You are not in discussion with me? Is that because I asked for the evidence on you keep saying that the Nazis said they would take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal? This was the only thing you wanted to talk about yet it wasn't true.Hitler was a Nazi.
Hitler was in charge.
Hitler classed Churchill as a war criminal. Also as a drunken demagogue.
The only reason I am involved in this is because I answered questions from other people.
As for the rest I have no idea what you are on about. I am not in a discussion with you.
You are not in discussion with me? Is that because I asked for the evidence on you keep saying that the Nazis said they would take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal? This was the only thing you wanted to talk about yet it wasn't true.
Isn't it strange how you want to end a conversation when caught out lying yet again. And you say you were not even in one when you kept quoting my posts and expecting a reply.
You are not in discussion with me? Is that because I asked for the evidence on you keep saying that the Nazis said they would take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal? This was the only thing you wanted to talk about yet it wasn't true.
Isn't it strange how you want to end a conversation when caught out lying yet again. And you say you were not even in one when you kept quoting my posts and expecting a reply.
I see that the pound has rallied to a 21 month high today off the back of the news that the chances are that Brexit will be delayed. Typically I ordered some Euro’s yesterday.
You are not in discussion with me? Is that because I asked for the evidence on you keep saying that the Nazis said they would take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal? This was the only thing you wanted to talk about yet it wasn't true.
Isn't it strange how you want to end a conversation when caught out lying yet again. And you say you were not even in one when you kept quoting my posts and expecting a reply.
Would you like me to bring your posts up? Are you denying that you based it all on the Nazis having said they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal?According to you I said loads of other things.
So now you are trying to twist your way out of your lies.No it isn’t strange after your series of rants and abuse and false statements about me. Lies lies lies and twisting things around or not even understanding what you read due to comprehension difficulties.
Then you accuse me of lying without any proof. Do you seriously believe Hitler didn’t count Churchill as a war criminal?
Would you like me to bring your posts up? Are you denying that you based it all on the Nazis having said they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal?
Here is a post that you now seemed to have deleted Mart. Just a shame that I had already quoted you.
There was one question and I answered it. The Nazis would have tried Churchill as a war criminal. That is what they said they would do.
I asked you for proof. You was supposed to be too tired to answer. But not too tired to come out with other crap.
Is that right? You said you only wanted to talk about Churchill being a war criminal because the Nazis said they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal.Based on all what? One answer about the Nazis view of Churchill.
One answer about bombing being the reason for some Germans claiming that Churchill and Harris are war criminals.
The rest was invented by yourself.
You seem to hate Germans, are pro death penalty, pro carpet bombing of German citizens, against FOM, for stripping citizens of statehood and against most things labour stand for including international cooperation.
You claim to be a remainer, neutral as regards Brexit and a labour supporter. You accredit me with such things as stating that the Nazi crimes and bombings didn’t happen, were done by over zealous commanders, that the UK was worse than the Nazis, that I asked hypothetical questions about Churchill and that I always attack the UK and stick up for Germany.
A stack of lies and twisting. Then you accuse me of being a liar without proof and say that you are only interested in the truth.
That would be funny if it wasn’t so batshit crazy.
So where is the post that I quoted you on? You know...... where you said the Nazis actually said they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal. The one I copied a couple of posts ago from where I quoted you.I haven’t deleted anything. Another shameful lie from you.
I went to bed after I said I was tired. You continued your lies without me.
Nearly all politicians are liars. When are you going to learn?
So where is the post that I quoted you on? You know...... where you said the Nazis actually said they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal. The one I copied a couple of posts ago from where I quoted you.
So where is the post that I quoted you on? You know...... where you said the Nazis actually said they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal. The one I copied a couple of posts ago from where I quoted you.
Anyway... a group of Germans from Kiel are coming on an exchange visit to Coventry in September to keep the city partnership alive, continue the work on reconciliation started after the war, create new relationships and friendships between Germans and British and to enjoy the hospitality of both sides of the exchange.
They are a good example of creating opportunities for peace and cooperation.
Compared to your rants and your rage against anything remotely German, and Grendel‘s 4th Reich accusations, they are a positive example of what people can do for peace.
You, and many Brexiters, live in a wartime timewarp constantly bringing up the war or wartime expressions.
