Astute
Well-Known Member
Deliberate smears and lies?
Your posts disappeared?
I'm glad you never come out with bullshit about me :shifty:
Deliberate smears and lies?I don’t know where the post is. I explained several times that the second report came whilst I was working. I corrected myself as soon as I got the verdict. You still haven’t apologized for your deliberate smears and lies.
I haven't lost it.
I detest liars and lying. Look at Mart still trying to make out that there was nothing wrong with the appointment of Selmayr. Look at what else he comes out with. I can understand a mistake. But a year later coming out with the same diatribe? Then others agree with what he says.
It is an absolute joke.
Deliberate smears and lies?
Your posts disappeared?
I'm glad you never come out with bullshit about me :shifty:
I repeat my advice to Astute.If my post disappeared, check with Nick, but don’t call me a liar. Yes deliberate smears and lies. That is what you constantly do. You are being constantly called out on here by others for twisting.
Yes you gave an excuse on why you voted UKIP. What was your excuse for the racist remarks?
And coming in from the side...12 minutes and counting.....
How about showing evidence for once or stop digging a bigger hole. So what if you made wrong comments. The worse is you feel as though you have to keep them up.
I repeat my advice to Astute.
For the love of Pete, make it stop!
C'mon now, give it a break. You've made your point - move on!He‘ll deny that he loves Pete and say he hates liars.
C'mon now, give it a break. You've made your point - move on!
My rabid accusations that both enquiries agreed on you mean? And MEP's voting for Selmayr to go. Only 12 voting for Selmayr out of over 500 and 10 of them were affiliated to Selmayr and Juncker?
So now you admit that what you call rabid accusations that I come out with are actually the truth. But those who run the EU still try to say nothing was wrong although two enquiries have found it to be wrong in law as well as procedures.
So let me get this straight. Are we saying that if we can confirm that Churchill was indeed a war criminal and would have been tried by the Nazis that could seal May's deal with the EU?
I had a terrible nightmare. I had a day off, and instead of doing something productive, I wasted my time reading a ridiculous thread as two anonymous people on the internet bored the world with circular repetitive chat and identical insults to one another:banghead:
I might go and buy some Bratwurst later. Quite fancy a large sausage.
No euphemisms in there, either!
I am going to stop now
It’s like an episode of Allo Allo
1, The second report agreed with the first report.No I don’t. I still say you were wrong to say the law was broken according to the ombudswoman‘s first report. Those running the EU have to accept the final report. Twisting again.
1, The second report agreed with the first report.
2, If the EU has accepted the second report why does he still hold the position he shouldn't have got? Even you said it was good news that everyone would be able to see how transparent the EU is if Selmayr resigns. Then I pointed out to you that it was last year and he was still in the position.
Yet you call it rabid anti EU rants still from when I said his appointment was against EU rules and regulations. The Ombudsman went even further and said it was also against EU law.
Don't you start!In typical Mart fashion he lied
It’s like an episode of Allo Allo
AmenChrist alive.
Me leave it?1. the second report went mich further than the first one. As you admit in point 2.
2. the EU has to accept the report. He has probably got employment rights and probably will appeal. The EU elections are coming up, so I presume noowill happen until Juncker‘s successot takes over.
But, you can read about how binding the report is on the internet.
Now leave it.
Me leave it?
That is the problem I have with you. You come out with your version of events and don't like it when you get corrected. You had just said about my rabid comments about Selmayr. The comments that were proven by two investigations.
Employment law? Is this another barrel to scrape? He shouldn't have got the position. The only people who think he should keep it are those who gave him the position. MEP's who you say give us a say in the EU spoke. They said he should go. They got ignored. All leaders of the countries that make up the EU want change. But guess what. Those who run the show and carry on as usual even when getting caught out refuse to change. Even you sometimes admit reform in the EU is needed.
But it is all OK because you have come out with the idea that employment law makes it OK. But strangely enough those in the know never mentioned a word about it.
FFS. You got the last bit wrong.
He is an employee not a politician, which means he has rights. IMO he won’t be going anywhere before the EU elections, because the new EC President will have to nominate a successor if he goes.
Nowhere have I said that makes it all ok.
More lies.
MEPs are not his direct employers and can only ask him to resign. The same as in any parliament. The civil servants are employees. MEPs can legislate. That is not the same as running the civil service.
Everyone in every government wants change, but it takes time and discussion. That’s the same in the EU as in the UK. Nothing unusual.
Your comments were wrong at the time you made them because the objections had not been considered.
You haven’t corrected me. I have corrected you, as usual. More lies.
He is an employee? Oh Mart.FFS. You got the last bit wrong.
He is an employee not a politician, which means he has rights. IMO he won’t be going anywhere before the EU elections, because the new EC President will have to nominate a successor if he goes.
Nowhere have I said that makes it all ok.
More lies.
MEPs are not his direct employers and can only ask him to resign. The same as in any parliament. The civil servants are employees. MEPs can legislate. That is not the same as running the civil service.
Everyone in every government wants change, but it takes time and discussion. That’s the same in the EU as in the UK. Nothing unusual.
Your comments were wrong at the time you made them because the objections had not been considered.
You haven’t corrected me. I have corrected you, as usual. More lies.
He is an employee? Oh Mart.
He is now the strongest person in the EU. The job is his for as long as he wants. 99% agree he should go. This includes those in the EU. He has been voted against. His appointment was against EU law. His appointment was against EU rules. His appointment was against EU regulations.
You even Saud it would be best if he went as it would show that the EU is transparent. So do you agree now that the EU isn't transparent?
Of course you won't. All the leaders of the countries in the EU want to take their power back. They have had enough of those who hand each other jobs telling them what they must do.
But you make excuses for this.
You ask me if I think we should be in the EU. I say I think we are better off in the EU. But if it all comes crashing down we would most probably be better off out of it. And things are not going well.
But what do you expect when it is run by those who care about other things than what is best for the people of the EU. Nobody wants them to run the EU but themselves.
Haha. You realise you're just egging then on. This is a juggernaut rolling downhill with no brakes.C'mon now, give it a break. You've made your point - move on!
Pull your hand off your knob then.Trying to. Every time I think it is over, comes the next smear.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?