Can't we just group them all together into one thread.How many threads are you gonna start? You say harsh having one for Maddison but you've started one for Murphy and Armstrong
How many threads are you gonna start? You say harsh having one for Maddison but you've started one for Murphy and Armstrong
Can't we just group them all together into one thread.
Everyone was awful.
I liked Stephens too
Can't we just group them all together into one thread.
Everyone was awful.
What about that on pass in the 2nd half? Shocker.I liked Stephens too
I'm not his biggest fan normally but though he actually had a decent game today.Stokes was shocking. But shockingly good for a player who was in non-league not long ago.
We had no plan b, that's what went wrong today. We tried to play through them with little one two's and when they didn't come off we had nothing else. Not until the 3 subs came on.I'm not his biggest fan normally but though he actually had a decent game today.
I honesty couldn't describe what went wrong today - we simply have no fight when the chips are down. We are flat track bullies. Can't do it when the going gets tough.
We had no plan b, that's what went wrong today. We tried to play through them with little one two's and when they didn't come off we had nothing else. Not until the 3 subs came on.
We've been saying for an age now that we lack a plan b.
But Lameiras came on and was even worse than what was already out on the pitch. He was simply dreadful.RCC did reasonably well, made some crucial saves, stokes put in a fair performance, cargil and Stephens started well but made some errors as the game went on. Vincelot and fleck didn't perform like we no they can. Arma was not given anything to test there defence, Ricketts was poor, to slow and predictable and is now the weak link in the back 4. Cole didn't really get going, huffed and puffed along trying but to no effect. Murphy and Maddison were poor. Murphy does not want to run at players anymore and take them on. Too wasteful cutting inside with a loose shot. Needs to produce. Maddison had his worst game in my opinion, seemed to try and draw too many fouls in positions that are no good to capitalise from a free kick. Too many touches and misplaced passes. With both him and Murphy not going in for 50/50 is costly in pressing from the front. Instantly the opposition are given a free passage into our own half.
Pts are getting critical now could be time for changes. Lameiras should be given a chance to have a impact at the expense of Maddison or Murphy
If we are lightweight across the midfield, the obvious answer is Rose. He has some physicality about him.Lightweight across the middle with Cole, Murphy and Maddison. Sure they can play nicely with the ball (well 2 of the 3) when they have it, but any 50/50s and we were losing out too much (especially as Vincelot got booked fairly early on). May need the physicality of Rose (as Cole won't be able to play 2 games in a week) and i'm just not sure whether Murphy needs a rest (play Tudgay up with Armstrong, and change the formation?)
You change your mind after every match.We keep saying that don't we.
Our winning run was one game in a row. Keep thinking we are going to click into gear and we don't.
I really liked TM trying to change things with the 3 subs today. Thought it was very brave, but I am now starting to question him in general.
I think it is now 3 wins in 14 matches. That's relegation form, not top 6.
I have this horrible feeling we might now slide into midtable mediocrity.
Something HAS to change.
Nope.You change your mind after every match.
I'd differ on that, thought he took on Fleetwoods defence when he came on and asked questions of them finally. Something we did not do after the first 15 mins, and did what Murphy didn't do and run at them, played passes and opened up gaps. Looked positive and offered himself which is what we need from a attacking position.But Lameiras came on and was even worse than what was already out on the pitch. He was simply dreadful.
Nope.
I have been positive all season long. I got negative about our automatic chances after Burton and got really concerned after Scunthorpe.
The Bury game though made me think that maybe we might be back on track.
Don't keep changing my mind. When we went 11 points clear of 7th place I said I believed a play-off place was sealed.
Today is the first time I have believed our play-off place is now at risk. Before today I was certain we would finish top 6.
I think nearly everything Lameiras did ended up with him losing possession, passing the ball out of play or putting a poor cross in.I'd differ on that, thought he took on Fleetwoods defence when he came on and asked questions of them finally. Something we did not do after the first 15 mins, and did what Murphy didn't do and run at them, played passes and opened up gaps. Looked positive and offered himself which is what we need from a attacking position.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I think nearly everything Lameiras did ended up with him losing possession, passing the ball out of play or putting a poor cross in.
I didn't see him do anything of note, other than put us in trouble unfortunately.
I really, really don't think Lameiras is the sort of player we need right now. We need more of a roll our sleeves up, fight for every ball type of player at the moment.
Didn't he play a part in the goal?I think nearly everything Lameiras did ended up with him losing possession, passing the ball out of play or putting a poor cross in.
I didn't see him do anything of note, other than put us in trouble unfortunately.
I really, really don't think Lameiras is the sort of player we need right now. We need more of a roll our sleeves up, fight for every ball type of player at the moment.
Didn't he play a part in the goal?
Yep, the one and only time Armstrong got played in behind the defence and it resulted in the equaliser.Didn't he play a part in the goal?
Did he? Can't remember who put the ball through. If it was Lameiras then fair play and I will accept that, but the rest of his play was poor.Didn't he play a part in the goal?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?