The fucking brass neck on Cameron wanting to get back into front-line politics because he's bored. Best keep your trotters up, mate.
More total paranoia from Mossad Mart !I am well aware of the connectivity between many things happening together. Trump and Brexit are in some sense the same. They stem from the consequences of 2008. Even SISU has a relationship to 2008 in that they got involved with CCFC just before the crash as people were taking risks and winning. The collapse of the banking system and the end of a period of growth showed up flaws in society. This together with the growth of YouTube, FB and co, has allowed the spread of news and views and hate, which has created new problems by allowing, in effect, some bad people an uncontrolled platform. They can make up stories, alter photos and videos with little or no comeback. No right of reply. I check the links on here, and make a point of googling the author and media source. Often as not, there are dubious people or right wing extremists or just right wing think tanks behind the links. More right wing links from the leaver side. I wonder why? If Brexit were really the will of the people you would expect a mix of left and right and relatively neutral people supporting it.
More total paranoia from Mossad Mart !
More total paranoia from Mossad Mart !
Best thing I did was put that rabid crank on ignore
You to. He still rants at me even since I did it.Best thing I did was put that rabid crank on ignore
Oh the irony.If the likes of Banks were involved in anything pro-EU-related, you'd be all over it.
You to. He still rants at me even since I did it.
Oh the irony.
This is what pisses me off with this thread.
They were all at it. They all lied. They all overspent. They all did whatever. But only one version is supposed to be heard. Try and put the other side out and you are biased on something that i don't exactly want.
Why were we ever given the choice if it is such a bad thing?
Oh the irony.
This is what pisses me off with this thread.
They were all at it. They all lied. They all overspent. They all did whatever. But only one version is supposed to be heard. Try and put the other side out and you are biased on something that i don't exactly want.
Why were we ever given the choice if it is such a bad thing?
Have we evidence or is it hearsay? Because most of this thread is hearsay with a bit of evidence thrown in.are you trying to equate overspending with getting a foreign power involved in the referendum?
And it is now emerging that the secret services wanted permission to investigate banks a couple of years ago but were refused by May.
Are you seriously suggesting that that idiot Cameron wrongly spending public money on a leaflet is the equivalent to this?
Do you mean like Lord Sainsbury who gave millions to the remain side and to several parts of it to try and get it in unnoticed?Some made small overspending errors, and others are being investigated for millions of money which came through tax havens and maybe originated in foreign countries. There is a difference. Which foreign countries backed remain? Did their money result in overspend?
One side has been fined and the other is ongoing. I am surprised that you are not interested in the origin of foreign funds and the motives behind the foreign supporters.
Have we evidence or is it hearsay? Because most of this thread is hearsay with a bit of evidence thrown in.
Have I said anyone is guilty or innocent?well it's a bit more than hearsay but true, he hasn't been found guilty of anything yet.
But if anyone thinks Aaron Banks is an honest upstanding citizen I have some magic beans that they might be interested in buying.
Have I said anyone is guilty or innocent?
Those found guilty on the remain side for overspend received money from Sainsbury. It isn't illegal to give the money over. But it was wrong to spend it.
And this was my point on hearsay. Talking about things that are illegal when they are not. But both sides spent too much. And personally I don't think it was illegal. But the wording should be unlawful.
I asked if it is hearsay or if there is evidence. Nobody has answered. It went back onto leave spending too much. Just like remain did.you're equating overspending with involving a foreign power in a UK referendum.
If you think they're on par I'll say no more on the matter, you're entitled to that opinion. I don't think many would agree though.
Especially as getting out of of the EU was supposed to be an end to foreign interference.
It is a sad time for British politics. None of them within touching distance of running the UK are worthy of it. And those who might be worthy of it that are lower down will be disliked by half of the population because they will have alienated half of the population because of Their stance on Brexit. All sides are ripping themselves apart.another think about this Banks story, why is the Daily Mail the first to report it?
It's been behind him and Brexit from the off. Tinfoil hat time but mark my words, on the day that Cameron is supposedly talking about a return to politics and the Blairites have started their anti Corbyn antics again something strange is going on.
another think about this Banks story, why is the Daily Mail the first to report it?
