Z
For goodness sake - the £150,000 deal was not offered to the owners but to the administrator. How many times does this have to be said to you before it sinks in?
Z
For goodness sake - the £150,000 deal was not offered to the owners but to the administrator. How many times does this have to be said to you before it sinks in?
rent at sixfields is 260k per season.
God you're gullible.
SISU are not interested in playing at the Ricoh at any price. The football club is unimportant to them. Always has been.
How many times does this have to be said to you SISU apologists before it sinks in?
Z
For goodness sake - the £150,000 deal was not offered to the owners but to the administrator. How many times does this have to be said to you before it sinks in?
why dont ACL offer to sell the ground to CCFC at the market value
Rent at Sixfields is 260k per season.
Z
For goodness sake - the £150,000 deal was not offered to the owners but to the administrator. How many times does this have to be said to you before it sinks in?
The offer was made by ACL to the administrator as part of an agreement to agree the terms of the CVA. If the preferred bidder had accepted the terms, the rent being paid by Otium would be to the owners of the Ricoh at the price suggested this season.
Therefore the offer was quite clearly made to the owners of the club once it exited from administration. The offer was made to the Otium and the club.
10 years is the minimum time period allowed by the FL regulations. The agreement was rolling over the 10 year period.
That really should sink in.
The administrator made it quite clear that he could not propose the CVA with ACL's conditions attached. So no, it hasn't sunk in.
Good idea, go public and offer it o them at true value.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?