You will have to wait a long time then.
I didn't mention Brexit. I was agreeing with Westendlad about enjoying watching the corrupt EU crumble over the next few years.
I openly admit that I will never come clise to being as big a cock as you areSpoken as a true kipper.
Be sure about what?
Gove is one man...not the collective of Governemnet - his rant means absolutely diddliey squat!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I openly admit that I will never come clise to being as big a cock as you are
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
That is because what you spout is utterly biased &/or negative about the decision we have taken to leave the UK
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
So what? Many experts have opined that no-deal is better than a bad deal.EU says there is no hope of securing UK's Brexit withdrawal deal by October
Coming on a bundle isn’t it.
You are a dick
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
And you the emblem of denialYou really are the emblem of the post-truth society.
You aren't disputing the result??????????Jesus.. this just gets more crazy..no one is disputing the result. It always was an advisory referendum. No it wasn’t the result we wanted and we may be leaving, but it certainly isn’t the will of the people.
So what? Many experts have opined that no-deal is better than a bad deal.
Ypu ignore the Beef deal with China & the BAE deal with Australia because it just doesn't fit ypur agenda does it??? They cpuld be just the start...AND could be the very reason the Brexit deal with the EU is not moving at the pace ypu wpuld prefer...we are out there getting the business in instead of talking bollocks with ypur EU cronies
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
You aren't disputing the result??????????
Then do us all a favour & shut the fuck up!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Different day...same bollocksNo idiot.
It won’t happen if they say go to WTO standards because we cannot agree. A transition period in the sense that the UK wants, is remaining on current terms, but without voting rights. There is no guarantee of that. Going on to WTO standards until deals are arranged is what I think you mean, but that is not what is meant as a transition period.
And yet 3 posts previous...you acknowledged that you are one!Strange conclusion.
No I mean the one specific to Britain...China lifts ban on British beefYou mean this one: EU beef expected to return to Chinese market
You don't know that, nobody knows for sure. Yes it could go tits up for the UK but the majority wanted a change and people like you are doing their best to put spanners in the works. Back it don't fight it.I think the decision is wrong and will end up hurting the UK. Simple really. It’s called having an opinion.
Germany and France blocked it. How come they miss your list?I thought I had. I told you Merkel and the EU were debating the migration problem. It is difficult to resolve. The U.K. blocked Italy‘s requests. The U.K. sits on a large island with, in effect, a moat. Italy and it’s islands are within reach of Africa and Italy has a larger burden because of this. Trying to get countries who are well out of the way to help was always going to be difficult. Let’s see what happens. How‘s the cabinet getting on btw? Plans agreed?
You hope!You will have to wait a long time then.
So yeah the EU is for the benefit of the people. As long as you are French or German that is.
Yes they are. But rules get bent or rewritten for the benefit of Germany and France. And the austerity measures affect the rest of the EU even more. Germany mainly suffers with banks making less money and people's savings not earning much. The poorer nations suffer through job losses. But it is one of only a few ways to help the poorer countries of the EU who are tied to the Euro to get out of the hole they are in.Many French and German people are suffering too from ECB imposed austerity measures which are also helping drive extremist opinion in those countries.
Different day...same bollocks
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Yes they are. But rules get bent or rewritten for the benefit of Germany and France. And the austerity measures affect the rest of the EU even more. Germany mainly suffers with banks making less money and people's savings not earning much. The poorer nations suffer through job losses. But it is one of only a few ways to help the poorer countries of the EU who are tied to the Euro to get out of the hole they are in.
Germany and France blocked it. How come they miss your list?
So migrants landing is down by over 90%. So what is the problem? Anything to do with not being able to give them an EU passport and send them to the UK?
Ok now to be serious. It is all happening to save Merkels job. Those who she jumped into bed with won't back her anymore if any more migrants arrive. Isn't it amazing that Cameron couldn't even get a meeting but Merkel can get the whole rulebook thrown out. They are even going against human rights if they manage to keep to their plans.
So yeah the EU is for the benefit of the people. As long as you are French or German that is.
Many French and German people are suffering too from ECB imposed austerity measures which are also helping drive extremist opinion in those countries.
And you the emblem of denial
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
It sounds like you are hoping everything goes tits up for the UK so you can say you told us so. But as usual it is just all hearsay.
So back to the problems that the EU has that you make out it doesn't have.....
Not in a democracy it doesn't. The referendum was designed to follow the majority vote (ie - the majority of the peole that cared enough to vote.
Your argument about majority is exactly why the EU has become such a German dominated beast. Look at the latest agreement (?) on immigration.I have read several articles already decrying it as anything from carfeully worded to change nothing in reality (but protect Merkel's coalition) riggt up to pure bullshit in real terms.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I gave you links from what is normally a pro EU paper. It has never been on the banned list from pro EU posters on here. They say Germany and they give the reasons. Yet you try to make out that I have made it up.Yes it’s all about Germany... it’s getting worse with you. You‘re off Juncker for a change and on to Merkel. Another old favourite. No one is giving out passports to send „them“ to the UK. That’s a Faragism.
Whether or not figures are up or down, a European solution to migration is necessary. And yes of course the human rights are likely to go under if populists are exerting pressure. I thought you were in favour of that?
There is going to be migration from Africa and refugees from war zones now and in the future. Nothing to do with Germany, Merkel or Juncker. Africa has a young population and the ME remains unstable.
The question is how to control it humanely and get all countries to share the burden. Compromises will have to be made. Which you will criticise.
Your conclusion is of course nonsense and a Faragism. As regards Cameron, he was asking to bend the 4 freedoms by restricting FOM. That has not changed and is nothing to do with the refugee crisis. The rule book ( FOM ) hasn’t been thrown away and you are making things up again.
So arresting people without evidence when they have evidence that they are not even the person they are accused of being is an accident?The story is of incompetence and a well meaning attempt to stop people smuggling in flimsy boats after over 300 refugees died in a shipwreck.
Apparently they are using the wrong tactics and people are being mistakenly imprisoned. Large amounts of money are being wasted chasing the wrong people. That is not the same as deliberately abusing human rights.
It doesn’t help the victims to know that, but it is unfair to use it as an example of EU human rights abuse.
So arresting people without evidence when they have evidence that they are not even the person they are accused of being is an accident?
You certainly are making this up. It is the EU that doesn't seem to care about business.Making things up again... I ever said there were no problems... I said they were discussing them. They weren’t ripping up reports or saying „fuck business“. That is the UK way of dealing with problems.
I gave you links from what is normally a pro EU paper. It has never been on the banned list from pro EU posters on here. They say Germany and they give the reasons. Yet you try to make out that I have made it up.
So how about the this?
ECB signals more austerity amid mounting economic divisions in Europe
Well the EU is about to lock up migrants to help Merkel. Yet they never do anything to help Germany you say.....52% of the people who cared to vote is not the will of the people.
Having discussions and coming to a conclusion in a short period of time - which will no doubt be changed a few times in the future- that will ease the immediate problem is better than spending 2 years and having nothing on the table. It doesn’t show that the EU is a German dominated beast at all. If it were, 27 would have signed up without discussion and done everything Merkel wanted. If anything, it proves countries have the power to veto things in order to get their views considered.
The EU has been allowing it. They know all about it. So do several countries in the EU. Read it again.Don’t know, but it isn’t EU policy. It seems to be incompetence or people acting on their own iniative.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?