David O'Day
Well-Known Member
there's no FFP in league 1, the sustainability rules there allow for massive spending, just look at blues.
there's no FFP in league 1, the sustainability rules there allow for massive spending, just look at blues.lot of bitterness and jealousy on here - not one of you would be bothered if we’d have done this.
FFP is horseshit and should be dropped. Only have to go back a few years back when technically we should have been kicked out the league for not having a home ground.
Remember how we took the piss out of Walsall when we played at Northampton but had Callum Wilson and Leon Clarke up front - they were arguing how we were passing FFP with crowds of 1k
There was at the time it’s on wages if I recall - 60% of the turnover on wages. Still is - can spend what you want but the wages need to be a % of turnover. Another farce in terms of the rules being all over the placethere's no FFP in league 1, the sustainability rules there allow for massive spending, just look at blues.
Ours couldn't even afford a helicopterMoney makes money and money controls the world, ultimately not politicians or the laws but the power to be able to pay for the best people to avoid abiding by any laws.
Leicester got a bunch of billionaires for owners and we got SISU ……
Honestly mate it has been.
PL win, FA Cup win, CL quarter finals - never in our wildest dreams!
And then getting relegated on purpose just to win another trophy and beat the rules.
Super stuff
What a c**t you’ve made yourself look.Ours couldn't even afford a helicopter
Not at all, go fk your sister you six fingered c**tWhat a c**t you’ve made yourself look.
Double downed on it, are you 15?Not at all, go fk your sister you six fingered c**t
Nope, but I honestly couldn't give a fk. Now run away and try not to cry your inbred c**tDouble downed on it, are you 15?
Urgghhh... you've forced me into deploying the poop bomb here. If we must, we can question the ethical acumination and use of their former owner's wealth but it is thoroughly unbritish to mock the dead and it makes us look backwards and bitter.Ours couldn't even afford a helicopter
It's a forum lol. You've literally got them fawning over cheating behaviour and lording it up on here!Urgghhh... you've forced me into deploying the poop bomb here. If we must, we can question the ethical acumination and use of their former owner's wealth but it is thoroughly unbritish to mock the dead and it makes us look backwards and bitter.
This kind of thing reflects badly on our club. When we beat them at the CBS, our fans behaviour stole the headlines. The current story is 'Leicester get away with cheating yet again'. Please consider how comments like this benefit our club.
Mmhm...It's a forum lol. You've literally got them fawning over cheating behaviour and lording it up on here!
Also, nobody specifically mentioned the owner btw, merely pointing out how ours couldn't afford a wealthy possession that someone rich might have, it could have easily been speedboat or mansion
Anyhow, deaths get mocked on jokes, days or less after celebrities die. If we really can't take the pee out of that of a bitter rival 6 years after then, it's a poor show. Certainly no different to Sunderland fans regarding Jimmy Hill, and as he wasn't a personal friend, it doesn't trigger me. A bit of sympathy for their owners mistress, who was also in the crash, probably fairer than for him.
So the PL have fucked up - they shouldAccording to the BBC report it was because they were in the EFL when the PL issued the charge:
View attachment 38293
It's a forum lol. You've literally got them fawning over cheating behaviour and lording it up on here!
Also, nobody specifically mentioned the owner btw, merely pointing out how ours couldn't afford a wealthy possession that someone rich might have, it could have easily been speedboat or mansion
Anyhow, deaths get mocked on jokes, days or less after celebrities die. If we really can't take the pee out of that of a bitter rival 6 years after then, it's a poor show. Certainly no different to Sunderland fans regarding Jimmy Hill, and as he wasn't a personal friend, it doesn't trigger me. A bit of sympathy for their owners mistress, who was also in the crash, probably fairer than for him.
So the PL have fucked up - they should
Have charged them now
You can’t within law charge someone twice. They don’t deserve to be sanctioned because the rules are pure bollocks.I don’t see why, as I said in my original post on this thread, they can’t bring the charges again now while they are PL members.
They deserve to be very heavily sanctioned, not just because of the rule breaches themselves, but because of the blatant way in which they have tried to avoid punishment by artificial means.
I think a fair punishment would be a twenty point deduction and not receiving any PL payments this season nor any parachute payments if they are relegated. I do appreciate that this won’t happen.
You can’t within law charge someone twice. They don’t deserve to be sanctioned because the rules are pure bollocks.
It applies in business law aswellBut the original charge was void for want of jurisdiction, so it shouldn’t count as a charge.
Obviously it all depends upon the rules. I don’t think that rules which apply in other areas, such as the criminal law, are relevant.
Remember when we exploited a loophole to put our sponsor on our shirtThis is the same thing again, Leicester exploit a loophole in the football rules. PL will just change their rules and close this loophole, so if anyone else tries it on the future they will get burnt.
You’re one of these types who applauds tycoons coming in and turning English football into what it’s become, I take it.You can’t within law charge someone twice. They don’t deserve to be sanctioned because the rules are pure bollocks.
I said it earlier it’s just bitterness and jealousy. If I became a billionaire over night there’s not one person in here that wouldn’t be cheering me on to spend 500m
I’m one of these people who doesn’t agree with not allowing teams to move up. The fuck up was allowing United to become a PLC in the 90s and loophole that.You’re one of these types who applauds tycoons coming in and turning English football into what it’s become, I take it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?