Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The new signings so far (13 Viewers)

  • Thread starter stevefloyd
  • Start date Dec 12, 2024
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #106
TomRad85 said:
I'm going to go through the entire league with all signings that required a fee and people can weigh up the average cost of bringing a player to the Championship and also whether our signings are significantly better/worse than the others. Can only do 10 at a time so bear with. Some of these look a little bit off (see Binks) but its the best i can find.

View attachment 40246
View attachment 40247
View attachment 40248
View attachment 40249
View attachment 40250
View attachment 40251
View attachment 40252
View attachment 40253
View attachment 40254
View attachment 40255
Click to expand...

Yeah but we always have this discussion with public info. You have to explain why we would be more or less off than anyone else on average otherwise it’s fine.


The screenshot I posted is expenditures vs league position. We are fourth from bottom. If you combined it with last season I’d imagine we’re even worse.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #107
skybluecam said:
It's stupid to make a verdict on signings before we've even hit Jan. EMC made this thread look silly on Saturday.

BTA and Binks are the only ones you can attempt to argue are "misses", the others are just far too premature.
Click to expand...
It’s equally premature with EMC and BTA, they’ve played almost exactly the same number of minutes. Why deliver a verdict on one and not the other?
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #108









 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #109


 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #110
shmmeee said:
Yeah but we always have this discussion with public info. You have to explain why we would be more or less off than anyone else on average otherwise it’s fine.


The screenshot I posted is expenditures vs league position. We are fourth from bottom. If you combined it with last season I’d imagine we’re even worse.
Click to expand...
Well yes, that's why we got rid of the manager. Certain players look immediately better for it tbh but we've done that to death and certain people won't accept it so whats the point.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #111
TomRad85 said:
Well yes, that's why we got rid of the manager. Certain players look immediately better for it tbh but we've done that to death and certain people won't accept it so whats the point.
Click to expand...

Yeah we’re arguing about whether this squad is top six or midtable with an average manager I guess.

And because you’ve come over all covcity4life expecting us to pick up a decent amount of points against the bottom four doesn’t negate me saying I think we’ve assembled a midtable squad. (Which a game before Robins sacking was higher than it’s been since (13th) just saying).

I think Robins would have had to add to this deck to get it to top six, I think Lampard will too.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #112
shmmeee said:
Yeah we’re arguing about whether this squad is top six or midtable with an average manager I guess.

And because you’ve come over all covcity4life expecting us to pick up a decent amount of points against the bottom four doesn’t negate me saying I think we’ve assembled a midtable squad. (Which a game before Robins sacking was higher than it’s been since (13th) just saying).

I think Robins would have had to add to this deck to get it to top six, I think Lampard will too.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to go into all this as i think you've taken us off track. We're talking about the players as individuals, the ones we've paid money for and you suggesting they were overpriced. When you look at the players as individuals vs other players that have come into the league for a fee have we been massively ripped off vs other clubs? I've posted it all above and people can come to their own conclusions.
 
Last edited: Dec 17, 2024

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #113
Let’s be honest, and I know there’s a significant degree of irony considering my comments thus far about EMC, but it is way too early to write anyone off or class them as a success yet.

last year simms was the worst striker in the league, then the best and off to Bournemouth or Brentford for £20m, and now he’s back to being shipped off
 
Reactions: Lamps and Jamesimus

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #114
Ccfcisparks said:
Let’s be honest, and I know there’s a significant degree of irony considering my comments thus far about EMC, but it is way too early to write anyone off or class them as a success yet.

last year simms was the worst striker in the league, then the best and off to Bournemouth or Brentford for £20m, and now he’s back to being shipped off
Click to expand...
Simms is probably the weirdest player we own. Just want to prod him with a stick and say "be good again."
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and blunted

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #115
TomRad85 said:
Simms is probably the weirdest player we own. Just want to prod him with a stick and say "be good again."
Click to expand...
I think give him a consecutive run of games he will be much better. Problem is this season he’s been chopped and changed so many times.

