Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The World Cup Thread (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Earlsdon_Skyblue1
  • Start date Dec 1, 2017
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • …
  • 139
Next
First Prev 106 of 139 Next Last

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,676
Otis said:
Yeah, I get all that and I am a big Sterling fan, but at international level you have to take your chances.

Yesterday we scored 2, but they were the only 2 we had on target.
Click to expand...
Spot on. Not sure why it has suddenly become so fashionable to praise Sterling to the sky and proclaim anyone who doesn't agree doesn't know what he's on about but at the end of the day at some point missing chances is going to cost you.

Of course there are other things he does well but we'd be going nuts if Biamou was missing those chances, Sterling is a £50m player, putting away at least one of them shouldn't be beyond him.

Southgate isn't going to change the team now though, who would? We're in a World Cup semi.
 
Reactions: Captain Dart, Earlsdon_Skyblue1 and Paul Anthony

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,677
Sky Blue Harry H said:
Think I had a bet on Maguire to score first goal on SBT bookies - come on and update the system, I may have won a few quid for a change!
Click to expand...
Same here.

Have had a good run. I had Stones first scorer against Panama, Kane first scorer against Colombia, Maguire first scorer last night and also had England to win 2-0, Russia to draw and put a shed load on England simply winning.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Harry H

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,678
Sky Blue Harry H said:
Think I had a bet on Maguire to score first goal on SBT bookies - come on and update the system, I may have won a few quid for a change!
Click to expand...

well done Harry
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Harry H
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,679
Deleted member 5849 said:
Panama (how the hell did they manage to get to the WC?!?)
Click to expand...
Just checked. A whole 1,500 there to watch Trinidad & Tobago beat USA to knock USA out...
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,680
Deleted member 5849 said:
Just checked. A whole 1,500 there to watch Trinidad & Tobago beat USA to knock USA out...
Click to expand...
Interesting to note, but slightly unfair on the Yanks having to play two teams at once.
 
Reactions: Captain Dart and wingy

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,681
Otis said:
Same here.

Have had a good run. I had Stones first scorer against Panama, Kane first scorer against Colombia, Maguire first scorer last night and also had England to win 2-0, Russia to draw and put a shed load on England simply winning.
Click to expand...

What price did you get for Maguire?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,682
SIR ERNIE said:
What price did you get for Maguire?
Click to expand...
33/1. Think I had 30 quid on him.
 
H

hotrod

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,683
chiefdave said:
Spot on. Not sure why it has suddenly become so fashionable to praise Sterling to the sky and proclaim anyone who doesn't agree doesn't know what he's on about but at the end of the day at some point missing chances is going to cost you.

Of course there are other things he does well but we'd be going nuts if Biamou was missing those chances, Sterling is a £50m player, putting away at least one of them shouldn't be beyond him.

Southgate isn't going to change the team now though, who would? We're in a World Cup semi.
Click to expand...

If Sterling would pass to a better positioned player instead of being selfish,he would be a world beater and England would definitely win the World Cup.If he continues to be greedy we may come to regret his inclusion.

Regards.
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1 and Paul Anthony

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,684
hotrod said:
If Sterling would pass to a better positioned player instead of being selfish,he would be a world beater and England would definitely win the World Cup.If he continues to be greedy we may come to regret his inclusion.

Regards.
Click to expand...
Well that's it. He surely knows his finishing is poor. That has to form part of his mindset.

At Man City he gets loads of chances set up on a plate for him from just a few yards out.

For England he has to realise he is much less likely to get that and he should adjust his game accordingly and lay the ball off for others more often instead of taking the chance on and missing.
 
Reactions: Paul Anthony

tisza

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,685
CJ_covblaze said:
I thought this was the worst England team you could remember?
Click to expand...
same mistake too many made - confusing "team" with a side lacking star names.
Argentina proved you can have a couple of star names but if the rest is poor and have no team style not going to do well most of the time.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,686
Genuinely believe when the chips are down it's going to be Sterling who gets the goal.
last night showed that Croatian defence is going to struggle with players running at them - struggled with slow Russians taking them on at times. Know from PL experience Lovren is a penalty waiting to happen.
Need to look at overall picture. Sterling keeping Swedish & Colombian defence from pressing up. Extra time vs. Colombia and their defence was playing 10 yards higher up the pitch and creating England far more problems.
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,687
Otis said:
Well that's it. He surely knows his finishing is poor. That has to form part of his mindset.

At Man City he gets loads of chances set up on a plate for him from just a few yards out.

For England he has to realise he is much less likely to get that and he should adjust his game accordingly and lay the ball off for others more often instead of taking the chance on and missing.
Click to expand...

