Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (18 Viewers)

  • Thread starter jimmyhillsfanclub
  • Start date Jun 8, 2016
Forums New posts

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed Jun 15, 2016.
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1412
  • 1413
  • 1414
  • 1415
  • 1416
  • …
  • 1484
Next
First Prev 1414 of 1484 Next Last

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,456
Skybluefaz said:
If Labour abstained it would still look like they aren't accepting of the referendum and they'd be hit with that stick again. This I believe is an attempt to win those red wall voters back.
Click to expand...
Thought it was Corbyn they all hated or has that story changed again?
 
Reactions: Brylowes and Ian1779

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,457
Skybluefaz said:
If Labour abstained it would still look like they aren't accepting of the referendum and they'd be hit with that stick again. This I believe is an attempt to win those red wall voters back.
Click to expand...
Not sure it will work like that. If Brexit is a success the Conservatives will claim the credit. If its a disaster anytime Starmer brings up anything about it being a bad deal it will just be batted away with 'you voted for it'.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,458
Skybluefaz said:
If Labour abstained it would still look like they aren't accepting of the referendum and they'd be hit with that stick again. This I believe is an attempt to win those red wall voters back.
Click to expand...
Just come out apologise for trying to do it in the first place. Starmer should have done this Day 1, as should have Corbyn before him.
 

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,459
Grendel said:
Didn't they abstain from the Tier strategy?
Click to expand...
What has that got to do with Brexit?
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,460
Astute said:
All he has done is what most modern day politicians do. Go against the opposition even if it isn't the best thing to do.

He had his chance as leader of Labour to try and shape what happened with Brexit. But he just sat on the fence for as long as he could. It gave the Tories an easy time. But it wasn't a surprise as he often stated he wanted out of the EU before the referendum.
Click to expand...

Jo Swinson and Corbyn bottled their opportunity to have a second referendum. They couldn’t work together electorally and that cost both parties seats. So it seems pretty pointless that Corbyn is grandstanding by opposing the deal, when the alternative is no deal and a harder Brexit.

Brexit is happening, and we’ve got to hope that it goes well and we become more outward looking as a nation.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,461
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Jo Swinson and Corbyn bottled their opportunity to have a second referendum. They couldn’t work together electorally and that cost both parties seats. So it seems pretty pointless that Corbyn is grandstanding by opposing the deal, when the alternative is no deal and a harder Brexit.

Brexit is happening, and we’ve got to hope that it goes well and we become more outward looking as a nation.
Click to expand...
A plan to have one should have never got off the ground. Leave would have won by an even bigger margin second time round.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,462
Mucca Mad Boys said:
So it seems pretty pointless that Corbyn is grandstanding by opposing the deal, when the alternative is no deal and a harder Brexit.
Click to expand...
Is he grandstanding? He was one of 52 MPs who abstained, he wasn't even one of the 73 MPs who voted against it.

Not sure why anyone is really concerned about how he votes, he's no longer leader, in fact he's not even a Labour MP. How he votes is pretty much insignificant in a parliament where the government has a huge majority.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,463
Skybluefaz said:
What has that got to do with Brexit?
Click to expand...

He argued abstaining was not an avoidance of the issue but a positive action. His reasoning on Brexit is it’s not positive and avoiding the issue.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,464
fernandopartridge said:
He abstained. The reality is less would you want no deal or this deal, more would you rather be seen to support the abysmal deal put forward by the Tories.

I find it quite bizarre that forensic genius Starmer whipped the party to vote for it when a) the tories have a huge majority, and b) the actual draft legislation only appeared a day or two ago. His first critique (if he can manage a bit of opposition) will just be beaten down with a "well you voted for the deal" and they'd be spot on.
Click to expand...

I get that on a level, but the alternative is no deal at all.

To be frank, the deal isn’t all that bad. Zero tariff and zero quota access to the EU Single Market without having to pay into it, is not that bad an outcome. It’s still a ‘hard’ Brexit, but you don’t want to like Norway where you pay to be in the club, but with no representation or say in decision making.

Even countries within the single market, you have to do customs declarations. A soft Brexit is, in a way, the worst of both worlds; you don’t get benefits of being in the EU whilst also not benefitting from the potential pros of Brexit.

In the short term, it’ll be a big shock to the country and economically, not as beneficial as EU membership. Longer term, there is some potential.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,465
chiefdave said:
Is he grandstanding? He was one of 52 MPs who abstained, he wasn't even one of the 73 MPs who voted against it.

