 5849 said:
I'm not. You said my opinion wasn't yours. As I said I can accept she got involved for the 'right' reasons, I can only assume you disagree.
Click to expand...

PLEASE Do not assume.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #121
RFC said:
PLEASE Do not assume.
Click to expand...

Well that's why I asked a question.

So I'll try again. Do you think she got involved for the wrong reasons?
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #122
skybluetony176 said:
Reading one of your posts reminds me of watching 321 as a kid.

They're just a load of incohearent dribble mascarading as a riddle. You are proper mental.
Click to expand...

If I am .......HELP! Take a look in the mirror
 

Rusty Trombone

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #123
RFC said:
Please try and keep up, Stadium Forum Chaired by Sandra Garlick have been meeting regularly for more than 12 months, surprised you haven't read the minutes of their meetings?

How do you know who I talk to but assume it's Tim Fisher?

I'm still laughing 
Click to expand...

You do know Sandra's separate forum group doesn't exist at present?
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #124
Deleted member 5849 said:
Well that's why I asked a question.

So I'll try again. Do you think she got involved for the wrong reasons?
Click to expand...


My opinion is irrelevant (as has been pointed out by numerous other posters), so I'll leave you to make that judgement.
 
Q

quinn1971

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #125
RFC said:
He who mocks, ah well guess you don't understand confidentiality and trust, sometimes just best to allow the process to in it's course and be patient but then again when have any football supporters been patient?[/QUOTE ]

explain this one then, I was told in July they knew where the ground was going, then in September it's down to two locations, baginton and exhall, they've told that many lies they've confused themselves,
Click to expand...
 
C

Cheshire Sky Blue

New Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #126
RFC said:
My opinion is irrelevant (as has been pointed out by numerous other posters), so I'll leave you to make that judgement.
Click to expand...

At last you get the message.
 
J

jas365

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #127
skybluetony176 said:
Reading one of your posts reminds me of watching 321 as a kid.

They're just a load of incohearent dribble mascarading as a riddle. You are proper mental.
Click to expand...

Nah those riddles on 321 made a lot more sense than this blithering idiot.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #128
RFC said:
Please try and keep up, Stadium Forum Chaired by Sandra Garlick have been meeting regularly for more than 12 months, surprised you haven't read the minutes of their meetings?
Click to expand...

And what a great job its doing. They are responsible for the matchday experience at the Ricoh.............
 
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 30, 2014
  • #129
RFC said:
You've hit upon the potential answer in your reply.

After all the grief our temporary move to Northampton brought myself and others I'm astounded that anyone on here would even contemplate a long term partnership with a sports franchise who are relocating 82 miles from their true home. HELP!
Click to expand...

Waffle. Answer the question.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 1, 2014
  • #130
martcov said:
Waffle. Answer the question.
Click to expand...
He never answers a question just comes on here with the I know it all we are still waiting for the breaking news on the his new stadium he promised months ago.

He really needs to stop listening to his boyfriend Tim and join the real world...
Rfc
Are you sure your not really Hector?

Nar Hector has more sense.
 

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 1, 2014
  • #131
RFC said:
My opinion is irrelevant (as has been pointed out by numerous other posters)
Click to expand...
'nough said
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #132
RFC said:
PLEASE Do not assume.
Click to expand...

It's all anyone can do with you RFC. You never actually say anything clearly so you leave people to make assumptions. If it bothers you enough for capslock, maybe take a bit of responsibility for your side of the communication like an adult.
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #133
ccfcway said:
And what a great job its doing. They are responsible for the matchday experience at the Ricoh.............
Click to expand...

Yes she seems to have shifted the goalposts somewhat. Was it originally not all about what was needed at the new stadium? Maybe she should throw in with the WASPs crowd.

I do feel a bit sorry for Sandra. She probably originally got involved in all good faith, believed it was actually going to happen, and now it seems to have all gone a bit astray will ultimately be another one with egg on her face. Cheer up Sandra, they say no publicity is bad publicity.
 
A

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #134
Stuff her, the silly cow. Another self obsessed idiot trying to put herself in the limelight and being paid a few quid to peddle Fishers lies and bullshit !
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #135
Ashdown said:
Stuff her, the silly cow. Another self obsessed idiot trying to put herself in the limelight and being paid a few quid to peddle Fishers lies and bullshit !
Click to expand...

She's a thinking mans Nicky Sinclair. At best.
 
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #136
quinn1971 said:
Apparantley they've known since July where the new ground is going but they're bound by confidentiality, in other words, they don't have any land and it's a load of bollocks,
Click to expand...


So if CCFC quote "Confidentiality" it is bollocks but if CCC/WASPS quote it then that's OK?
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #137
matcov I think a few pages back...

The fact will always be if you sat in a council chamber and knew you had an idea you were willing to sell a 250 years lease of the Ricoh for peanuts why would you not let the incumbent football club - regardless of present or past blood know? How could SISU come to the council with such a suggestion if they had no idea that was the way the council were thinking? You can't stich this on SISU I'm afraid as much as they deserve total apathy towards them.

I still want that question answered: Did Miss Sepella have any indication that a 250 year lease was available for peanuts?
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #138
The plain simple fact is that Sandra Garlick was a stooge in Shitzu's plan to distract the fans from the real issues. The plan failed since we were all able to see right through it.
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #139
Paxman II said:
matcov I think a few pages back...

The fact will always be if you sat in a council chamber and knew you had an idea you were willing to sell a 250 years lease of the Ricoh for peanuts why would you not let the incumbent football club - regardless of present or past blood know? How could SISU come to the council with such a suggestion if they had no idea that was the way the council were thinking? You can't stich this on SISU I'm afraid as much as they deserve total apathy towards them.

I still want that question answered: Did Miss Sepella have any indication that a 250 year lease was available for peanuts?
Click to expand...
And my question would be.....would that have made any difference.......they would still have wanted it for free!
 
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 2, 2014
  • #140
Paxman II said:
matcov I think a few pages back...

The fact will always be if you sat in a council chamber and knew you had an idea you were willing to sell a 250 years lease of the Ricoh for peanuts why would you not let the incumbent football club - regardless of present or past blood know? How could SISU come to the council with such a suggestion if they had no idea that was the way the council were thinking? You can't stich this on SISU I'm afraid as much as they deserve total apathy towards them.

I still want that question answered: Did Miss Sepella have any indication that a 250 year lease was available for peanuts?
Click to expand...

Did M/S Sepella say "unencumbered freehold or nothing"? Why would you try and sell someone, who in the first interview, said "I don't negotiate. Negotiating wastes time ", something that she doesn't want? She knew she could change her mind and make an offer, but she has to date remained stubborn and insists the new stadium will be built. Has she ever said, why didn't you offer me that deal? No. Because she obviously didn't want it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?