That’s unfair on Sterling. He plays in a different role at Man City and even Sané struggled in the German setup — international football is played a lot deeper so players in that mould get less chances all together.

Yesterday, Sterling was our most threatening player, his pace constantly put Sweden on the back foot and forced throw-ins, corners and freekicks from nothing over this campaign. I was reading some stats after the Colombia game, and we have far less completed dribbles per game than France, Belgium, Brazil and Sterling was by far ahead for us. Take him out of the team, and no one is carrying the ball. Coincidently, our main strength is set plays (by far the best in the competition) and one thing Kane and Sterling have done very well is drawing fouls so we can put Stones and Maguire up in the opposition box. A goal would have topped things off for Sterling, but yesterday was a vindication for Southgate in keeping faith in Alli and Sterling. The more reliable pundits have praised Sterling for his performance.

To put this example into a Cov perspective, Bayliss was such a revelation for us because he carried the ball, something that was missing in our team after Jones got injured. You have to have at least one main dribbler in your team.

Back to England, we need to create more chances for Kane though. Before the Sweden game, he averaged 3 shots a game (including penalties) and his Spurs average is 5 shots each game. He is our match winner and frankly, to stand a chance in the final (if we get there) we’ll probably need him to score.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,688
Mucca Mad Boys said:
That’s unfair on Sterling. He plays in a different role at Man City and even Sané struggled in the German setup — international football is played a lot deeper so players in that mould get less chances all together.

Yesterday, Sterling was our most threatening player, his pace constantly put Sweden on the back foot and forced throw-ins, corners and freekicks from nothing over this campaign. I was reading some stats after the Colombia game, and we have far less completed dribbles per game than France, Belgium, Brazil and Sterling was by far ahead for us. Take him out of the team, and no one is carrying the ball. Coincidently, our main strength is set plays (by far the best in the competition) and one thing Kane and Sterling have done very well is drawing fouls so we can put Stones and Maguire up in the opposition box. A goal would have topped things off for Sterling, but yesterday was a vindication for Southgate in keeping faith in Alli and Sterling. The more reliable pundits have praised Sterling for his performance.

To put this example into a Cov perspective, Bayliss was such a revelation for us because he carried the ball, something that was missing in our team after Jones got injured. You have to have at least one main dribbler in your team.

Back to England, we need to create more chances for Kane though. Before the Sweden game, he averaged 3 shots a game (including penalties) and his Spurs average is 5 shots each game. He is our match winner and frankly, to stand a chance in the final (if we get there) we’ll probably need him to score.
Click to expand...
Care to expand?
 
Reactions: wingy and Mucca Mad Boys

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,689
Mucca Mad Boys said:
That’s unfair on Sterling. He plays in a different role at Man City and even Sané struggled in the German setup — international football is played a lot deeper so players in that mould get less chances all together.

Yesterday, Sterling was our most threatening player, his pace constantly put Sweden on the back foot and forced throw-ins, corners and freekicks from nothing over this campaign. I was reading some stats after the Colombia game, and we have far less completed dribbles per game than France, Belgium, Brazil and Sterling was by far ahead for us. Take him out of the team, and no one is carrying the ball. Coincidently, our main strength is set plays (by far the best in the competition) and one thing Kane and Sterling have done very well is drawing fouls so we can put Stones and Maguire up in the opposition box. A goal would have topped things off for Sterling, but yesterday was a vindication for Southgate in keeping faith in Alli and Sterling. The more reliable pundits have praised Sterling for his performance.

To put this example into a Cov perspective, Bayliss was such a revelation for us because he carried the ball, something that was missing in our team after Jones got injured. You have to have at least one main dribbler in your team.

Back to England, we need to create more chances for Kane though. Before the Sweden game, he averaged 3 shots a game (including penalties) and his Spurs average is 5 shots each game. He is our match winner and frankly, to stand a chance in the final (if we get there) we’ll probably need him to score.
Click to expand...
As I have said a number of times, I am a fan of Sterling.

He has to score or set up others to score though, it really is that simple.

He was a constant threat to Sweden last night, but there was no end product.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,690
hotrod said:
If Sterling would pass to a better positioned player instead of being selfish,he would be a world beater and England would definitely win the World Cup.If he continues to be greedy we may come to regret his inclusion.

Regards.
Click to expand...

He wasn’t selfish at all. Sweden recovered that very well. The goalkeeper gets a touch and pushes it out wide. Then, a defender immediately covers the near post (option A closed) and before he can control the ball, 2 Swedish defenders cut the passing lane within about 3 seconds. He should’ve done better but you’ve got to give credit to the Swedish because they recovered really well.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,691
Otis said:
As I have said a number of times, I am a fan of Sterling.

He has to score or set up others to score though, it really is that simple.

