It's a representation of the info from the tabular format where we get a set points of differing values dependant on who we played and relative to their position and points value .
This is shown as % on the graph .
One observation it seems to show wild variation to what I remember.
Maybe that's my mistake and memory .
Or could it be the scale?
It's easy to recognise the significance of the first 9 or so games and ditto for the last.
Would it look more normalised and the ioscillation reduce if the entire league were included .
Is that the discrepancy I can see between this and the other formats .
Less wildly apparent peaks and troughs?