Not sure why anyone is really concerned about how he votes, he's no longer leader, in fact he's not even a Labour MP. How he votes is pretty much insignificant in a parliament where the government has a huge majority.
Click to expand...

Other than the fact that everyone knows that he McDonnell and Abbot have always wanted remain to fail and if you put a truth drug on him even this is not going far enough
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,466
Just watching some of the scenes from parliament today.

Thrown under the Brexit bus. Northern Ireland, the NHS funding promise from the side of said bus, sovereignty in parts of the U.K., the Kent countryside, fishing industry, workers rights, individual rights, the promise of cutting red tape, a reduction in free trade, the finance industry. I’m sure I’ve missed some.

All for a blue passport that we always could have had and a points based immigration system that’s already being diluted to make immigration easier.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,467
chiefdave said:
Is he grandstanding? He was one of 52 MPs who abstained, he wasn't even one of the 73 MPs who voted against it.

Not sure why anyone is really concerned about how he votes, he's no longer leader, in fact he's not even a Labour MP. How he votes is pretty much insignificant in a parliament where the government has a huge majority.
Click to expand...

You’re right. I’m just frustrated he’s giving the spiel about Brexit being ‘a race to the bottom’ when his blunders have contributed to this outcome.

I genuinely like Corbyn in my Uni days, but he really could’ve done with reading some Machiavelli. Ineffective politician.
 
Reactions: Astute

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,468
Ian1779 said:
A plan to have one should have never got off the ground. Leave would have won by an even bigger margin second time round.
Click to expand...

I believe Leave could definitely have won again. There’s polls that suggest Leave would still win.

He had a the unenviable task of uniting a pro-EU, metropolitan voters and the pro-Brexit traditional working class, blue collar voters. With hindsight, failure was predictable.

His ultimate failure was a lack of coherent policy on Brexit that managed to alienate both Remainers and Brexiteers.
 
Reactions: Astute and Ian1779

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,469

Post-Brexit trade: UK having its cake and eating it, says Boris Johnson

The PM refuses to acknowledge his post-Brexit trade deal brings new barriers to trade, in a BBC interview.
www.bbc.co.uk

Boris seems to think positivity can win through. Maybe he’s right
 
Reactions: Astute

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,470
Sky Blue Pete said:

Post-Brexit trade: UK having its cake and eating it, says Boris Johnson

The PM refuses to acknowledge his post-Brexit trade deal brings new barriers to trade, in a BBC interview.
www.bbc.co.uk

Boris seems to think positivity can win through. Maybe he’s right
Click to expand...
Doubtful. The guy is in serious need of a reality check.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,471
this country is fucked, this man is an elected politician. State of it

 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,472
clint van damme said:
this country is fucked, this man is an elected politician. State of it

Click to expand...

bet that sticks to the wall without any glue
 
Reactions: Jamesimus, hill83 and Brylowes
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,473
clint van damme said:
this country is fucked, this man is an elected politician. State of it

Click to expand...
 
Reactions: Brylowes

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,474
clint van damme said:
this country is fucked, this man is an elected politician. State of it

Click to expand...

An image of a real leader - truly a thing of the past
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,475
Skybluefaz said:

Arse
Click to expand...

Of course if this bloke actually had any balls, he could have presented an alternative Brexit to the people for us to leave out of the left hand door.....and maybe engaging the youth, the disenfranchised and the working classes.....

....but no....he sat on his hands, on the fence, and watched the shit storm from the sidelines......cowardly prick.

....and now we've got a tory wank sock sir keir the nowhere man as "leader" of the opposition.....I fucking despair
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,476
Grendel said:
An image of a real leader - truly a thing of the past
Click to expand...

a cardboard cut out, in a hotel corridor. The mans lost his mind.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,477
clint van damme said:
this country is fucked, this man is an elected politician. State of it

Click to expand...
She would never have left he single market
 
Reactions: skybluetony176, Sick Boy and Brylowes

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,478
jimmyhillsfanclub said:
Of course if this bloke actually had any balls, he could have presented an alternative Brexit to the people for us to leave out of the left hand door.....and maybe engaging the youth, the disenfranchised and the working classes.....

....but no....he sat on his hands, on the fence, and watched the shit storm from the sidelines......cowardly prick.

