You ever answered a question on topic or without another question?
I always answer questions - avoidance and denial is your style not mine - these are hardly earth shattering questions and are hardly things that the government will not be considering.
Equally other similar federations across Europe are concerned for members jobs of Britain are hit with punitive tariffs when Brexit happens have they not?
Still in denial? Poor loveI am not playing with numbers. The nation is not behind Brexit. It wasn’t on the day leave won and it definitely isn’t now.
Leave won a vote, but they didn’t have the nation behind them. It was a narrow win, not an overwhelming victory.
Still in denial? Poor love
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Self interest obviously. The same as you & many others. You think everyone that voted leave did so for spite or race or some other foibles to do with being 'led up the garden path'. MORE denial - most probably had a specific self interest &/or wisdom that you & I didn't, & they voted accordingly.Oh, I see. Then you will be pleased to see our farmers asking for the dropping all EU farming regulations. NFU advised it’s members to vote remain. I wonder why.
No. Some of them thought we would vote remain so didn’t bother voting.
You have intimated EXACTLY that - MANY MANY TIMES!I didn’t say that. You made it up. As usual.
But you are in favour of protectionism. That is one of your main readons for remaining isn't it? Protected free-trade with the EU?No, I am saying they advise remain .. presumably to keep up this protectionism and there is no way they are not lobbying to keep it that way. So no change there if we leave.
So your last two posts have actually been questions in answer to questions!Your English is sometimes hard to understand. First paragraph ok. Second not so easy to understand.
Everyone is concerned about job losses through Brexit. Very understandable.
Who stands to benefit economically?
What have I denied? We are up shit creek without a paddle? PERSONAL OPINION
May was weakened not strengthened when she asked voters to back „Brexit means Brexit“? PERSONAL OPINION
That the referendum was lost 52:48? I have merely confirmed that you are talking bollocks claiming that the Nation wants Brexit.PERSONAL OPINION
Half the nation at least doesn’t want it.PERSONAL OPINION
Even on the day around half of voters voted against Brexit. The nation is split and, in effect, rudderless.PERSONAL OPINION
What have I denied? We are up shit creek without a paddle? May was weakened not strengthened when she asked voters to back „Brexit means Brexit“? That the referendum was lost 52:48? I have merely confirmed that you are talking bollocks claiming that the Nation wants Brexit. Half the nation at least doesn’t want it. Even on the day around half of voters voted against Brexit. The nation is split and, in effect, rudderless.
Every time I come back on here I see the same stuff from you. It seems you're on here on this topic, from first thing in the morning to last thing at night 24/7 I assume business in the pub is slack.
Most of your views are the polar opposite to mine but that's what a forum is all about so no problem there. I do get the clear impression though, unlike most of the other remainers, that you really do want Brexit to go badly for the UK. I find that particularly nauseating.
I do agree with you that the nation is split however. My own take is that the anti--EU feeling expressed in the referendum is if anything stronger now than it was two years ago but there's no denying there's still a huge split.
So, given where we are, what would you like to happen? Do you want the result reversed? a second referendum? a vote on the deal?
It's easy to stand on the sidelines and criticise; I'm genuinely interested in what your overall best case outcome would be.
Different day...same old bollocks!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
So your last two posts have actually been questions in answer to questions!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
But you are in favour of protectionism. That is one of your main readons for remaining isn't it? Protected free-trade with the EU?
I don't know how you manage to type given the bloody knots you tie yourself up in!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Well I guess anyone can glibly say that many that wanted to leave didn't bother to vote because the pollsters had pissed on their chips in the lead up. They thought it was pointless.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
But you are in favour of protectionism. That is one of your main readons for remaining isn't it? Protected free-trade with the EU?
I don't know how you manage to type given the bloody knots you tie yourself up in!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Self interest obviously. The same as you & many others. You think everyone that voted leave did so for spite or race or some other foibles to do with being 'led up the garden path'. MORE denial - most probably had a specific self interest &/or wisdom that you & I didn't, & they voted accordingly.
Now you must be familiar with that notion. EU country like Britain has a negative issue with immigration. Nothing happens other than hot air, vague agreements & inaction. Germany has a negative issue with immigration...& then the issue becomes a point of major discussion & need for policy enforcement or change for the EU as a whole. You know...self interest?!
But you will not accept that because you are in denial that Germany, abetted mostly by France, force the EU agenda.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I think that 17,4 million people had a host of different reasons. Many for the reasons you quoted. Problem is, that if several hundred thousand had voted differently we would have had maybe a slight majority the other way. Did the lies and the leading up the garden path bring a different result? We will never know, but the referendum was flawed by the goings on behind the scenes. I hope we learn more of what went on.
