Exactly the same way it does now.
So what would be so difficult on not changing the way trade works presently?
One day he claims that he wanted to get out the EU then all of a sudden pretends that he wanted to remain the whole time and now he has gone back to wanting to leave.
But is the 7,400 That want DN in the EU massive when multiples want to stay in the UK?
Lawson would get a pension anyway so it’s not anything to do with Brexit Britain
Are we still half a million a year for Rumpy Pumpy to do nothing? Good job he is not Italian his successor will be telling him to work harder - or perhaps not.
No, but living in the vile enemy EU territory in a chateau is to say the least, hypocritical.
We voted to leave the EU.
So that means we need to make agreements between each other. The best agreements would benefit both sides.
One of the agreements has to be about trade. So why can't we have a free trade agreement like now.
Try coming out with a logical reason. Because I can't think of a single one. The EU countries would even be better off with one. It isn't as though we have a massive surplus in trade with the EU. It is the EU that has a massive surplus with us.
Trade is only one issue with the border. You have to work out what to do with people for starters.So how do we solve Ireland if we don't know the trade agreement?
But any trade deal is massive when sorting out with Ireland. How can anything be sorted when we don't know how much needs to be sorted?Trade is only one issue with the border. You have to work out what to do with people for starters.
If we're not part of free movement then surely it needs a hard border?
If you don't have that what stops it being a free for all, any EU citizen comes to Ireland and then just walks over the border and they are in the UK.
That's nothing like the 'control of our borders' that leave were pushing in their campaign.
If we get on to trade even if we have a free trade agreement with Europe what about other countries? Unless every agreement we have is identical to the EU, and therefore the same as Ireland, there needs to be a border.
These aren't little things that will be sorted easily. Really this should have been thought through in advance and a solution proposed so that those who voted leave knew what they were voting for.
But any trade deal is massive when sorting out with Ireland. How can anything be sorted when we don't know how much needs to be sorted?
The last thing that anyone should want is a hard border in Ireland. That doesn't mean that we should stay in the EU just because of the problems with Ireland. If everyone worked together it would be much easier. But so far the EU hasn't done much except for have a go at anyone who wants to sort things out.
The EU doesn’t want a hard border, but if go to WTO rules without a deal, then it is compulsory to have a border. We have created this situation.
The Eu would love a hard border they are evil spiteful people - we have created nothing. We had the audacity to listen to the will of the people - something the bigoted corrupt filth in Brussels can’t stand. The same goes for you - you admit you couldn’t care less about any if the countries suffering under the Eu authoritarianism as long as your life is fine and dandy.
The Eu would love a hard border they are evil spiteful people - we have created nothing. We had the audacity to listen to the will of the people - something the bigoted corrupt filth in Brussels can’t stand. The same goes for you - you admit you couldn’t care less about any if the countries suffering under the Eu authoritarianism as long as your life is fine and dandy.
Is Rumpy Pumpy still getting half a million a year?
If they wanted what was best for the citizens of the EU there wouldn't be a problem. But they are causing problems to try and get us to stay.The UK created Brexit and the chaos and uncertainty that comes with it. You may have noticed that there was an advisory referendum on the subject... in the UK and no where else. It is our baby, but 2 Years later no one can explain how it is going to work.
Just soundbites from people like you. Meaningless sayings and assorted drivel, but no answers to the questions posed by Brexit.
Just blame Tusk or Juncker or Barnier... but never ever the 17,4 million who voted for Brexit or the scum that lead the campaign.
The UK might still if the EU do soBusiness as usual? In what way? Freedom of Movement? Then surely you believe the UK should say the same then as far as EU citizens go?
Read back & you will find you're quite wrong.The EU didn’t vote for us to leave we did. It’s our show. It doesn’t work both ways. We decided to leave it’s for us tho decide what that means it’s then for the EU to decide if that’s acceptable to them. Anything else and it’s no deal because we don’t know what we’ve voted for. You’ve voted to take back control and now you’re asking the EU to decide what that means. Can you really not see the contradiction in what you’re saying.
You can sod off...I will answer for myselfI’ll answer that for him.
No, he cannot.
I cannot understand your keep banging on about anyone else regurgitating the same old arguments. You're still stuck in 2000 when things appeared to be going well, but really TB was capitulating on many issuesI don’t know... has the UK rushed in to help by accepting thousands of asylum seekers?
You can sod off...I will answer for myself
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I cannot understand your keep banging on about anyone else regurgitating the same old arguments. You're still stuck in 2000 when things appeared to be going well, but really TB was capitulating on many issues
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
If they wanted what was best for the citizens of the EU there wouldn't be a problem. But they are causing problems to try and get us to stay.
But you know this.
Wasn't 52% of voters it was 52% of those who voted. Its a subtle but important difference as only 37% of registered voters put an x in the leave box.will of the 52% voters
Wasn't 52% of voters it was 52% of those who voted. Its a subtle but important difference as only 37% of registered voters put an x in the leave box.
That equates to 34% of voting age population or 27% of total population.
If Cameron hadn't been so sure he was going to win a bit more thought would have been put in to the mechanics of the vote.
Wasn't 52% of voters it was 52% of those who voted. Its a subtle but important difference as only 37% of registered voters put an x in the leave box.
That equates to 34% of voting age population or 27% of total population.
If Cameron hadn't been so sure he was going to win a bit more thought would have been put in to the mechanics of the vote.
That’s totally irrelevant
No it isn’t. You just say things without foundation. Brexit is not the will of the people. They won an advisory referendum and around 50 % of the actual voters did not vote for Brexit, which is a majority if you include all registered voters. It was a slim majority of voters. Ok. You can say it was a majority vote, but it is nowhere near an expression of the will of the people. The government has no right to ignore the will of the people who didn’t vote for Brexit. At best they should go for a compromise such as a BRINO deal.
The have no mandate to disenfranchise half of the electorate. Any deal has to be acceptable to the majority of the people. No one knows what the deal on the table will be. There has to be another vote on this calamity.
The UK might still if the EU do so
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
It’s irrelevant. The question was stay or remain in the EU - those who abstained from voting by definition were not interested in the outcome.
Another vote to make the right choice is the way of a banana republic
One party stood for that at the election - remind me how well they did.
Been a few posts on here where you've implied people shouldn't have a say in things but calling the result of a vote totally irrelevant is a bit much!That’s totally irrelevant
Been a few posts on here where you've implied people shouldn't have a say in things but calling the result of a vote totally irrelevant is a bit much!
That would only be true if leavers weren't constantly going on about the will of the people.Including non voters is irrelevant
What % put the X in the remain box?Wasn't 52% of voters it was 52% of those who voted. Its a subtle but important difference as only 37% of registered voters put an x in the leave box.
That equates to 34% of voting age population or 27% of total population.
If Cameron hadn't been so sure he was going to win a bit more thought would have been put in to the mechanics of the vote.
Including non voters is irrelevant
27%? You are starting to sound like Mart.That would only be true if leavers weren't constantly going on about the will of the people.
You're drawing a conclusion about those who didn't vote to suit you preference when in reality you can have no idea what a higher turnout would have meant to the end result. You can't claim something is the will of the people when only 27% of the population voted for it!
What % put the X in the remain box?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?