Was at the Wigan Athletic academy today which I believe is also a cat 2 like ours
Bit of googling and it seems their current academy is cat 3. Can see articles about them applying for cat 2 but nothing that says its been granted.Sure I saw Wigan were cat 3
You are right the epic failure by ccfc to invest in its youth and academy will in the long run have consquencesEpic fail....
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Bury picked up Man City's old one for peanuts as well.
Don't care what Chris Anderson says it just looks to me he has no intention of securing the academy despite them making plenty of money from it through player sales and why ? because it costs them money.
They have been investing £600-700k pa on the academy. If there's one thing you can't accuse them of is not investing in youth and the academy, if that was thr case we wouldnt have a top 10 rated academy in the country.You are right the epic failure by ccfc to invest in its youth and academy will in the long run have consquences
We can't afford peanuts, what can we get for crumbs or on loanBury picked up Man City's old one for peanuts as well.
But do they now want to stop investing, that is my worry.They have been investing £600-700k pa on the academy. If there's one thing you can't accuse them of is not investing in youth and the academy, if that was thr case we wouldnt have a top 10 rated academy in the country.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
But do they now want to stop investing, that is my worry.
We are all worried on here but our owners sit there quietly not seemingly doing anything.
They never seem to have a plan B so they loose the Higgs centre Build your own that is what most clubs would do.
That's not true. Man City's old one at Platt Lane is owned by one of the Manchester Universities.Bury picked up Man City's old one for peanuts as well.
Of course you are correct and the bulk of that £600/700k investment comes from an FA grant. We have made a good few million out of the academy so using some of that money to build our own independent of anyone else has to be better than piggy backing with Wasps, using some of the Maddison money for exampleThey have been investing £600-700k pa on the academy. If there's one thing you can't accuse them of is not investing in youth and the academy, if that was thr case we wouldnt have a top 10 rated academy in the country.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
No, they match the grant then some. So they put that in.Of course you are correct and the bulk of that £600/700k investment comes from an FA grant. We have made a good few million out of the academy so using some of that money to build our own independent of anyone else has to be better than piggy backing with Wasps, using some of the Maddison money for example
No, that is ccfc's contribution, the academy costs £1.1-1.2m per annum, £500k of which is fa grant, the remaining £600/700k is the clubs contribution.Of course you are correct and the bulk of that £600/700k investment comes from an FA grant. We have made a good few million out of the academy so using some of that money to build our own independent of anyone else has to be better than piggy backing with Wasps, using some of the Maddison money for example
Oh dear. Maybe you'd benefit from some research before rant.Of course you are correct and the bulk of that £600/700k investment comes from an FA grant. We have made a good few million out of the academy so using some of that money to build our own independent of anyone else has to be better than piggy backing with Wasps, using some of the Maddison money for example
Yes, we're all worried about that. I certainly am, but I can't believe the academy isn't a priority and a necessity for the club.
I'm hoping the silence is Anderson working hard behind thr scenes to sort out the plan b. Losing the academy would be a disaster.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
No. The FA grant an amount which is matched by the club. You are always so off the mark. Clueless.Of course you are correct and the bulk of that £600/700k investment comes from an FA grant. We have made a good few million out of the academy so using some of that money to build our own independent of anyone else has to be better than piggy backing with Wasps, using some of the Maddison money for example
But what you saw today wasnt a cat 2 academy. We'd need land the size of higgs site for a start, which will cost a few million (hence why wasps went to thr cheap option with higgs), then will cost around £7-8m to build, so you'd be talking £10-12m. Higgs centre cost £10m 12 years ago, wasps aren't having to do any major landscaping and pitch works, and there's is £7m plus £500k for thr land.But wouldn't it be beneficial to own our own than rent off Wasps ? If the running costs said above are correct either way if we have to match the FA grant it will still cost about £600k and the thread isn't really about that it's about building our own and to build it similar to what I saw today isn't that difficult imo
In the year we sold Wilson and Christie the Accounts show we received £2.7m, not sure if anyone else was sold that year. I'd be surprised if we've received more than £500k for Maddison. Obviously it's possible that we may get more money from the sale of these players in the future.I always saw the academy as the one place they would invest.
Say they were investing 700k a year.
For the last 10 years that's 7 million. (It will have been far less than this over the years but worst case scenario)
Over the last ten years think how many academy players have either made it into the first team or bolstered the squad on comparably very cheap wages.i appreciate this is more the case today than ever before.
Then look at the players sold recently or compensation received.
Christie (?)
Maddison 2.5 million
Wilson 3.5 million
Then future payments Christie making his international debut
Clubs gaining promotion
Playing reaching certain appearance levels.
The most important one Wilson if he recaptured his pre injury form and is sold on!
So it must pay fir itself and yet still there is a worrying trend of people closing academy's
the same has tiny tim working on the new arenaYes, we're all worried about that. I certainly am, but I can't believe the academy isn't a priority and a necessity for the club.
I'm hoping the silence is Anderson working hard behind thr scenes to sort out the plan b. Losing the academy would be a disaster.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Having a ground to play in is a priority and a necessity for our club. And we all know what happened there.Yes, we're all worried about that. I certainly am, but I can't believe the academy isn't a priority and a necessity for the club.
Having a ground to play in is a priority and a necessity for our club. And we all know what happened there.
We have the land...at Ryton, as much land as what I seen at Wigan, maybe a little more, layout just needs re-jigging a bit and there's indoor facilities at the Connexion !But what you saw today wasnt a cat 2 academy. We'd need land the size of higgs site for a start, which will cost a few million (hence why wasps went to thr cheap option with higgs), then will cost around £7-8m to build, so you'd be talking £10-12m. Higgs centre cost £10m 12 years ago, wasps aren't having to do any major landscaping and pitch works, and there's is £7m plus £500k for thr land.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
We have the land...at Ryton, as much land as what I seen at Wigan, maybe a little more, layout just needs re-jigging a bit and there's indoor facilities at the Connexion !
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?