skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
“I’d love it if we could be like Norway”. “Lets be clear, no one is talking about leaving the single market”.
No deal 'only acceptable' Brexit, says Farage
No deal 'only acceptable' Brexit, says Farage
“I’d love it if we could be like Norway”. “Lets be clear, no one is talking about leaving the single market”.
No deal 'only acceptable' Brexit, says Farage
Did he actually say that Tony ? (Pre referendum)
I have to say though he’s pissing me off. Does he want Brexit or not ?! He doesn’t appear to accept the fact that people in a sense voted for various forms of Brexit or that the country is approximately 50/50 even now. Therefore there should be some kind of compromise solution (Mays withdrawal agreement with the removal/replacement of backstop is probably as good as you’ll get)
This No Deal at all costs positioning is just plain wrong
When you voted remain what did you vote for? To me it was to remain in the EU. Keep to their rules and regulations. So what did those who voted to leave for? The question was in or out.Did he actually say that Tony ? (Pre referendum)
I have to say though he’s pissing me off. Does he want Brexit or not ?! He doesn’t appear to accept the fact that people in a sense voted for various forms of Brexit or that the country is approximately 50/50 even now. Therefore there should be some kind of compromise solution (Mays withdrawal agreement with the removal/replacement of backstop is probably as good as you’ll get)
This No Deal at all costs positioning is just plain wrong
When you voted remain what did you vote for? To me it was to remain in the EU. Keep to their rules and regulations. So what did those who voted to leave for? The question was in or out.
Of course there should be some kind of compromise. But would you like to point out who it is that doesn't want to compromise? It isn't the UK. I have said all along that I expect a last minute deal of some kind if it went this far.
This no deal positioning should have been done from the start if leaving was going to be the priority. But it wasn't under May. When looking for a deal in any walk of life you always start off asking for more than you want. Because a compromise is always needed in negotiations. How can you compromise when you start with what you need?
The so called May deal was all about compromise. And nobody wanted it. Not even yourself.I think he means a compromise internally between remain and leave.
If you think the EU is hard nosed just wait until negotiations with America start. Other countries will get as much as they can as they’ll know the UK will be in a distressed position.
This no deal positioning should have been done from the start if leaving was going to be the priority. But it wasn't under May. When looking for a deal in any walk of life you always start off asking for more than you want. Because a compromise is always needed in negotiations. How can you compromise when you start with what you need?
Also, you’ve bought into the Trump BS, geopolitics is not bartering for Knick knacks on holiday.The problem is in normal situations involving making a deal, not making a deal would result in keeping the status quo, which in this case would be remain, not burning your bridges like in no deal.
I keep hearing people say “you don’t tell a car salesman what car you want and that you’re going to leave with a car when buying a car” in what must be the stupidest analogy ever concocted. In this analogy no deal is the equivalent to refusing to pay the settlement of your finance agreement, leaving your previous car there and walking home in the rain.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The so called May deal was all about compromise. And nobody wanted it. Not even yourself.
Hard nosed? No. They said what they wanted and expected it because of May. And they can afford to do it as they make the rules up as they go along. If they fail to get what they want they then have another two years to come to an agreement. But the thing that so many love to ignore is that so do we. The difference is that there is unity in the EU but it seems some would like to see us crash and burn so they can say told you so. While we don't have unity the EU still sees the chance of taking us to the cleaners.
When you voted remain what did you vote for? To me it was to remain in the EU. Keep to their rules and regulations. So what did those who voted to leave for? The question was in or out.
Of course there should be some kind of compromise. But would you like to point out who it is that doesn't want to compromise? It isn't the UK. I have said all along that I expect a last minute deal of some kind if it went this far.
This no deal positioning should have been done from the start if leaving was going to be the priority. But it wasn't under May. When looking for a deal in any walk of life you always start off asking for more than you want. Because a compromise is always needed in negotiations. How can you compromise when you start with what you need?
Well now the government has asked the queen to suspend parliament - extraordinary times
Well now the government has asked the queen to suspend parliament - extraordinary times
Well now the government has asked the queen to suspend parliament - extraordinary times
Abolute cunts. How is this "taking back control"? Suspending Parliament in the name of restoring Parliamentary sovereignty.
Extraordinary. Whatever your view on Brexit surely suspending the commons is a reversion to a historic form of politics that belongs in the past. Disgusting.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The ridiculous antics of Corbyn and the other hapless crew of remainers inevitable
Autocratic government. This is an aftront to decomracy. Parliament should use every legal tool at its disposal to stop this shameful act.
The action has arisen due to the opposition parties trying to pass legislation which it itself is by our constitution undemocratic
The correct process is to bring the government down by a no confidence vote. They are attempting to get round procedure and protocol as they know they will not win the vote
Nonsense - if the government doesn't want legislation that rules out no deal then it needs to use parliament to rule it out, not stop it being debated whatsoever
Haha, "legislation" and "undemocratic" in the same sentence.
I'm certainly no fan of Corbyn, but at least he has reached out to Parliament. Those Tory rebels and others need to swallow their pride and back him to stop No Deal. It will be an absolute disaster for the UK.
I might be wrong (and certainly not trying to defend it) however I presume that if there was no deal by the end of the suspension ie 14 Oct Parliament could still try to seek to stop us leaving on 31 Oct ?
I wonder if it’s an attempt to give Johnson until 14 Oct to agree a deal and focus EUs minds.
This is our sovereign constitutional process
I think the idea is there’s no time to stop it via any means. Power removed from the commons to fulfil a project dreamt up by a few wealthy elites because they want to siphon money from a trade deal with the states.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jeremy thought he could play games been put right back in his box with this one.
Finally, a backbone shown from somebody
Which is being shut down so No Deal can pass without Parliament "getting in the way". How democratic!
Have you any concept of the sacrifice that was required to establish the House of Commons and remove power from the monarchy.
You’re an embarrassment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Have you any concept of the sacrifice that was required to establish the House of Commons and remove power from the monarchy.
You’re an embarrassment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?