I still stick by when Wright is back we play Wright Simms Sakamoto
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #116
SBT said:
It’s equally premature with EMC and BTA, they’ve played almost exactly the same number of minutes. Why deliver a verdict on one and not the other?
Click to expand...
BTA is looking like a miss because he doesn't have a place in the squad. Right now he might even be 4th choice in his favoured position.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #117
TomRad85 said:
I'm not going to go into all this as i think you've taken us off track. We're talking about the players as individuals, the ones we've paid money for and you suggesting they were overpriced. When you look at the players as individuals vs other players that have come into the league for a fee have we been massively ripped off vs other clubs? I've posted it all above and people can come to their own conclusions.
Click to expand...

Yeah. You posted the source data to the aggregate I posted. The one which shows us 4th from bottom in the value league. WTF?

That says we should be 6th with this squad. I disagree and don’t think this is a top six squad as is. You do I assume?
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #118
skybluecam said:
BTA is looking like a miss because he doesn't have a place in the squad. Right now he might even be 4th choice in his favoured position.
Click to expand...
I thought it was premature to be making these kinds of judgments?

I don’t think EMC is first choice in his favoured position either.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #119
shmmeee said:
Yeah. You posted the source data to the aggregate I posted. The one which shows us 4th from bottom in the value league. WTF?

That says we should be 6th with this squad. I disagree and don’t think this is a top six squad as is. You do I assume?
Click to expand...
You're arguing something completely different again. Individual players mate, that's what we're talking about. Are the costs of certain individuals that you seem to think are overpriced particularly better/worse than other teams in the league? Above I've pasted all players that cost money that came into The Championship.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #120
shmmeee said:
But are they worth £5m a piece? Is Kitching? Are our fringe players worth £2m a time?
Click to expand...
Probably, all transfer fees are inflated nowadays. We paid in and around £1 million for another teams fringe striker in L1 (Chaplin).

A winger having 30+ goal contributions is worth £4.25m without a doubt. Rudoni is in a similar boat, he underperformed his numbers and was a standout player in a Championship team. In fact, had we sold COH for £8-10m in Jan there would’ve been a mutiny so clearly we value our players just as highly as other teams.

Kitching, came from one of the best defences in L1 and has Chanpionship experience. Even if that signing doesn’t work out, the logic was strong.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #121
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Probably, all transfer fees are inflated nowadays. We paid in and around £1 million for another teams fringe striker in L1 (Chaplin).

A winger having 30+ goal contributions is worth £4.25m without a doubt. Rudoni is in a similar boat, he underperformed his numbers and was a standout player in a Championship team. In fact, had we sold COH for £8-10m in Jan there would’ve been a mutiny so clearly we value our players just as highly as other teams.

Kitching, came from one of the best defences in L1 and has Chanpionship experience. Even if that signing doesn’t work out, the logic was strong.
Click to expand...
Its filtering down. Championship clubs ask big money for their better players these days so when they come shopping in league 1 and lesser known foreign leagues, those teams will want their slice of the pie.
Makes sense, you can't have it both ways.
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #122
TomRad85 said:
Its filtering down. Championship clubs ask big money for their better players these days so when they come shopping in league 1 and lesser known foreign leagues, those teams will want their slice of the pie.
Makes sense, you can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...

Then I’m again asking why we appear at the top of the L1 fees lists and the bottom of the total transfer spend value lists.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #123
SBT said:
I thought it was premature to be making these kinds of judgments?

I don’t think EMC is first choice in his favoured position either.
Click to expand...
No, he's second choice. Which is fine, you need 2 players for every position.