He was a constant threat to Sweden last night, but there was no end product.
Click to expand...

There was plenty of end product as his pace pulled the defence apart on numerous occasions- he won corners free kicks and his pace created a lot of issues and space for others.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,692
Grendel said:
There was plenty of end product as his pace pulled the defence apart on numerous occasions- he won corners free kicks and his pace created a lot of issues and space for others.
Click to expand...

You were calling for him to be dropped the other day weren't you?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,693
Grendel said:
There was plenty of end product as his pace pulled the defence apart on numerous occasions- he won corners free kicks and his pace created a lot of issues and space for others.
Click to expand...
Hmm, and what about when Biamou was doing the same, but not scoring?

Biamou was clearly making space for others and was pulling defences about with his running and making a nuisance of himself.

How come with him it was only about the goals? You just kept putting up his goal stats endlessly all season.

I am a fan of Sterling, but at international level you have to take your chances.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,694
Otis said:
As I have said a number of times, I am a fan of Sterling.

He has to score or set up others to score though, it really is that simple.

He was a constant threat to Sweden last night, but there was no end product.
Click to expand...

We don’t create many chances from open play. Harry Kane’s only shot (that I can recall, first half) came from a Sterling dribble. Sterling, or anyone, isn’t the problem per se. The stat about Kane speaks for itself, he’s taking about half the amount of shots for England as he does for Spurs.

We set up in a very pragmatic way and have accepted that we’re not the best team individually and we’re not the most comfortable in possession to play through defenders as past German and Spanish sides have done. Our shape and tactics reflects this reality. The 3 centre backs gives us protection whilst the wingbacks get forward. Henderson, with his range of passing acts as a pivot, and generally, Lingard and Alli are to get forward (hence Southgate saying he sees as having 4 forwards). Sterling functions in a similar role to how a lot of teams play a 5-3-2 with a winger/midfielder operating as a ‘striker’. Not too dissimilar to how Bale played for Wales in 2016 or how Russia setup v Spain this World Cup. Why is this? In 5-3-2 systems, there’s generally a lack players who can dribble the ball if you play two ‘out and out’ strikers. At this moment, Southgate is picking the most balanced squad at this disposal.

As for tactics, we’ve scored 11 goals with only 3 goals coming from open play, 72% of our goals come from set pieces. Comparatively, none of the remaining teams in this World Cup have above 50% of their goals from set pieces (France are next on 45% IIRC). A wise tactic from Southgate because 43% of World Cup goals come from set pieces. However, we’re arguably overly reliant on goals from set pieces which tells you that we need to create more from open play of we’re too improve — in fairness, we created a couple of decent chances v Sweden.

The question is, is there anyone who can come in and do what he does better than Sterling? The answer is no. Southgate knows this.
 
Reactions: lifeskyblue

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,695
Otis said:
Hmm, and what about when Biamou was doing the same, but not scoring?

Biamou was clearly making space for others and was pulling defences about with his running and making a nuisance of himself.

How come with him it was only about the goals? You just kept putting up his goal stats endlessly all season.

I am a fan of Sterling, but at international level you have to take your chances.
Click to expand...

I agree with the Biamou points because goals aren’t necessarily the be all and end all.

Much like when Rashford missed a clear 1v1 with plenty of time and space? For Sterling’s chance, it was good goalkeeping and recovery defence. Should’ve done better, but his options were cut off very quickly — it wasn’t as easy as it looks, 100%.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,696
Sky Blue Harry H said:
Care to expand?
Click to expand...

What would you like me to expand upon haha
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,697
Otis said:
You were calling for him to be dropped the other day weren't you?
Click to expand...

Yes but you can’t deny he was effective yesterday
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,698
Otis said:
Hmm, and what about when Biamou was doing the same, but not scoring?

Biamou was clearly making space for others and was pulling defences about with his running and making a nuisance of himself.

How come with him it was only about the goals? You just kept putting up his goal stats endlessly all season.

I am a fan of Sterling, but at international level you have to take your chances.
Click to expand...

Biamou has zero pace to compare the two is absurd
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,699
Grendel said:
Yes but you can’t deny he was effective yesterday
Click to expand...
He was. There was definitely a case for dropping him after the Colombia game, rather less so after Sweden. There's an argument I suppose you start with someone else and bring Sterling on when they tire to run at them, but Rashford and Vardy seem to be Southgate's choices as impact subs in that respect.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,700
MusicDating said:
That's fine, you've selected your scapegoat already if we don't win it. And if we do win, it will be despite Sterling...

I'm screaming at the tv shouting 'how do you miss that!' as much as anyone, but that's ignoring what he brings to the side. He set up Kane's chance (which he should have scored from) and made the chances he missed by making great runs.