The U.K. was a major player in the EU. That’s how it got it’s exceptions to e.g. the Euro. Now you complain that Germany and France are steering the ship. Whose fault is that? We are jumping ship and giving up our influence in Europe.
That is YOUR problem. Hence I continue to say it!Different day and you still can’t make a valid point.
But the EU simply sets rules to outlaw other imports. That is discriminatory & protectionist. Reciprocal enters into that in NO WAY whatsoever. It means the exporters lose trade, become poorer & citizens feel their only chance is to become a migrant to the EU/USA or similarProtectionism in the form of agreed and reciprocal trading. Not just doing a Trump. The EU has deals or arrangements witha large part of the world. The rest of the world has it’s own borders and protectionism. You have to negotiate to get as much free trade as possible. But there are quality, safety and ethical standards which you call protectionist, which we should always impose.
But you are permitting yourself to say that they were passionately behinf remaining & that the nation should stay in the EU. Polar was a word used to describe you earlier by Sir Ernie. Personally I struggle to find words which might be classed as inoffensive to describe you!Exactly, but you cannot say that the non voters were passionately behind Brexit and claim the nation is behind Brexit.
Protectionism in the form of agreed and reciprocal trading. Not just doing a Trump. The EU has deals or arrangements witha large part of the world. The rest of the world has it’s own borders and protectionism. You have to negotiate to get as much free trade as possible. But there are quality, safety and ethical standards which you call protectionist, which we should always impose.
What planet do you live on? We ARE beholden to other countries for our food (largely thanks to reliance on EU colleagues).No one is going to open up the farmers to absolutely free trade competition with the whole world. If they are undercut and go out of business then we are beholden to other countries for our food. One thing if we lost manufacturing, another if we lost our food production. Even if it makes economic sense, it doesn’t make strategic sense.
Nah - I think the opposite. Many EU countries citizens are now feeling empowered. 'If the UK can do without the EU...so can we' attitude is growing...but reticent as they are watching to see how things pan out.I think that 17,4 million people had a host of different reasons. Many for the reasons you quoted. Problem is, that if several hundred thousand had voted differently we would have had maybe a slight majority the other way. Did the lies and the leading up the garden path bring a different result? We will never know, but the referendum was flawed by the goings on behind the scenes. I hope we learn more of what went on.
The U.K. was a major player in the EU. That’s how it got it’s exceptions to e.g. the Euro. Now you complain that Germany and France are steering the ship. Whose fault is that? We are jumping ship and giving up our influence in Europe.
Nah - I think the opposite. Many EU countries citizens are now feeling empowered. 'If the UK can do without the EU...so can we' attitude is growing...but reticent as they are watching to see how things pan out.
EU leaders are not blind or deaf...they sense it. So intend being tough on us leaving.
It will end in tears all round for sure - but it will probably & sadly now end imo. The divisions are growing too rapidly for the EU to keep pace with. Which is ironic because had the EU stopped to catch breath more often...it could've worked very well indeed.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
What planet do you live on? We ARE beholden to other countries for our food (largely thanks to reliance on EU colleagues).
If shit hit fan, the only people sustainable for any protracted period would be the gentry, the armed services & the frigging farmers!!!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Please don’t say you are denying the Eu has protectionist strategies that are purely focused on price
If you are you really are beyond mental
But you are permitting yourself to say that they were passionately behinf remaining & that the nation should stay in the EU. Polar was a word used to describe you earlier by Sir Ernie. Personally I struggle to find words which might be classed as inoffensive to describe you!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
But the EU simply sets rules to outlaw other imports. That is discriminatory & protectionist. Reciprocal enters into that in NO WAY whatsoever. It means the exporters lose trade, become poorer & citizens feel their only chance is to become a migrant to the EU/USA or similar
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
That is YOUR problem. Hence I continue to say it!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I do keep asking this.
There were major lies in the remain campaign including a fact from the government that 3 million would be unemployed immediately after the result and an emergency austerity budget would be implemented the minute a leave result was announced.
Do you think this had any influence on voting intentions?
Gasp! Polls wrong??? Well, I have never heard the like!That’s the opposite of what polls say and what people say where I travel here. They cannot understand us and certainly don’t want to end up in our position.
Wasn't it Boris who said that though?They weren’t lies. They were predictions. Saying or implying that there would be 350 m a week for the NHS was a deliberate lie.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?