Some poor calls particularly 4th quarter on Flowers.I wonder who’s orders the officials acted on to cost the Lions that game...
Twats
LOL U WOT BRUV?Still going to lose the game and the top spot in the division to the lions next week.
“One bit of luck” more like just one out of 3 awful second half penalties to have not been called on our defence. Not to mention the missed DPI on Green Bay in the 4th.Some poor calls particularly 4th quarter on Flowers.
General lack of consistency all season as different groups of officials interpret rules differently.
Lions need that one bit of luck to give them a signature win and get the ball rolling. Way better team under Patricia and always improving.
So the fact that Green Bay made errors means the better team won?LOL U WOT BRUV?
what a game! GB always give us good MNF
a huge win vs a divisional rival but also overcoming our own mistakes with so many fumbles and turnovers.. the defence came up good limiting lions to FG on about 4 seperate drives that could easily have been TD. they even nearly stopped the TD on line of scrimmage, so encouraging
all this without devante adams and also what many see as a weak reciever core anyway, AR is making it work
now jamaal williams has broke out as a genuine 2nd running back its very exciting, as philly won superbowl when they had the engluish adoji RB and one other good one but i forget names
yes some facemask calls went our favour no doubt so a bit of luck, but if had not many bad self made errors we prob would have won regardless so better team won
5-1 but only 2 away games so far. need 5 more win minimum from remaining 10. but all about improving week in week out.
go pack go!
stop being butt hurt.So the fact that Green Bay made errors means the better team won?
How does that make any sense?
thought that wasn't an acceptable excuse when Vikings blew it against the Packersstop being butt hurt.
lions were only in game due to packer errors, so shudnt look to just the bad calls solely
just admit you got it wrong
refresh my memory hombrethought that wasn't an acceptable excuse when Vikings blew it against the Packers
Well you not addressing my question means you accept that your previous point made no sense.stop being butt hurt.
lions were only in game due to packer errors, so shudnt look to just the bad calls solely
just admit you got it wrong
And I’m not being “butt hurt”stop being butt hurt.
lions were only in game due to packer errors, so shudnt look to just the bad calls solely
just admit you got it wrong
I think its a long term plan with both LA teams, once they've both moved in and get properly set up in the LA community they'll start to build a fan base. As with any franchise move it'll take time and will be "tourist clubs" for the first 10-15 years but if both stick around LA/Cali has a big enough population to keep two franchises going. Issue at the moment is that most LA residents likely have their own team that they supported before moving to LA, they will need to attract the next generation.strange one.
Were getting average 60k in San Diego.
Couldn't get help from council building a new stadium. Ownership panicked when Rams announced return to LA as they claimed large part of their fanbase was from southern LA area. Was all messy along the lines were going to do a deal with Raiders then Raiders said they were off to Vegas (again couldn't get the council to pay for new stadium).
By default ended up with a deal from the Rams.
Got to wonder whether the Raiders become like the Rams with large numbers of "away" fans making up the crowds as part of weekend packages etc.
hen I sometimes end up being proven right and you just cant bring yourselves to admit you were wrongYOU SAID THEY WOULD LOSE AND THEY WON
then i always end up being proven right and you just cant bring yourselves to admit you were wrong
he then said wont win superbowl lmao
lol anyone can be nostradmus if they can keep changing predictionhen I sometimes end up being proven right and you just cant bring yourselves to admit you were wrong
he then said wont win superbowl lmao - he was right.
I didn’t say that while the game was on, I said it a full week before the game actually.YOU SAID THEY WOULD LOSE AND THEY WON
admit you were wrong ffs
this is whats annoying about this thread, so many of you post whilst games are on acting like you know about the sport and then i always end up being proven right and you just cant bring yourselves to admit you were wrong
you said gb would lose, they won
few years ago someone said packers wouldnt make playoffs,they did! he then change dit to they won win a playoff game, they did! he then said wont win superbowl lmao
rivalry is fine, but dont let it make you a c**t of a poster mate
OmgI didn’t say that while the game was on, I said it a full week before the game actually.
On another note, an interesting change of subject from you. You called me butt hurt when really, my complaints were legitimate. Now you’re making a general complaint in a personal way when it has nothing to do with me.
Weather conditions are awful. Hardly a pass to be found.Skins-49ers seems lively 0-0 at H T
Seriously though thought Redskins would struggle against an impressive 49ers
ah my lot look nice and warm and dry in the Ford ArenaWeather conditions are awful. Hardly a pass to be found.
It's the Puddle Bowl.
Tacklers struggle to hold him yet he's not the biggest of RBs. Contrast him to Murray (who we had last year) who bulldozed through Bears last night.No one told me about the force field that repels tackles around Dalvin Cook
If Mahomes out you should win the 2 road games. Chiefs defence poor despite major overhaul.packers 6-1
would take 1-2 in next 3 before bye though.
packers 6-1
would take 1-2 in next 3 before bye though.
ahhh a fellow cheesehead?Chiefs are missing Mahomes, it's absolutely the best time to play them, hopefully that will be a win.
Then it's the Chargers, who are misfiring, and it will be like a home game in that stadium.
Panthers is a tough one to call. Could go either way. If we can stop McCaffrey we'll win.
Think we'll win at least 2. The toughest game is coming out the bye against the 49ers.
case for Wilson playing the best football of his careerSeahawks are 5-2 which is both better than the same stage last year and better than I was anticipating, don't mind defeats when they're against better teams which was the case with the Saints and Ravens, plus one was a close call and the other by stupid defensive errors which aren't all that common.
ahhh a fellow cheesehead?
mahomes out is a biggie yes
ok taking into account 49ers game then yes we really do need to go 2-2 in next 4
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?