Anyhow. The chlorinated chicken debate goes on. The US saying one thing and the NFU saying another.
US attacks chlorinated chicken 'myth'
UK says it won't cut food standards for US
Do you ever buy bagged salad?
That may be so but they’re still taking measures to protect the rights of British citizens. It also debunks the sovereignty argument somewhat given Spain are making this sovereign decision by themselves with no interference from the EU.
I don't think you mentioned animal welfare before nor has anyone else banging on about chlorinated chicken.My issue isn’t actually the chlorine. It’s animal welfare. To start of with animal farming is cruel regardless of where in the world it is but the reason that they wash their chicken in chlorine is because in America the chicken can live it’s whole short miserable life swimming in raw untreated sewage and so long as it’s washed in chlorine it’s classed suitable for consumption. They have a single hit approach to the cleanliness of animal welfare whereas the European standard is that it’s a constant process throughout their life. That’s my issue.
I don't think you mentioned animal welfare before nor has anyone else banging on about chlorinated chicken.
I don't think you mentioned animal welfare before nor has anyone else banging on about chlorinated chicken.
The danger of course is that these practices become widespread in the U.K. to compete with cheap American imports and then that effects our exports.
That is an unsubstantiated scare story. The market will not stand it and exports to Europe will continue to conform to European standards or better.
That is an unsubstantiated scare story. The market will not stand it and exports to Europe will continue to conform to European standards or better.
Try again.That’s bending the truth quite a bit. The rights of citizens has been a key bargaining chip of the UK, which shows just how weak the UK’s hand has been.
Try again.
We wanted to talk about rights. But only how much we owed the EU for leaving and what would happen with Ireland were the only subjects allowed.
That is the same as when someone says our standards will lower when we leave the EU. They ignore that we already have standards better than most EU countries.What are next weeks lottery numbers please?
That is the same as when someone says our standards will lower when we leave the EU. They ignore that we already have standards better than most EU countries.
Why can't we keep this to the truth?
We won't even be leaving altogether so will have to keep up with EU standards as a minimum but I suppose point scoring is more important than anything else.
No they weren’t, to try and claim the UK was all for citizens retaining current rights and a top priority is an outright lie.
Logically flawed, morally indefensible: EU citizens in the UK are bargaining chips
Are they?
The EU continues to not want to talk on the matter
Tusk urged to meet MPs on citizens' rights
I suppose your link is true though as it is a anti Brexit blog.
Yes skipped 2 and half years to right now. Would you like me to bring up several links where the EU has refused to talk to us on citizens rights?First you’ve skipped from several years ago to this week.
As has already been said, indivual countries are setting their own rules on what happens in the event of no deal.
It’s connected to the London School of Economics...and this is coming from someone posting links to Guido Fawkes.
LOL.
Yes skipped 2 and half years to right now. Would you like me to bring up several links where the EU has refused to talk to us on citizens rights?
We are happy to give rights to those countries that replicate a deal. But no country can come to a deal with us as it has to be a deal through the EU. And Spain isn't the first or only country offering it to residents without the EU saying so.
Did you not read it? It is how it explains itself.
But not ratified by the EU like it should be as they refuse to do so until this stage of Brexit is complete. So if it was up to them a no deal would mean everyone loses their rights to stay where they have moved to.The deal has been agreed by the 27 countries and it has been agreed that each country can decide for themselves on what to do in the event of no deal.
No. Being truthful and the truth goes against what you are saying.Doing your useful childish nonsense to distract away from the content of the article and the various rejections by MPs.
That is the same as when someone says our standards will lower when we leave the EU. They ignore that we already have standards better than most EU countries.
Why can't we keep this to the truth?
We won't even be leaving altogether so will have to keep up with EU standards as a minimum but I suppose point scoring is more important than anything else.
But not ratified by the EU like it should be as they refuse to do so until this stage of Brexit is complete. So if it was up to them a no deal would mean everyone loses their rights to stay where they have moved to.
But as usual the excuses come out for the EU. You won't have anything said that could be seen against them.
No. Being truthful and the truth goes against what you are saying.
Take it you have read the link properly now.
Rejections from MP's? So you have now ignored the latest link on the subject.
American food is shit.
Don’t know why. Don’t care why. It’s fucking terrible.
Just another reason why leaders of countries in the EU want to take power off those who somehow have ended up running the project.
Which leaders are those then?
No SB. I am pointing out your incorrect facts. You have already changed what you were saying yet still make out it was me that was wrong.It’s part of the withdrawal agreement and no it wouldn’t as it is encouraging countries to decide for themselves ffs.
I’m just pointing out that you’re coming out with twisted ‘facts’.
Come on SB you are better than this. You don't need to twist the truth to get a point across.Which one? Your link that has already been discussed and countries deciding for themselves after being agreed by the 27?
You were the one who claimed that guaranteeing rights was a top priority for the UK
Who said the EU have had nothing to do with it?That may be so but they’re still taking measures to protect the rights of British citizens. It also debunks the sovereignty argument somewhat given Spain are making this sovereign decision by themselves with no interference from the EU.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?