Sick Boy
Super Moderator
...and you don't I suppose? I have seen you regularly describe your posts as 'the truth'.
There is zero evidence on a lot of what tou come out with. But you make it out to be a fact.
It has always been the same.
The UK gives. The EU takes.
Correct. We should be much further along by now.
I would say why but you and others would soon jump in and defend the EU.
Someone says we voted to go into the EU. I say we didn't.Why is it fine for you to accuse people of 'twisting the truth', yet you just did that yourself?
We didn't vote to join the EU. That is the truth....and you don't I suppose? I have seen you regularly describe your posts as 'the truth'.
Do we give money to the EU and the EU takes it?Well that is another „Trumpism“. Don’t you remember Maggie Thatcher and our rebate? Why are we not in the Euro? Why are we not in Schengen?
So you have just agreed with me while using it to try and make a point against me?Would it be because we have a strong pm and a unified cabinet who have put clear and concise demands on the table? No? Oh what a surprise...
Someone says we voted to go into the EU. I say we didn't.
We didn't have a vote to join the EU. Yet you say I'm twisting the truth.
So you have just agreed with me while using it to try and make a point against me?
You two are getting desperate. How about admitting that we didn't vote to join the EU?
Do we give money to the EU and the EU takes it?
Someone says we voted to go into the EU. I say we didn't.
We didn't have a vote to join the EU. Yet you say I'm twisting the truth.
You’re twisting the truth- again.
We didn't vote to join the EU. That is the truth.
Was it the truth when it was said we voted to join the EU?
This could be fun.
Come on, he has no hidden agenda..he is neutral.
I was alive then also. We didn't vote to join. So yet another true fact statement is false.Our elected and sovereign parliament did. The Queen signed the necessary acts of parliament. Where were you?
Again it sounds like you’re saying that we shouldn’t have had a referendum to leave as we’d already had one to join and we’re not allowed to change our mind. It’s undemocratic. Apparently.
No hidden agenda.He should referee our games. CCFC would win the league..
Why will any new country joining be a part of both?Well that is another „Trumpism“. Don’t you remember Maggie Thatcher and our rebate? Why are we not in the Euro? Why are we not in Schengen?
So I ask you again. When did we vote to join the EU?
Why can't you answer a question that asks you to verify what you have said? You said we voted to join. We never did. So you make a comment and get backed up when you all know that it is a false statement.
Nice one.
It has always been the same.
The UK gives. The EU takes.
I can't stand lies or twisting of the truth.
I was alive then also. We didn't vote to join. So yet another true fact statement is false.
Just point out where I said that. This is becoming a joke.You clearly stated that 17 months isn’t a long enough period for people to be allowed to change their minds so I was just wondering what was. Personally I don’t mind if people changed their minds the following day whether they voted leave or remain or voted to join or not join all those years ago. Changing our minds make us human, it’s called free will. I don’t have a problem with that whether that be 1 day, 17 months or half a century later. You clearly do as you want to put a timescale of allowance on it. I was just wondering what that timescale was.
And what was the point of this post?You do realise that we are the EU? At least for now anyway. It’s us, not us and them.
Point it out then. Or is it just another lie.Hahaha you did it yourself earlier.
Point it out then. Or is it just another lie.
Just point out where I said that. This is becoming a joke.
And what was the point of this post?
We are in the EU. We are not the EU.
When you look across all the opinion polls over the last 6 months very little has changed. There is certainly no massive anti Brexit swing - in fact consistently 30% of all polled remain uninterested which means given the relative split of those interested only 30% of voters want a second vote.
The notion we can just have a poll a week of minds change (even though as I've pointed out there is no evidence of that) is getting beyond the realm of credibility.
However, as I've frequently pointed out, there is s process and that's vote through the ballot box for a party that wants one. The Tories won a majority on that election pledge and in the prior election the UKIP vote soared due to the pledge. So if the feeling is that great the Lib Dems WILL be the next party of government or at least form a sizeable coalition partner.
It's no good though saying there are other issues when we are being told by the pro Euro group this is the big issue. Clearly if the above scenario doesn't unfold and the polls are correct - it just isn't.
Still no further ahead, never going to happen.
And how unfair is that? If we voted to remain would we of leaved?
I dont see any harm in wanting the people to confirm they're happy with any deal made...
If leaving good for us, they will be after all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?