stupot07
Well-Known Member
Definitely, like why did they create Ltd in 1995?
Exactly, r_b. Where are we playing?
However, when your presenting a case, you need to lay the foundation. It wasn't like he was saying "This happened in 1995 and that's that" he's saying "This happened in 1995 wheich lead to this and then that and then that and that is how we have arrived here"
Essesntially trying to join the dots. Whether he's connected the dots accurately is another matter, but that is why it is important to talk about '95.
If I was picking up someone elses mess which lead to further mess, and was being blamed for the mess in the first place, I'd certainly make it abundently clear as to how I got there and that the initial mess was not my doing.
Who knows, Willie.
The whole thing is a mess and all sides have to hold some degree of culpability.
I think the administrator will find sisu as the preferred bidder. Once that happens, the only ones who can save the club are the football league. If they think sisu are unfit owners they might refuse them the golden share. Signing off false accounts for 5 years is hardly likely to support sisus claim to being fit and proper.
There's a reason for that.
I have seen no evidence to suggest they have the spine to do that. They've too made errors and are hoping it will resolve itself and quieten down so that their errors aren't exposed.
Thanks Willie, maybe ACL should hold a forum.
The point is though we don't actually know the reason for that, because people keep shouting at him, giving him the chance to delay and respond to the simple points.
We don't know the reason for anything because we're letting him get away with soundbytes.
At the moment all these forums are doing is giving a Mad Hatter a chance to shout at him, so we may as well be back to press releases from all sides.
Well I'm expecting an ACL one today as a result of these forums.
To offer again Torchy, they can't. They have clearly stated that with the SISU initiated judicial review, they can't comment on the grounds of sub judice and the spectre of being found in contempt. I wish people would stop saying this, as they are trying to behave properly
To offer again Torchy, they can't. They have clearly stated that with the SISU initiated judicial review, they can't comment on the grounds of sub judice and the spectre of being found in contempt. I wish people would stop saying this, as they are trying to behave properly
I'm sure that will get lapped up by everyone.
Some maybe. Most are sensible enough not to believe it all to be gospel.
I think a lot of people however are picking up on the fact that both ACL and the council heavily criticise the way Sisu operate and also question their honesty.
As I've said eleventy billion times, we are just mushrooms kept in the dark.
Some maybe. Most are sensible enough not to believe it all to be gospel.
I think a lot of people however are picking up on the fact that both ACL and the council heavily criticise the way Sisu operate and also question their honesty.
As I've said eleventy billion times, we are just mushrooms kept in the dark.
Arseholes, the pair of them. People who walk out of any meeting are about as useful as a chocolate fireguard to be honest, you can only influence or do anything if you are there.
I honestly wish Fisher came across as a more decent bloke though. He just has a way of seemingly talking down to people and getting people's backs up.
Maybe we would be better off with a more sympathetic spokesperson at the helm?
Maybe Joy?
Or alternatively, that ACL lied and the doors truly have been closed to Holdings/SISU.
If you were who I think you were... you didn't leave, simple - you left as a massive grand gesture!! I must admit, I saw one of the guys come back as I was right next to the door, I smiled.
The point is though we don't actually know the reason for that, because people keep shouting at him, giving him the chance to delay and respond to the simple points.
We don't know the reason for anything because we're letting him get away with soundbytes.
At the moment all these forums are doing is giving a Mad Hatter a chance to shout at him, so we may as well be back to press releases from all sides.
I am going again on Monday
Why do people go to walk out? Just makes them look like queeny divas!
Or alternatively, that ACL lied and the doors truly have been closed to Holdings/SISU.
On what basis should ACL have an 'open door' policy to anyone other than Limited, it's administrator or new owners?!?
Given they seem to have an open door policy to anybody who isn't involved with the club in the slightest, they may as well extend that to people who are.
If everybody just got over this stupid dick waving and trying to find out whose cock is bigger than whose, and actually spoke to whoever might have a chance of owning the club next season, and might actually be involved, then it'd be a lot better for everyone.
Or we can just stick to comparing length and girth, and smirk at how we've got one over some random bloke.
No. They have a policy whereby they have engaged with any party who's looked at buying Limited. Which is exactly and precisely what they should do
Given they seem to have an open door policy to anybody who isn't involved with the club in the slightest, they may as well extend that to people who are.
If everybody just got over this stupid dick waving and trying to find out whose cock is bigger than whose, and actually spoke to whoever might have a chance of owning the club next season, and might actually be involved, then it'd be a lot better for everyone.
Or we can just stick to comparing length and girth, and smirk at how we've got one over some random bloke.
Which includes SISU.
Who they haven't engaged with.
Frankly it's all bollocks, and the only victims are us as everybody's so keen to point the finger nobody actually seems to care that it's within the power of everybody to fix it.
Since when has any other company been offered the chance to rent the Ricoh?
How do you know that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?