It's been behind him and Brexit from the off. Tinfoil hat time but mark my words, on the day that Cameron is supposedly talking about a return to politics and the Blairites have started their anti Corbyn antics again something strange is going on.
another think about this Banks story, why is the Daily Mail the first to report it?
It's been behind him and Brexit from the off. Tinfoil hat time but mark my words, on the day that Cameron is supposedly talking about a return to politics and the Blairites have started their anti Corbyn antics again something strange is going on.
Are they? I thought this had been talked about for months? All the CA stuff as well. Obviously the referral to the NCA was reported recently but the story as a whole has been developing pretty much since day one post referendum.
Also: Cameron/Blair/TheSlightlyLessGeekyMilliband/Soubry supergroup, you know it’s going to happen.
So just the usual. Twats on Twatter with an agenda with so called evidence not substantiated in any way. Yet it is supposed to be gospal.Some interesting connections made in this thread:
So just the usual. Twats on Twatter with an agenda with so called evidence not substantiated in any way. Yet it is supposed to be gospal.
I suppose you would be happy if I quoted twats on Twatter that are pro Brexit.
On the other hand.......
I can see a pro EU party starting up. They would have representatives from all parties join. And they might get the most votes as people have had enough of the crap from the present parties. And about half the population would like to be in the EU.Are they? I thought this had been talked about for months? All the CA stuff as well. Obviously the referral to the NCA was reported recently but the story as a whole has been developing pretty much since day one post referendum.
Also: Cameron/Blair/TheSlightlyLessGeekyMilliband/Soubry supergroup, you know it’s going to happen.
So what do we KNOW that he has done? What part has he played? What evidence is there?now what are you on about? Banks case has been referred to the NCA in the last couple of days. That is a fact. It doesn't mean he will be found guilty but it is a significant development. It doesn't matter if it's reported on Twitter, the BBC or Sky.
So just the usual. Twats on Twatter with an agenda with so called evidence not substantiated in any way. Yet it is supposed to be gospal.
I suppose you would be happy if I quoted twats on Twatter that are pro Brexit.
On the other hand.......
So what do we KNOW that he has done? What part has he played? What evidence is there?
So just the usual. Twats on Twatter with an agenda with so called evidence not substantiated in any way. Yet it is supposed to be gospal.
I suppose you would be happy if I quoted twats on Twatter that are pro Brexit.
On the other hand.......
So what do we KNOW that he has done? What part has he played? What evidence is there?
I asked if it is hearsay or if there is evidence. Nobody has answered. It went back onto leave spending too much. Just like remain did.
So what is the problem with preferring evidence to hearsay? There is so much bullshit from both sides that it is hard to believe anything without evidence. And that is evidence that can be substantiated.
It's been referred to the NCA, where it goes from here, time will tell, but I repeat, it's a significant development, what are you failing to grasp?
You have to be at the wind up!!
It’s not significant at all - he was not part of the official leave campaign and again the fact remains the government was allowed to send a leaflet to every house which cost every taxpayer (leave or remain) money - unlike anything banks did - and was full of untruths.
The Electoral commission is a blatant Pro EU organisation - this is a pretty cowardly and shameful act deliberately timed. It’s the kind of act you’d expect in Putins Russia not a democratic country.
It’s a significant development alright - but not in the way you believe. This is a serious attempt at derailing democracy
It’s not significant at all - he was not part of the official leave campaign and again the fact remains the government was allowed to send a leaflet to every house which cost every taxpayer (leave or remain) money - unlike anything banks did - and was full of untruths.
The Electoral commission is a blatant Pro EU organisation - this is a pretty cowardly and shameful act deliberately timed. It’s the kind of act you’d expect in Putins Russia not a democratic country.
It’s a significant development alright - but not in the way you believe. This is a serious attempt at derailing democracy
So just the usual. Twats on Twatter with an agenda with so called evidence not substantiated in any way. Yet it is supposed to be gospal.
I suppose you would be happy if I quoted twats on Twatter that are pro Brexit.
On the other hand.......
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?