....and now we've got a tory wank sock sir keir the nowhere man as "leader" of the opposition.....I fucking despair
Click to expand...

His failing was allowing the others in the party to dictate the Brexit narrative, not him. Not saying it was the easiest job uniting a party machine generally at odds with its voter base - especially outside of the big cities, but he should have taken decisive leadership.... at the very least refusing the plan to not honour the result.
 
Reactions: Astute and clint van damme

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,479
Astute said:
You got it

My reasoning has always come from comparing the average voter, the average Tory plan and the average Labour plan.

The average voter wants what is best for them. They say about being happy to pay more in tax but put their x elsewhere. The average Labour Party wants what is best for the poor/lower paid. The Tories announce their best parts, keep quiet on those the majority wouldn't like and expand on those that other parties have where the voters might not like and make them sound worse. There goes your policies and party political broadcasts.

The Tories won't be shouting about our future with the EU. They will condition the voters first. Once the majority wants what their aims are they will happen.

Let's go back to this last minute deal and it being planned in advance. Within a few days 27 countries got through a lot of paperwork and agreed to it. Does anyone really believe this paperwork was sorted and agreed in a few days? I am sure it was planned well in advance. Macron even put his reputation on the line in France and got exactly what he stated he would. We got conditioned to expect the worst and at the last minute got a deal.

So the conditioning will continue. The Tories will continue to let us know what their aims are. We will get most of what they say but will compromise in other areas. But we will be happy because we get what we want. Eventually we will have the vast majority of what we had previously but not in name. It will be known as 'a special deal'
Click to expand...
Fully agree with most of this.
At the end of the day the Conservative Party are just the political wing of the British establishment, always were and always will be.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #49,480
Deleted member 5849 said:
Click to expand...
Ah that’s brilliant!!
Did they get Rolf to contribute his bit whilst on a tea-break from his police interview.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,481
Brylowes said:
Fully agree with most of this.
At the end of the day the Conservative Party are just the political wing of the British establishment, always were and always will be.
Click to expand...
Tories and Labour are different to different people. This is the problem.

Long term shows vote Labour vote tax increases. Vote Tory vote tax cuts. Do you want more money in your pay packet?

All is good until things in life go wrong. Normally when you need the services that are paid for by tax. This is when most people consider the problems of paying less tax. But by then it is too late. They mainly considered the spongers who never did a days work and not those in need.

We have a great NHS. It is very expensive to run but is a lifesaver. You see people on here saying how far behind other countries our NHS is but the NHS is free. I see France called better all the time. But that is by those who don't know what they are talking about. Yes it is a great system. But it isn't free. Only basic is free. We pay €450 a month which covers nearly everything. Have an ongoing problem? Not a problem if you can afford about 1k a month insurance. Yet it is compared to the NHS.

Tax cuts v paying extra tax. Are you a gambling person?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,482
fernandopartridge said:
He abstained. The reality is less would you want no deal or this deal, more would you rather be seen to support the abysmal deal put forward by the Tories.

I find it quite bizarre that forensic genius Starmer whipped the party to vote for it when a) the tories have a huge majority, and b) the actual draft legislation only appeared a day or two ago. His first critique (if he can manage a bit of opposition) will just be beaten down with a "well you voted for the deal" and they'd be spot on.
Click to expand...

Yeah that didn’t work so well for the Iraq war. This is boris’ deal whoever votes for it. Starmer is right, every single one of those abstaining of voting against would vote for if they didn’t have the cover of adults doing their job.

It’s a total fantasy that anyone upset with Brexit is going to blame Kier Starmer FFS. Also the vast vast majority of the public remain and leave Labour or not support this strategy.
 
Reactions: clint van damme and Astute

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,483
Astute said:
Tories and Labour are different to different people. This is the problem.

Long term shows vote Labour vote tax increases. Vote Tory vote tax cuts. Do you want more money in your pay packet?

All is good until things in life go wrong. Normally when you need the services that are paid for by tax. This is when most people consider the problems of paying less tax. But by then it is too late. They mainly considered the spongers who never did a days work and not those in need.

We have a great NHS. It is very expensive to run but is a lifesaver. You see people on here saying how far behind other countries our NHS is but the NHS is free. I see France called better all the time. But that is by those who don't know what they are talking about. Yes it is a great system. But it isn't free. Only basic is free. We pay €450 a month which covers nearly everything. Have an ongoing problem? Not a problem if you can afford about 1k a month insurance. Yet it is compared to the NHS.

