No - just means they are sticking to their usual policyAh well thats ok then. Club's fault.
No - just means they are sticking to their usual policy
...onwards & upwards PUSB
And that's where you risk falling into the trap.I would be happy with clarification off any side.
I've had one of their pies and can assure you it caused much wailing and gnashing of teeth.Maybe I am missing something, but there seems to be a bit of wailing and gnashing of teeth over a very small issue.
And that's where you risk falling into the trap.
SISU come out & clarify things now, you are happy! The fact their 'clarity' will almost certainly be slanted heavily/unreasonably to their own advantage is no nevermind?
...onwards & upwards PUSB
No - blame the owners of CCFCAnd we've been told ACL don't make statements so they're sticking to theirs. So we're all happy then aren't we as both sides are doing what they usually do?
But, if in doubt, say nothing about ACL and blame CCFC. Seems the way it is on here despite beating of breast denials.
There is nothing to comment upon you tit!Any comments on ACL or their lack of a statement? No?
If you don't care about them why don't you ever shut up about them?I wonder why you put it like that ACL blaming SISU and not " what have ACL got to say about this"? But let's be honest no one cares what ACL has to say anyway.
If you don't care about them why don't you ever shut up about them?
There is nothing to comment upon you tit!
...onwards & upwards PUSB
It depends what they are having a go about surely?
There's the difference between the 2, that's my point.
People can blame sisu for something that's down to ccfc and blame ccfc for things that are sisu.
They can blame either or when it's down to acl as well.
Maybe they are trying to protect their customer and not make them look stupid.Again don't disagree but there's two sides to this but people are only interested in one side.
The club made a statement yet the other refuses to comment, yet all we hear is the statement isn't good enough. It's a lose-lose situation. I'm wasting my breath so i will give up now.
OK. Have tried politely all day to reason with you. But all I have got back is you insinuating that I have been blaming CCFC. Would you like to point it out to everyone where I have said anything accusing CCFC of wrongdoing?And we've been told ACL don't make statements so they're sticking to theirs. So we're all happy then aren't we as both sides are doing what they usually do?
But, if in doubt, say nothing about ACL and blame CCFC. Seems the way it is on here despite beating of breast denials.
More information is always better than limited information. And if it is pointed towards someone being at fault they would have the choice of responding or not.And that's where you risk falling into the trap.
SISU come out & clarify things now, you are happy! The fact their 'clarity' will almost certainly be slanted heavily/unreasonably to their own advantage is no nevermind?
...onwards & upwards PUSB
I don't quite get this.
I have never been one to blame Sisu for all and sundry, so think I am reasonably balanced (wife will say otherwise), but.......
ACL don't usually make statements and didn't here.
Sisu did make a statement and it wasn't very clear.
A lot of us would just like clarification. As Sisu are the only ones to make a statement people are suggesting they could have been clearer.
I would love for ACL to make a statement, but that doesn't look like it is going happen.
Maybe I am missing something, but there seems to be a bit of wailing and gnashing of teeth over a very small issue.
But when we attend we are there as customers of CCFC not ACL, I know it's only small but purchases WeAny comments on ACL or their lack of a statement? No?
I wish they bloody would.When you say ACL don't make statements they did about legal noise - or was that wasps holdings? In which case why don't wasps holdings make a statement?
I see you are getting yourself into another pickle Nick. I'm not sure you actually understand yourself anymore!
Compass are struggling as a company so I think it may be so something to do with a change in pricing structureBut when we attend we are there as customers of CCFC not ACL, I know it's only small but purchases We
make while supporting our team are a "revenue stream" to ACL, so seems odd they would prevent it.
SISU in my opinion are cut more slack than their worth, or ever deserved.
And am I wrong in saying that as the only side to have made any sort of comment they could easily expand on what they have said so we have a clue what is going on? Then maybe ACL will have no choice but to make a comment themselves.
There is only so many times you can answer the same question before it gets a bit tedious.Really? You went quiet in the other thread?
There is only so many times you can answer the same question before it gets a bit tedious.
I wish they bloody would.
The company that should make comment and clarify the situation is the company of which We areAnd is it wrong to expect both sides to comment? I have insinuated because you and others have not mentioned ACL, it's all CCFC should say this, they should clarify that, which was my point, but it got lost as so many things do. My last word, we're going around in circles.
The company that should make comment and clarify the situation is the company of which We are
customers, if it's down to Wasps, ACL, or compass then just tell us and we can bitch at them.
The fact they haven't just reflects badly on SISU
You're getting confused.You said they don't but that's rubbish they made statements then.
There is only so many times you can answer the same question before it gets a bit tedious.
It's a shame you are so quick to dismiss people Nick. I know there are people on this thread that know exactly what the problem is with the pies. Unfortunately you find it very hard to listen.Yeah, only so many times you can get corrected.
You're getting confused.
For that reply you just quoted I was talking about Wasps and as for the ACL statement thing, as I clearly said, it wasn't me who said they don't usually make statements it was OSB and I was quoting him.
It's a shame
It's a shame you are so quick to dismiss people Nick. I know there are people on this thread that know exactly what the problem is with the pies. Unfortunately you find it very hard to listen.
So you finally admit that I haven't said it but you have made out that I have because you want ACL to make a comment :banghead:And is it wrong to expect both sides to comment? I have insinuated because you and others have not mentioned ACL, it's all CCFC should say this, they should clarify that, which was my point, but it got lost as so many things do. My last word, we're going around in circles.
It's a shame you are so quick to dismiss people Nick. I know there are people on this thread that know exactly what the problem is with the pies. Unfortunately you find it very hard to listen.
So you finally admit that I haven't said it but you have made out that I have because you want ACL to make a comment :banghead:
Calm down Treacle.Ha, I give up. :banghead:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?