You don't need a 4th choice striker when we only play with 1.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #124
shmmeee said:
Then I’m again asking why we appear at the top of the L1 fees lists and the bottom of the total transfer spend value lists.
Click to expand...
You're completely avoiding what we're talking about, presumably on purpose. The fact we stupidly left ourselves short in a couple of areas has nothing to do with the overall quality of player and using the occasional miss like Liam Kitching as a stick to beat all signings with is strange.
To answer your question I think outside of the defence, looking at the teams in the top 6, we have a top 6 squad, so from that you can assume i think most of our signings are good enough.
We won't get in the top 6 because...
A. As I said, the defence needs surgery.
B. We've given ourselves way too much to do with a truly minging start and we need to give the new manager time to get his ideas across.
On balance I would not swap our squad for teams in and around the top 6 like Watford or Blackburn for example.

If you have a different opinion that's fine, I suppose people are bored of reading this.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #125
skybluecam said:
No, he's second choice. Which is fine, you need 2 players for every position.

You don't need a 4th choice striker when we only play with 1.
Click to expand...
And yet he has the same amount of minutes as Ephron!

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t rate the guy either, just curious about the double standard.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #126
SBT said:
And yet he has the same amount of minutes as Ephron!

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t rate the guy either, just curious about the double standard.
Click to expand...
Because he's played out of position a lot. It's not a double standard, me calling him a miss is less about his ability and more the decision to sign him - that £2.5m would have been better spent on an actual winger to compete with Sakamoto.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #127
skybluecam said:
Because he's played out of position a lot. It's not a double standard, me calling him a miss is less about his ability and more the decision to sign him - that £2.5m would have been better spent on an actual winger to compete with Sakamoto.
Click to expand...
Another raid on Peterborough for Poku? Turns out those League 1 wingers aren't all that bad if you give them a chance.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #128
skybluecam said:
Because he's played out of position a lot. It's not a double standard, me calling him a miss is less about his ability and more the decision to sign him - that £2.5m would have been better spent on an actual winger to compete with Sakamoto.
Click to expand...
That's already been resolved, Raphael is his backup and Fabio has also played there for us. The fact Raphael has been injured is just one of those unfortunate things that has to be endured.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and Perennial Lurker
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #129
skybluecam said:
Because he's played out of position a lot. It's not a double standard, me calling him a miss is less about his ability and more the decision to sign him - that £2.5m would have been better spent on an actual winger to compete with Sakamoto.
Click to expand...
We had no senior striker cover when we signed him - the deal made total sense at the time in isolation.

Mason-Clark has also been played out of position a lot btw. I would have thought that would make you more reluctant, not less, to make a judgment on the player, but always interesting to see which players are afforded patience and which ones are written off.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #130
Captain Dart said:
That's already been resolved, Raphael is his backup and Fabio has also played there for us. The fact Raphael has been injured is just one of those unfortunate things that has to be endured.
Click to expand...
Tbh we know nothing about Raphael and whether he'll even get close to the standard required. He was a punt that cost peanuts.
Needs time in the U21s and no pressure.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #131
TomRad85 said:
Another raid on Peterborough for Poku? Turns out those League 1 wingers aren't all that bad if you give them a chance.
Click to expand...

I did wonder whether we’d maybe signed the wrong winger. Poku seems to be having a lovely old time of it this season and at 23 you’d imagine quite a lot of improvement to come.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #132
SBAndy said:
I did wonder whether we’d maybe signed the wrong winger. Poku seems to be having a lovely old time of it this season and at 23 you’d imagine quite a lot of improvement to come.
Click to expand...
Quality player. I did check up on him when he just came back to my mind though and he's out for 3 months.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #133
TomRad85 said:
You're completely avoiding what we're talking about, presumably on purpose. The fact we stupidly left ourselves short in a couple of areas has nothing to do with the overall quality of player and using the occasional miss like Liam Kitching as a stick to beat all signings with is strange.
To answer your question I think outside of the defence, looking at the teams in the top 6, we have a top 6 squad, so from that you can assume i think most of our signings are good enough.
We won't get in the top 6 because...
A. As I said, the defence needs surgery.
B. We've given ourselves way too much to do with a truly minging start and we need to give the new manager time to get his ideas across.
On balance I would not swap our squad for teams in and around the top 6 like Watford or Blackburn for example.

If you have a different opinion that's fine, I suppose people are bored of reading this.
Click to expand...