Tax cuts v paying extra tax. Are you a gambling person?
Click to expand...

Do you have any proof whatsoever for the tax rise/tax cut thing?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,484
shmmeee said:
Do you have any proof whatsoever for the tax rise/tax cut thing?
Click to expand...
As much as you like.

Which party is for the poorer in our community? Which party is for the rich in our community?

Which party cuts funding to those in need? If they didn't cut the funding where would the money come from?

Or are you now defending the Tories?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,485
Mucca Mad Boys said:
I get that on a level, but the alternative is no deal at all.

To be frank, the deal isn’t all that bad. Zero tariff and zero quota access to the EU Single Market without having to pay into it, is not that bad an outcome.
Click to expand...
In reality it’s very much in the EU’s favour and gives zero tariff access to the UK for import and exports on goods.

How anyone can describe it as not that bad for Britain when the Services industry is not included.

Not sure the threat of no deal was ever real, the transition could have been extended. It’s been done to get it rushed through with minimal scrutiny.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,486
Sick Boy said:
In reality it’s very much in the EU’s favour and gives zero tariff access to the UK for import and exports on goods.

How anyone can describe it as not that bad for Britain when the Services industry is not included.

Not sure the threat of no deal was ever real, the transition could have been extended. It’s been done to get it rushed through with minimal scrutiny.
Click to expand...

Gove said last night it was a great deal for the service industries even though they're not included!
I know politicians have always been liars but this mob are off the scale.

As for the zero tariff access the EU can impose tariffs and other sanctions on UK exports if they diverge from EU standards, do you know if there is any mechanism or circumstance for the UK to do likewise to the EU?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,487
shmmeee said:
Do you have any proof whatsoever for the tax rise/tax cut thing?
Click to expand...

according to the IFS the we're taxed more now than for decades when NI and VAT are taken into account, income tax is probably lower:

How the Conservatives increased the tax take to a near-record high

The steady increase in taxation since 2010 represents an ideological victory for the left.
www.newstatesman.com
 
Reactions: Brylowes

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,488
shmmeee said:
Yeah that didn’t work so well for the Iraq war. This is boris’ deal whoever votes for it. Starmer is right, every single one of those abstaining of voting against would vote for if they didn’t have the cover of adults doing their job.

It’s a total fantasy that anyone upset with Brexit is going to blame Kier Starmer FFS. Also the vast vast majority of the public remain and leave Labour or not support this strategy.
Click to expand...

I'm no Starmer fan but I don't see what choice he had here.
What he does need to do which he probably won't is go on the attack in the coming months.
We've had some absolute whoppers from the tories in the last few days, especially Gove who could potentially be PM next year, don't let it drop, keep shining a light on their bullshit.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,489
shmmeee said:
Yeah that didn’t work so well for the Iraq war. This is boris’ deal whoever votes for it. Starmer is right, every single one of those abstaining of voting against would vote for if they didn’t have the cover of adults doing their job.

It’s a total fantasy that anyone upset with Brexit is going to blame Kier Starmer FFS. Also the vast vast majority of the public remain and leave Labour or not support this strategy.
Click to expand...
You'd think it absurd that the current government still blames a government of 10 years ago for austerity but here we are
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #49,490
clint van damme said:
Gove said last night it was a great deal for the service industries even though they're not included!
I know politicians have always been liars but this mob are off the scale.

As for the zero tariff access the EU can impose tariffs and other sanctions on UK exports if they diverge from EU standards, do you know if there is any mechanism or circumstance for the UK to do likewise to the EU?
Click to expand...
The lack of a deal for Services is a huge concern for the UK and the deflection around fishing seems to have kept it out of the spotlight.

Ultimately, it’s a better deal for the EU from this angle - it’s retained tariff free access to the UK for its exports, while the UK has a 80% services economy with its biggest exporter being the EU, yet it’s not covered in the deal.

As far as I know from coverage here both sides can impose tariffs if either side has reduced standards to gain an economic advantage after it’s been shown to have diverged by an independent judicial review.

Ultimately the UK is likely to go for deregulation though in the long-term, of course.
 
Last edited: Dec 31, 2020
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1412
  • 1413
  • 1414
  • 1415
  • 1416
  • …
  • 1484
Next
First Prev 1414 of 1484 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 14 (members: 0, guests: 14)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?