Nick
Administrator
He was saying the Telegraph weren't wasn't he? Not fans, it is quite clear fans have.
Apologies. Point stands though. He stated that no one was complaining before. They clearly were. The CT petition isn't the first petition centred around SISU's ownership and their ability to run the club. The march recently organised is also the third march that I know of again centred around how the club is run. Then there was the legends game that was used as a protest. Then there's the countless organised protest's holding things up in the ground, there's the organised protest that happened at the Arsenal game, there's been protest's outside SISU HQ. People have been complaining, loudly and for a long time.
It wasn't even my post he replied to you clueless idiot.
Didn't they? No one started chanting SISU out when we were relegated from the championship? No one was complaining when we were took to Northampton on a whim? We've not had any marches or petitions until recently? I think you're very wrong on that score. This has been going on for years. Some good football might have papered over some cracks temporarily last season before reality came crashing back down but lets not pretend that no one has been complaining.
He was saying the Telegraph weren't wasn't he? Not fans, it is quite clear fans have.
I was replying to the post which suggested that the Coventry Telegraph and Sky Blue Trust had been complaining for a long time, not ordinary supporters.
The post he was replying to said "The club's a mess and going nowhere, oh well let's give a load of stick to people who complain about it, like the CT and the Trust, as if it is their fucking fault...."
He talked about the mess of the club in general and then pointed out that people are blaming the CT and the TRUST. CT ran a bring city home campaign and if the trust hadn't been complaining JS wouldn't have had anything to talk about un SCG meetings for years now as we all know that the point of the SCG is to put the boot into the trust for putting the boot into our owners.
I think you're the one who missed the point. Nick spin.
They have and I've given countless examples of how they have.
Until recently, the trust haven't openly said they are anti sisu and neither have the Telegraph although it has been obvious they haven't actually said it. The Bring City Home campaign / John Terry performance?
I didn't miss the point, it looks like you still are as Dutchman has cleared it up above.
Not only can't you identify who posts you don't even read what they said.
You either have a short or selective memory. So when the trust got a threatening letter from the owners solicitors over an article they linked on their official website they weren't complaining about the owners? Was the article positive and the owners didn't appreciate the positive publicity? The two marches? Was that saying well done SISU for taking the club to Northampton?
So it isn't easier to negotiate with yourself?
That £6.50 is expensive for a cup of tea and a pie?
How have the BBC screwed up? All the data was presented correctly by them as far as I can see. The full data was presented on the website and their tool for a graphical representation shows the programme at £3 against a division average of £2.92.As oppose to thinking hey the BBC have screwed up here.
Exactly. And they did mention that it wasn't the fault of CCFC.Quite.... I wonder who we should blame?
Oddly its a FL rule that you have to produce a programme.Under the current regime I'd expect them to be extinct in a season or two.
That is an odd condition, communication has changed so much.Oddly its a FL rule that you have to produce a programme.
Exactly. And they did mention that it wasn't the fault of CCFC.
If we charged £2.99 for a program would the CET run a story saying we had the cheapest program?
I looked at the BBC article and saw that the programmes were the same as every other club in League 1 bar Fleetwood.
It's hardly supportive of the club is it?
Probably not.
I'm not saying they didn't acknowledge it, but it's a misleading headline. It's not in Daily Mail/Sun territory but frustrating none the less.
How have the BBC screwed up? All the data was presented correctly by them as far as I can see. The full data was presented on the website and their tool for a graphical representation shows the programme at £3 against a division average of £2.92.
Yep Nick and Dave criticise the CET for spinning against the club. Dave takes a CET article that is clearly quite balanced and spins it based on one line to be an anti club article. Nick agrees with him and round the irony wheel spins.
Alternatively I would say its ironic some people who spin things themselves to suit their arguments, have a go at others doing the same. I guess some will miss that though.
(Before you go off at me, this isn't aimed at you)
I wouldn't go off at you mate.
I accept the CET have an agenda. They have made it quite clear they would like the owners to sell up. They are not hiding that.
However this article is clearly not about spinning or encouraging the pitch forks it's quite balanced. The only people I feel they have a pop at are compass. Yet even in these circumstances it is highlighted as Telegraph spin.
We are really let down by the local press, both the Telegraph and the Observer. Both are poles apart, mistrusted by many, and seem to have an agenda.
We are cursed with the Leagues worst owners, and the Country's worst local press. Apparently though we are blessed with two award winning journalists, so they like to keep telling us!
Again, until recently they didn't actually come out and say they were going to be all out Anti SISU did they? They always gave it the balanced line.
Alternatively I would say its ironic some people who spin things themselves to suit their arguments, have a go at others doing the same. I guess some will miss that though.
(Before you go off at me, this isn't aimed at you)
I wouldn't go off at you mate.
I accept the CET have an agenda. They have made it quite clear they would like the owners to sell up. They are not hiding that.
However this article is clearly not about spinning or encouraging the pitch forks it's quite balanced. The only people I feel they have a pop at are compass. Yet even in these circumstances it is highlighted as Telegraph spin.
The biggest threat to CCFC is the presence of sisu in the City, Wasps have been made a threat by sisu.The biggest threat to ccfc is the presence of wasps in the City.
They've also done an article recently promoting Xmas gifts from the club shop (the CT that is, not the observer) strange Nick and Dave haven't fallen over themselves to talk about that article. I think Nick brushed it of as a slow news day article when I pointed it out to him. Anything to damage the club.
And still, it's only recently the trust have come out as anti sisu and not hiding behind the balance stuff. The same as the telegraph.Like I said. Selective or short memory. The last time JS used the SCG to attack the Trust for attacking the owners wasn't the first time was it? How long ago was the first time? So was the letter that the trust received from the owners lawyers threatening them to take a link down or face the consequences only recently? No is didn't think so.
Where did their app show us on the scale of the most expensive programs?
What app are you referring to?Have you still got that screen shot?
The raw data listed by the BBC on their website is correct. You can of course interpret things in different ways. For example:The information is based on information supplied by the BBC.
Would that be the one Nick started a thread on that I was one of only 3 people to comment on?They've also done an article recently promoting Xmas gifts from the club shop (the CT that is, not the observer) strange Nick and Dave haven't fallen over themselves to talk about that article. I think Nick brushed it of as a slow news day article when I pointed it out to him. Anything to damage the club.
No it was a different one where the they found a few things on the online store and Simon's book.Would that be the one Nick started a thread on that I was one of only 3 people to comment on?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?