Merkel doesn’t need advice from a light weight like May.
Yes...I'm not absolutely convinced that May is the best person to seek advice from but Merkel will do anything to retain power...just like any politician
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Desperate?Within the CU or SM? And May was going through all this with Merkel as you posted that we are not allowed to talk about it. Any desperate attempt to show the EU in a bad light.
You call it disastrous. It isn't unless Juncker continues to play the c unt. And even then we will have to wait and see.You do not see any difference between the disastrous government and Brexit referendum and the U.K.? You can love the UK and hate the position it is in because of bad government.
And the EU is all about positivity?You don’t need a toothcomb to find a negative with Brexit. Maybe a magnifying glass to find a positive.
And Switzerland are just as fault as us I supposeHe isn’t doing anything. We are.
A few paltry billions. Don't you mean many billions every year?We have 9 Crown Dependencies and the London City. I would not be mentioning a few paltry billion if I were you. Glass houses and all that..
Oh yes Merkel is so strong :smuggrin:Merkel doesn’t need advice from a light weight like May.
A few paltry billions. Don't you mean many billions every year?
Is that us from the UK or foreign banks?The city of London is widely regarded as one of the most corrupt places in the world with regards to money laundering.
The National Crime Agency estimated at least 90Bn a year.
Juncker blocked the EU from looking into what he did. Then he got a top job in the EU. But that means nothing to some.Yeah we can’t talk to anyone about dodgy money and corruption. We’re one of the worst and usually we’re the blocker to stronger EU regulation of finance.
Is that us from the UK or foreign banks?
Juncker is innocent
And so they should be.A lot of it is drug trafficking money that gets cleaned. Our very own HSBC got fined around 2bn for laundering drug cartel money.
The city of London is widely regarded as one of the most corrupt places in the world with regards to money laundering.
The National Crime Agency estimated at least 90Bn a year.
So it is OK for Juncker to be in his position in the EU because banks have done something wrong?And that’s before you factor in British overseas territories. You haven’t even got to cross the Atlantic, the Isle of Man and Channel Isles are on our doorstep.
So it is OK for Juncker to be in his position in the EU because banks have done something wrong?
That is like saying May is doing a good job because she is better than Corbyn.
Desperate?
Are you saying that it isn't the truth?
You call it disastrous. It isn't unless Juncker continues to play the c unt. And even then we will have to wait and see.
So it is OK for Juncker to be in his position in the EU because banks have done something wrong?
That is like saying May is doing a good job because she is better than Corbyn.
And the EU is all about positivity?
Oh yes Merkel is so strong :smuggrin:
Is that us from the UK or foreign banks?
Juncker is innocent
Juncker blocked the EU from looking into what he did. Then he got a top job in the EU. But that means nothing to some.
Never mind getting Junker to agree on brexit we still can’t agree with ourselves 'Worst of both worlds': Boris Johnson and David Cameron savage Theresa May's Brexit plan
Doesn’t bode well for the crunch talks at chequers. I’ve been taking all the talk of another general election in autumn with a pinch of salt but if the government can’t agree on brexit what choice will there be?
It means 26 out of 28 governments approved him.
Transit camps...it was pretty easy to understandIt would be easier if you said which „them“ you were talking about.
The brexiteers are meeting with BoJo now ( or maybe it’s home time ). They are threatening to resign or cause enough trouble Friday ( today ) to perhaps bring down the government. We shall see how much they are aware of the consequences of a no deal Brexit.
Which is why I asked. Part of the government is oblivious as to the consequences.
Ureka! So Britain is most definitely NOT 3yrs behind due to Brexit. We have agreed something !Britain was the original problem and therefore the most difficult to get back into China.
Had she listened to some of our other lightweights over the yrs the EU might not be careering into an increasingly fragile scenarioMerkel doesn’t need advice from a light weight like May.
Yes...exactly why the EU leaders want financial institutions to move too. They want a slice of that for themselves!The city of London is widely regarded as one of the most corrupt places in the world with regards to money laundering.
The National Crime Agency estimated at least 90Bn a year.
Well let us wait & see how soon & what 'stronger EU regulation of finance' looks like. If it is anything like their border policy that few have given much attention to un the past...it will probably just be hot airYeah we can’t talk to anyone about dodgy money and corruption. We’re one of the worst and usually we’re the blocker to stronger EU regulation of finance.
Ah...there is a pattern forming with you that Mart always demonstrates tooNever mind getting Junker to agree on brexit we still can’t agree with ourselves 'Worst of both worlds': Boris Johnson and David Cameron savage Theresa May's Brexit plan
Doesn’t bode well for the crunch talks at chequers. I’ve been taking all the talk of another general election in autumn with a pinch of salt but if the government can’t agree on brexit what choice will there be?
Ureka! So Britain is most definitely NOT 3yrs behind due to Brexit. We have agreed something !
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Ah...there is a pattern forming with you that Mart always demonstrates too
UK: differing opinions = argument, stupid, clueless, lacking clear direction & we are doomed
EU countries/German coalition members: differing opinions = healthy debate & they will find a positive solution
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?