As now trying to whitewash a wartime leader. I accept both sides of Churchill as a fact. I would neither deny the good, nor the bad.
Quite frankly, you guys are an embarrassment.
Anyway... a group of Germans from Kiel are coming on an exchange visit to Coventry in September to keep the city partnership alive, continue the work on reconciliation started after the war, create new relationships and friendships between Germans and British and to enjoy the hospitality of both sides of the exchange.
They are a good example of creating opportunities for peace and cooperation.
Compared to your rants and your rage against anything remotely German, and Grendel‘s 4th Reich accusations, they are a positive example of what people can do for peace.
You, and many Brexiters, live in a wartime timewarp constantly bringing up the war or wartime expressions.
As now trying to whitewash a wartime leader. I accept both sides of Churchill as a fact. I would neither deny the good, nor the bad.
Quite frankly, you guys are an embarrassment.
Is that right? You said you only wanted to talk about Churchill being a war criminal because the Nazis said they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal.
Come on Mart. Show us who and when. Calling me names as usual won't stop me pointing out that you are lying.
Is that right? You said you only wanted to talk about Churchill being a war criminal because the Nazis said they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal.
Come on Mart. Show us who and when. Calling me names as usual won't stop me pointing out that you are lying.
So am I with you. You know it was said in jest but poor Mart has been caught out lying yet again so it was time to come to the rescue. Well done.I really am done with how bad you are at comprehension
So Rosenberg could decide things for Hitler?If you really want an online source Alfred Rosenberg wrote a piece called ‘Churchill the War Criminal’ in 1944. An influential Nazi propagandist. There are also many pieces calling him a puppet of the Jews-you think they’d have let him go free?
You said the Nazis stated they were going to take Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal. Where is the statement?They were going to try him ( or maybe shoot him), as a war criminal. There are plenty of books around. Not every page of every book is on google. But, Brighton has given you an example. I don’t know what you are trying to prove or why.
I am not calling you names, just pointing out your constant lies.
I said that originally I answered a question about Churchill and you went on a mad rant and accused me of saying things that I didn’t say. Which makes you a liar.
So am I with you. You know it was said in jest but poor Mart has been caught out lying yet again so it was time to come to the rescue. Well done.
I haven’t been caught out lying. You have. You constantly lie and twist things. When are you going to apologise for the lies you told about what I supposedly said? I told you I read that Hitler said Churchill was a war criminal. I cannot go through all the books that I have ever read on the subject since my school days. It would be easier if you found a quote saying that Hitler would not have tried Churchill, or better still, that Hitler didn’t think Churchill was a war criminal.
The Germans said he was at the time, as Brighton says, and the latest book I know about detailing allied bombing as a war crime, came out just before the reconciliation at the reconsecrating service at the Dresdener Frauenkirche. What are you trying to say? That the Germans, especially the Nazis, didn’t see Churchill as a war criminal and would not have tried him or executed him for war crimes?
So Rosenberg could decide things for Hitler?
This sucking up to Mart is getting past a joke.
So Rosenberg could decide things for Hitler?
This sucking up to Mart is getting past a joke.
You said the Nazis stated that they would have Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal. True or false?I haven’t been caught out lying. You have. You constantly lie and twist things. When are you going to apologise for the lies you told about what I supposedly said? I told you I read that Hitler said Churchill was a war criminal. I cannot go through all the books that I have ever read on the subject since my school days. It would be easier if you found a quote saying that Hitler would not have tried Churchill, or better still, that Hitler didn’t think Churchill was a war criminal.
The Germans said he was at the time, as Brighton says, and the latest book I know about detailing allied bombing as a war crime, came out just before the reconciliation at the reconsecrating service at the Dresdener Frauenkirche. What are you trying to say? That the Germans, especially the Nazis, didn’t see Churchill as a war criminal and would not have tried him or executed him for war crimes?
What did you say liar?Hitler wasn’t the only Nazi to say that Churchill was a war criminal. There is a whole book of Hitler and Churchill quotes. Buy the book if you are interested, but don’t accuse me of lying.
You said the Nazis stated that they would have Churchill to court on the charge of being a war criminal. True or false?
Come on Mart. Easy question.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?