his 1st Tv interview ( i think on Central) he said that SISU weren't necessarily in for the long-term as the funds they were using nornally operated on 5 year cycles which was how long he believed it would take to stabilize the club and make it attractive for new owners.Ranson was pretty open about his plan when he came in and people have repeatedly asked for SISU's plan.
but the point remains can't sell Ryton until a new facility is in place - which would probably cost more than the Ryton income anyway.
You have been misled by Fishers weasel words, there is no requirement to replace what is at Ryton, the only requirement is to provide 2 pitches in the Rugby DC area.but the point remains can't sell Ryton until a new facility is in place - which would probably cost more than the Ryton income anyway.
It may well end up being sold for £1 but the key will be what happens with the debt. Written off, pennies in the pound offer or carried over to the new owners.
Ranson was pretty open about his plan when he came in and people have repeatedly asked for SISU's plan. Problem is you then get Fisher on the radio saying exactly what they plan is and people either don't believe him, which is understandable, or just choose to ignore what he says.
You have been misled by Fishers weasel words, there is no requirement to replace what is at Ryton, the only requirement is to provide 2 pitches in the Rugby DC area.
There are 2 pitches at Ryton.Where was it that it was said about 2 pitches?
There are 2 pitches at Ryton.
So they have said that only 2 pitches need to be replaced and that's it?
If its too hard he can't understand it.RBC state that pitch provision has to be replaced as stated by sports England before the site can be developed and that's it. I'm sure you can do the maths yourself
RBC state that pitch provision has to be replaced as stated by sports England before the site can be developed and that's it. I'm sure you can do the maths yourself
If its too hard he can't understand it.
Was that in the local plan or a statement they made?
It will still be down to translation anyway won't it? Unless Wasps are literally going to put up a couple of football pitches somewhere else for the one lost.
For the record, I can't see a state of the art training centre going up. It will be something at a uni or somewhere.
https://www.rugby.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/1170/ryton-on-dunsmore_-_addendum.pdf
Here you go Nick. Under Site Conclusion on the last page "relocation of sports pitches to an alternative site". That is the only provision.
It is up to SISU to safeguard the clubs training facilities. Nobody else has any responsibility to do anything.Cheers! There's not been much pressure on Rugby Council or Sport England to safeguard it as yet or demand more guarantees.
It is up to SISU to safeguard the clubs training facilities. Nobody else has any responsibility to do anything.
Cheers! There's not been much pressure on Rugby Council or Sport England to safeguard it as yet or demand more guarantees.
k -OK then, must have missed the fans protesting then over something that isn't their responsibility. Probably in the same place your replies to my PMs and posts in the thread are.
Nick - Trust has put in FOI requests and clarification requests to RBC about this matter but to date they have been totally unforthcoming with answers. Is it a simple case of replacing the Ryton pitches with any old 2 pitches elsewhere or is it a facility replacement - lack of response makes you worry that its the former. Sports England have been equally uncooperative.-
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?