Why do you think Sweden (qualified ahead of Netherlands, beat Italy in the playoff, topped a group including Germany and Mexico) looked 'rubbish'? Maybe it was because they couldn't keep their nice rigid 4-4-2 formation and were scared of our pace.

I'm sure you know more than Pep, Gareth and Domenech though...
Click to expand...

It's not a scapegoat. It's called knowing your weaknesses and addressing them before it comes too costly. It is fact that we have ridden our luck in some games when we haven't buried our chances, nearly all of these have fallen to Sterling.

I said before the tournament he shouldn't be playing, can you honestly look yourself in the mirror and say he has played good? He has been one of our worst players, but now we are down to the 'yeah but he makes good runs' argument. It's laughable really that he had an average game (instead of terrible) against Sweden and suddenly he is the messiah again.

Sweden, for the record, are really awful. I lived there for a while and have followed them ever since, including watching every game of theirs this tournament. They put Pontus Jansson up front ffs. He is a mid-table championship centre back. How can you make out they are good?

I sometimes wonder if Sterling committed a murder if people would still defend him. He has been the disappointment of the tournament (hardly a shock) yet gets away with it because he makes good runs.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,701
MusicDating said:
3 ex-international defenders 'blindly defending him'...:emoji_joy:
Click to expand...

Take sides with them if you want, but it is a bit desperate.

He has been atrocious given he is supposed to be a 'star man'. You need to drop the love-in.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,702
SIR ERNIE said:
They finished above Netherlands in their WC qualifying group, beat France 2-1, knocked out Italy in their WC play-off and of course finished above Germany in their group.

So not exactly rubbish.

Credit England for making them look distinctly average.
Click to expand...

Sweden are rubbish. What did you make of them yesterday exactly?

I suggest you do what I did and watch them play in all of their internationals and come back to me with an apology. They would struggle in the championship.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,703
Mucca Mad Boys said:
I agree with the Biamou points because goals aren’t necessarily the be all and end all.

Much like when Rashford missed a clear 1v1 with plenty of time and space? For Sterling’s chance, it was good goalkeeping and recovery defence. Should’ve done better, but his options were cut off very quickly — it wasn’t as easy as it looks, 100%.
Click to expand...

What about the other eleventy billion chances he has missed?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,704
Grendel said:
Yes but you can’t deny he was effective yesterday
Click to expand...
If you look back at the thread, you will see Wingy was saying to take him off at half time and I was saying leave him on because he was a real threat to the Swedish defence.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,705
Grendel said:
Biamou has zero pace to compare the two is absurd
Click to expand...
Who said I was comparing the two on speed?

Was comparing in terms of making space for others.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,706
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
What about the other eleventy billion chances he has missed?
Click to expand...

What? 1 chance against Panama which Stones followed up?

He missed a couple of offside chances, so what? They wouldn't have counted anyway.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,707
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
I sometimes wonder if Sterling committed a murder if people would still defend him. He has been the disappointment of the tournament (hardly a shock) yet gets away with it because he makes good runs.
Click to expand...

You really know how to labour a point don't you.
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,708
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
Take sides with them if you want, but it is a bit desperate.

He has been atrocious given he is supposed to be a 'star man'. You need to drop the love-in.
Click to expand...
'Them' being international football people with I'd guess over 1000 top flight games of experience or you? Erm.

My view of Henderson has changed completely in this tournament and fair play to him. What would it take for you to be man enough to do the same with Sterling?...
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,709
MusicDating said:
'Them' being international football people with I'd guess over 1000 top flight games of experience or you? Erm.

My view of Henderson has changed completely in this tournament and fair play to him. What would it take for you to be man enough to do the same with Sterling?...
Click to expand...
If sterling didn't get the silly abuse in the media before then people wouldn't be trying too hard now
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 8, 2018
  • #3,710
MusicDating said:
'Them' being international football people with I'd guess over 1000 top flight games of experience or you? Erm.

My view of Henderson has changed completely in this tournament and fair play to him. What would it take for you to be man enough to do the same with Sterling?...
Click to expand...

What would it take? It would take more than just one average performance in an international tournament from a player who some have branded around as world class. All I've seen is the same shit.

I wasn't sure about Henderson, Pickford, or Maguire but they have been brilliant and I'm happy that's the case. I'm more than happy to admit maybe I've been harsh on them.

The day Sterling starts performing even half as good as some say he is I will be happy for him, and certainly happy to be proved wrong.

I've said this from the start but there is absolutely no way he's proved that this tournament. I've got zero basis to believe I'm wrong with him and if anything he has more people on his back than ever. It isn't just a conspiracy...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • …
  • 139
Next
First Prev 106 of 139 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?