You think...
Japan and the EU are due to ratify their deal in the new year. It’s already done.
Ah. So the UK hasn't been offered anything now? :wideyed:
You said all the other countries would lower their rights towards what the rights of Vietnam are.
It is there in black and white. And strangely enough I even guessed what you would say just before you did. That is how poor your efforts are.
And as usual you ignore the part that doesn't look good for the EU. I am in shock....
You said the UK had got close to a trade deal. Apparently it was only a comment in a newspaper. Nothing agreed, not to mention ratified. That could take a couple of years. Come back when it is signed and ratified.
And they are all going to lower their standards to that of Romania?
Ask Tony what he thinks.
It's odd someone who was so opposed to neoliberalism and upset at members of society being left behind is now delighted with TTP.
Oh, and he's remain again now, apparently.
There WILL be a deal...it is almost but not quite done - everything we are getting atm is posturing while the dots & crosses are put inI've based my doom and gloom on a no deal scenario which can be modelled because we would then have to follow as set of predefined rules. No one has came back with anything to contradict what I've said. If we do get a deal then you're right, without knowing the terms it's difficult to know what will happen.
Unfortunately no deal is looking increasingly likely.
I was giving you a simple example of counter-position. After that you have applied all your own work as per usual...'nuff said!You seem to have missed it but Japan doesn’t want a bespoke deal with the U.K. they want us to join the ailing TPP. That might not even happen.
We need a bespoke deal with Japan once we leave the EU, on that I think we both agree. Certainly seems to be the gist of what you’re saying. I would say that anything less is an insult to the U.K. and TPP membership is less. If we’re going to leave the EU so we can do something stupid like join the TPP then leave really is a waste of time. If anyone backing leave welcomes the prospect of joining the TPP with open arms then I’d suggest that they’ve lost sight of what leave was supposed to be.
I was giving you a simple example of counter-position. After that you have applied all your own work as per usual...'nuff said!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
There WILL be a deal...it is almost but not quite done - everything we are getting atm is posturing while the dots & crosses are put in
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
And there you go.Ha ha ha. Confirmation that you’ve lost the argument. You’ll be trying to change the subject to Salmayr next.
ErrorWhat? You mean the bit where Carney said Brexit is worse than the Europeans think? That makes the Europeans look bad? I think it makes people who voted Brexit look bad.
So SB.It's odd someone who was so opposed to neoliberalism and upset at members of society being left behind is now delighted with TTP.
Oh, and he's remain again now, apparently.
Error
For those in the EU. Not worse than they think.
They are just like you. They want the UK to suffer. They want us to do badly. They don't want us to get trade deals. They lie about what is going on.
But even worse they break rules and regulations. They pay off a commission that holds enquiries into what they do.
So SB.
I took you as much better than Tony and Mart. They have lied right through this thread.
Would you like to prove the point you have made?
Because it has become more pathetic than before.
And all because I put up more fraudulent misuse of funds and breaking/changing rules and regulations that the EU has done. It shows how they bought off the enquiry.
Or are you a part of the same plan?
Just try explaining how me saying we don't k ow if it is good or bad until we know the details is as you say?
So you admit that those who took part in the enquiry are now going to be paid 3 years after they leave their job. All announced after the enquiry started. Over a quarter of a million each. And now this for their friends and familyAny links to your bullshit?
„They“ did not pay off a commission. At worst Selmayr is alleged to have promised some form of continued privileges for up to 3 years for commissioners after their term of 5 years ends. Including security and cars. Which would make him a popular choice, and certainly seems like a scam.
Now, if you like lies and half truths...
Here they are from the British lying press ( with the truth as an answer ): European Commission in the UK - European Commission
.
Links and factual.answers?Haha... says Mr Twister of Facts, Putting Words into Other People‘s Mouths, Make it up as you go Along... You just ignore links and factual answers.
Links and factual.answers?
Anyone can find the words they want on the net. The content is easy to find. Where the content comes from us important.
Just like you say I am delighted about TPP. Somehow you got that from me saying that we need to know the details before knowing if it is good or bad. The only good thing is knowing other countries want trade deals with us ASAP and not having to wait many years like you have preached to us.
And this putting words into your mouth. That is me showing you to be wrong yet again. If you didn't keep contradicting yourself you wouldn't have said two opposites constantly.
So you admit that those who took part in the enquiry are now going to be paid 3 years after they leave their job. All announced after the enquiry started. Over a quarter of a million each. And now this for their friends and family
European Commission's "Equal Opportunity" Practices Under Fire | EU Training
So how can you even try to say it isn't a pay off for those who were supposed to do a full enquiry on a subject even you had to admit was a scam.
So you admit that those who took part in the enquiry are now going to be paid 3 years after they leave their job. All announced after the enquiry started. Over a quarter of a million each. And now this for their friends and family
European Commission's "Equal Opportunity" Practices Under Fire | EU Training
So how can you even try to say it isn't a pay off for those who were supposed to do a full enquiry on a subject even you had to admit was a scam.
So you admit that those who took part in the enquiry are now going to be paid 3 years after they leave their job. All announced after the enquiry started. Over a quarter of a million each. And now this for their friends and family
European Commission's "Equal Opportunity" Practices Under Fire | EU Training
So how can you even try to say it isn't a pay off for those who were supposed to do a full enquiry on a subject even you had to admit was a scam.
So you admit that those who took part in the enquiry are now going to be paid 3 years after they leave their job. All announced after the enquiry started. Over a quarter of a million each. And now this for their friends and family
European Commission's "Equal Opportunity" Practices Under Fire | EU Training
So how can you even try to say it isn't a pay off for those who were supposed to do a full enquiry on a subject even you had to admit was a scam.
Which is why you are pissed off that we are being offered deals.We already knew that countries want trade deals with the UK asap. Nothing new there. The difference being that trade deals don’t happen over night.
Lies Mart lies.From what I seen, they were getting 3 years transition payments in the past anyway. I read something about them keeping the cars, drivers and security. Maybe that is what is meant as extras?
So those at the top.....Juncker and Selmayr....had nothing to do with it?What is the truth?
„10. Is it true that Commissioners agreed to Mr Selmayr's appointment as Secretary-General only because they had been promised additional "sweeteners", like increased pension allowances or financial benefits after the term of office?
This is not true. The Commission neither had nor has such plans. It does not have the legal competence to change the allowances of Commissioners“
Any links as to what happened in the end?
They already have been. You read the link previously. Now you have suddenly forgotten all about it although you admitted that it was totally wrong.Who took part in the first enquiry?
Do you mean the assessment of the appointment?
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-18-2545_en.pdf
Note the answer on „sweeteners“. The „sweeteners“ were apparently announced during the appointment, but the EC says they were not, and couldn’t be implemented by the EC alone anyway. Do you know if they were ever implemented?
And there you go.
I try my best to have a debate. But you call it an argument.
I do understand though. That is why you and Mart are just lie after lie.
So SB.
I took you as much better than Tony and Mart. They have lied right through this thread.
Would you like to prove the point you have made?
Because it has become more pathetic than before.
And all because I put up more fraudulent misuse of funds and breaking/changing rules and regulations that the EU has done. It shows how they bought off the enquiry.
Or are you a part of the same plan?
Just try explaining how me saying we don't k ow if it is good or bad until we know the details is as you say?
No lies to come out with today?I told you astute would be on selmayr next.
At least they are making plans for all eventualities. Unlike the EU.The lengths universities are willing to go to post brexit to maintain funding University 'dual nationality' plan for Brexit
I can't stand liars and lies.Bloody hell are you lot still giving yourself a heart attack about something that will never happen
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?