I think we’ve left ourselves short because we’ve overspent. The rumoured big money signings for midfield it seems were contingency if sheaf went more than additions. And some of those we’ve signed are going to need to be replaced. Kitching at the back, probably Torp in the middle, and really we only need two of Simms/Bassette/BTA.

I think the lack of quality in goalkeeper, defence and midfield costs us top six. For £45m that’s poor.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #134
shmmeee said:
I think we’ve left ourselves short because we’ve overspent. The rumoured big money signings for midfield it seems were contingency if sheaf went more than additions. And some of those we’ve signed are going to need to be replaced. Kitching at the back, probably Torp in the middle, and really we only need two of Simms/Bassette/BTA.

I think the lack of quality in goalkeeper, defence and midfield costs us top six. For £45m that’s poor.
Click to expand...
We're arguing different points though. I think most the players we've signed are good and i very much disagree on Torp, quality player imo.

I'd agree that the Kitching and the BTA money however could have been better spent, most certainly, its a decent chunk of money for the 2 and could certainly have been better used. It is what it is though, its done and players shouldn't be judged as some bulk spend. Individually most of them are decent.

Individually Haji Wright makes up the largest amount of the £45 million and i wouldn't even say he was overpriced. One of the best forwards in the league for me.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, Grendel and Sick Boy

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #135
Captain Dart said:
That's already been resolved, Raphael is his backup and Fabio has also played there for us. The fact Raphael has been injured is just one of those unfortunate things that has to be endured.
Click to expand...
From all accounts Raphael was nowhere near ready to play regularly in the Championship, injury or not. And Tavares has barely played in the league.

Anyway.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #136
TomRad85 said:
Its filtering down. Championship clubs ask big money for their better players these days so when they come shopping in league 1 and lesser known foreign leagues, those teams will want their slice of the pie.
Makes sense, you can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...
Exactly, let’s be honest, the fees we got for Vik and Hamer were inflated by historical standards, particularly as they both had 12 months on their contract.

I feel Vik was still slightly undervalued but given the context of him wanting to leave and his expiring contract, we got a great deal.

Anyway, people just expect to pick up £1m bargains all the time as if they’re easy to pick up. If it was easy everyone would be doing it.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve and TomRad85

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #137
Captain Dart said:
Worse than you hoped for but the chances of him being ready for the subs bench before early Jan were always slim in my opinion. I still hope Wilson will be available for at least the bench for the Sheff Weds cup tie.
Click to expand...

"Worse than you hope for"

Don't know how you got their idea, don't wish any player to have a worse injury
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #138
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Exactly, let’s be honest, the fees we got for Vik and Hamer were inflated by historical standards, particularly as they both had 12 months on their contract.

I feel Vik was still slightly undervalued but given the context of him wanting to leave and his expiring contract, we got a great deal.

Anyway, people just expect to pick up £1m bargains all the time as if they’re easy to pick up. If it was easy everyone would be doing it.
Click to expand...
Yeh quite. Everyone wants the next Vik and Hamer but its not that easy is it, otherwise everyone would be at it. There's a huge element of luck involved too.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, Jamesimus, CCFCSteve and 2 others

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #139
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT said:
"Worse than you hope for"

Don't know how you got their idea, don't wish any player to have a worse injury
Click to expand...
You have got the meaning back to front lad, you hoped the injury was less serious than it was so it was worse than you'd hoped for.
 

blunted

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 17, 2024
  • #140
Mucca Mad Boys said:
No, it’s called having patience. It’s an annual occasion where new signings are derided as ‘poor buys’ or ‘not good enough’ to then be subsequently proven wrong later on in the season.

Too many people say ‘I’ve seen enough of ‘x’ player’ what they actually mean is that they can’t shake off their first impressions.

Just look at how positively Bassette is viewed as a striker with 1 goal in 11 (and should have 3-4 easily) compared to say Simms last season over the start of his season.
Click to expand...
Agreed, it was a compliment.
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?