Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Squad, or the Arena? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter The CableGuy
  • Start date Mar 28, 2011
Forums New posts

Spend £15 million on what?

  • The Arena! Crack open those income streams

    Votes: 51 87.9%
  • The Squad! 1 win in 18 says it all!

    Votes: 7 12.1%

  • Total voters
    58
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

The CableGuy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #1
Assuming that some crazy bloke gave CCFC £15 million, and buying back our share of the Arena cost £15 million, what would you prefer the money to be spent on?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #2
Heart says squad but head says arena!
 
S

SuperFred

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #3
to help us in the long term, it has to be the arena
 
T

The CableGuy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #4
Nick said:
Heart says squad but head says arena!
Click to expand...

Same here. I'm hoping (praying?) that the CT's mega-story is that were buying back our share of the Arena. Anything less then that and I'll be disappointed in the CT, and probably CCFC as well.
 

CovLis86

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #5
Its difficult...aslong as i thought we could stay up for next couple of years, then Arena. But if we dont, well it would have to be squad because if we go down, im not sure we will ever recover.
 
T

The CableGuy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #6
CovLis86 said:
Its difficult...aslong as i thought we could stay up for next couple of years, then Arena. But if we dont, well it would have to be squad because if we go down, im not sure we will ever recover.
Click to expand...

What, you think I'm gonna make my 1st SBT poll easy?

I'd still try to buy back our Arena-share, even if we did go down. I think a Championship club gets around £4 million per season for TV money. A League 1 club only gets £100,000 (they're not too happy about this and frankly, I can't blame them!).

Making additional income from the Arena would go a long way from covering that potential loss, if the Sky Blue Relegation Apocalypse did indeed happen.
 
P

Pigeon

New Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #7
I think it has to be the arena, we'll make profit off the Ricoh to build up the squad.
 

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

New Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #8
Buy back our share in The Ricoh. Then build on that. Hopefully avoiding the drop en route.
 

SkyBlueKay

Facebook User
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #9
I've had to say the arena. It makes more sense! Get the revenue off various things if it was ours, and that in turn could go on players!
 
C

craigus12

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #10
arena because most players seem to under perform when they put on a sky blue shirt
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #11
Arena costs us £1m per season. since it will be £20m to buy the arena I would say take up the 50% offer for 10m and invest £5m in the squad (and none of that on sill wages with long contracts). Should be plenty for a decent manager to have a tilt at getting us up when we can then afford to buy the other 50%.
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #12
These figures you are all bounding around...are you sure?

ACL and the Higgs trust is not the ownership of the arena.

Maybe Wednesday is about a new manager who well....we would never have thought would come here....urmmm who could that be?
 
T

The CableGuy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #13
Lets pay off the last 2 managers first before getting a new sucke-I mean, a new manager in.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #14
Its a chicken and egg scenario......i'd go for the arena get some income in then the squad will follow
 
S

skyblu3sk

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #15
Stuck thread for a while to get the consensus. it's arena for me. will make us a more viable option for a buyer
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #16
It has to be the Arena for me as well. It might just then feel a little more like "home". As it is it just feels like the Memorial park with seats. Mind you, if we were to get relegated I cannot see us ever getting back.
 

hackneyfox

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #17
20m to buy the whole stadium?

Really, I thought it cost in excess of 30m to build?
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #18
hackneyfox said:
20m to buy the whole stadium?

Really, I thought it cost in excess of 30m to build?
Click to expand...
Good evening Hackers; have you not heard about the fall in property prices?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #19
According to Wiki, it cost £113 million to build....
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #20
There is an agreement to buy 50% for £10m until 2015 (the ten year anniversary) after that it's open season. Buying it before then is worthwhile as the new 10 year naming rights will be worth having as you can recoup a % immediately.

Hackers, it cost £113m to build mate, but a lot of that was on cleaning up the site first and the value of the ground it stands on, parking and the whole complex who are also tennants (hotel, casino, arena etc). I guess the actual stadium build costs c(pointless without City playing in it) remain a closely guarded secret like all things CCFC.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #21
Ah as Nick said beat me to it as I was typing
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #22
Nick said:
According to Wiki, it cost £113 million to build....
Click to expand...
Think that figure was taken when Mr. R wanted the retractible roof and all that rubbish.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #23
A figure of around 30 - 40 million rings a bell I think...
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #24
No Tony those are the costs but as I said includes other aspects. The retractable roof, retractable pitch and 45,000 seat plan was when it was all part of Arena 2000 or something
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #25
Was that when it was planned to have a huge Jaguar overlooking too? Until they pulled out!
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #26
I think Jaguar only pulled out of the naming rights as the 'Jaguar Arena' and after build completion not as part iof the build
 

hackneyfox

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #27
Whether it was 30-40m or 113m, who coughed up the money for that and why would they let 50% go for 10m?
 
L

les_miserables

New Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #28
This debate has gone on years back in the Derrick Robins era. Arguments galore at boardroom level and money was spent on the ground, we built 3 stands in 4 years. I have yet to see a grandstand score a goal. Get the team right, then the ground.
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #29
Whatever the cost of the original build I seem to recall that the agreement for sale to higgs incorporated a buy back agreement at a fixed amount. I beleive that the fixed amount was in the region of £10mill. provided it was exercised within a certain period.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #30
les_miserables said:
This debate has gone on years back in the Derrick Robins era. Arguments galore at boardroom level and money was spent on the ground, we built 3 stands in 4 years. I have yet to see a grandstand score a goal. Get the team right, then the ground.
Click to expand...

Thing is though, ploughing the money into the squad is a huge gamble and then if you don't get promote you could end up even more in the brown stuff..
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #31
hackneyfox said:
Whether it was 30-40m or 113m, who coughed up the money for that and why would they let 50% go for 10m?
Click to expand...


If you live in Cov, then you helped pay for it Hackers - thanks

There was a combination of govt funding, lottery commission, City council, Higgs Trust and World cup 2006 bid. I hope that's clear! Who paid what share I have no idea, but it was part of a condition of the sale of ground that we had with the rebuy options at Highfield Road.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #32
Has to be the arena as its a long term view, if we invested in the squad we would end up selling that money would get lose in the ether and back to square one. We need assets at the club!
 
S

SkybluePelsall

New Member
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #33
Arena, at least if knowing we benefitted from turnover that might get a few more up there.
 
S

SkyBluesAndy

Facebook User
  • Mar 30, 2011
  • #34
Arena as its better long term. If the money was spent on the squad you would have to trust whoever was in charge at the time spending it wisely - just look at all the money Mboro wasted on Strachan! Money from the Ricoh would come in for years to come.
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 30, 2011
  • #35
arena let5s look long termimp:
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?