Telegraph Spin (1 Viewer)

Chipfat · Oct 20, 2016

martcov said:
Who is Hannity rooting for? Bill O'Reilly?

Hannity on FOX is pro Trump, he admits it, O'Reilly on FOX is conservative and is more party than Trump, Megan kelly FOX is conserative but does not like Trump, after he slagged her off in the primary debates. But you see the pattern right, FOX, i said the majority of the media meaning 24 to 1 of the major media outlets have paid money towards Clintons campaign, so work it out yourself.

Just a snippet, if all the media was fair and balanced then the story and taped evidence of Clinton's paid people hiring groups of individuals that created disturbances at Trump events to make him out to be an instigator of violence, should be on every front page or channel. You know the only channel to air it for any length of time longer than 3 mins was YEAP you guessed it FOX. I am not saying Trump is anybody's answer but any election should be covered by all media outlets in balance, even if you watch a pro party channel, if this is not the way then its rigged in favour of 1 candidate and unfair election that all should be very scared about. Look at Bernie he got fucked by her even he said whatever i do i cant win as she house the super packs!!!!! rigged in tank as they say here..

skybluebeduff · Oct 20, 2016

Nick said:
Is it attacking the CT to point out they are making things up to push an agenda and people believe it? It isn't spin, it is things that aren't true.

Still, as long as they say SISUOUT all the time and piss themselves at the fans while they lead them along it's all ok!

Be more specific about this agenda, you're the only one I've seen say it.

eedyut · Oct 20, 2016

Jesus...this really would be embarrassing for the shabby old rag, but unfortunately it seems their majority readership are about as capable of critical thought as a cauliflower is capable of being trousers.

By the way, surely someone has noticed that Bruce, covkidsneverquit and Bob Latchford are all GMK's prize imbecile, Jim Blythe. It's like a spectre of banality.

skybluetony176 · Oct 20, 2016

Grendel said:
What do you think to the article Tony?

Haven't read it. What did you think of Tim's announcement in the new year? I bet you haven't read that.

eedyut · Oct 20, 2016

skybluebeduff said:
Be more specific about this agenda, you're the only one I've seen say it.

I would imagine the agenda Nick is sensing is something like the Telegraph going big on a campaign to save the club, when most of the damage has been done, with them in the other corner. Promoting a boycott no less, when we all know the easiest thing for most City fans to do when the going is tough, is to stay away.

We should expect more creativity and resource plumbing from our local media if we believe there is no agenda.

Skyblueweeman · Oct 20, 2016

Moff said:
They are all bullshitting bastards, and the club needs new owners, a new council, no City of Rugby, No Wasps and a whole new set of decent journalists on decent local papers.

Well when you break it down like that Moff, my Xmas wish list just got easier!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

hill83 · Oct 20, 2016

skybluebeduff said:
It's ok calling out that the CET have an agenda, and an end game, but what is it?

Clicks.

skybluebeduff · Oct 20, 2016

eedyut said:
I would imagine the agenda Nick is sensing is something like the Telegraph going big on a campaign to save the club, when most of the damage has been done, with them in the other corner. Promoting a boycott no less, when we all know the easiest thing for most City fans to do when the going is tough, is to stay away.

We should expect more creativity and resource plumbing from our local media if we believe there is no agenda.

Still doesn't answer the question, what is the agenda and the end game plan for the CET?. What do they gain apart from a few clicks? If they have an agenda then they have a plan, an outline, something to be acted upon.

eedyut · Oct 20, 2016

The agenda being, the Telegraph being a mouthpiece for the money grabbing "democratically" elected council.

skybluetony176 · Oct 20, 2016

hill83 said:
Clicks.

While you're on a roll Hill what's SISU's

Irish Sky Blue · Oct 20, 2016

Nick said:
Is it attacking the CT to point out they are making things up to push an agenda and people believe it? It isn't spin, it is things that aren't true.

Still, as long as they say SISUOUT all the time and piss themselves at the fans while they lead them along it's all ok!

I would sooner use my time and energy fighting against the group who are hurting our club. Is that Sisu or is that the Telegraph?

eedyut · Oct 20, 2016

And fucking Wasps

skybluebeduff · Oct 20, 2016

eedyut said:
The agenda being, the Telegraph being a mouthpiece for the money grabbing "democratically" elected council.

That's not an agenda, it's conspiratorial. An agenda has an end game.

hill83 · Oct 20, 2016

skybluetony176 said:
While you're on a roll Hill what's SISU's

Money

hill83 · Oct 20, 2016

Don't anyone kid yourself that if the consensus was 'sisu are ok' that the telegraph wouldn't be pumping out pro sisu stuff.

skybluetony176 · Oct 20, 2016

hill83 said:
Money

How they doing?

dutchman · Oct 20, 2016

skybluebeduff said:
Still doesn't answer the question, what is the agenda and the end game plan for the CET?. What do they gain apart from a few clicks?

They gain planning permission from the council for a multi-million pound residential complex in Corporation Street

skybluebeduff · Oct 20, 2016

dutchman said:
They gain planning permission from the council for a multi-million pound residential complex in Corporation Street

So a conspiracy it is then?

hill83 · Oct 20, 2016

skybluetony176 said:
How they doing?

Shit mate

skybluetony176 · Oct 20, 2016

hill83 said:
Shit mate

Going to have to think of a harder question.

If it takes Simon Gilbert an hour to shape his Lego hair how many Tim Fishers does it take to build a stadium?

Irish Sky Blue · Oct 20, 2016

hill83 said:
Don't anyone kid yourself that if the consensus was 'sisu are ok' that the telegraph wouldn't be pumping out pro sisu stuff.

Why would they? If Sisu were okay there would be no need for a campaign. I don't know what the CT end game is. I can't see that it will in any way harm CCFC. On the other hand their campaign does seem to have galvanised things against Sisu. Almost everyone on here says that they think Sisu are destroying our club. Therefore why undermine the campaign that is trying to get rid of them. Okay, they have shot themselves in the foot on this one. In the scheme of things does it matter greatly? Is it as bad as countless untruths from the other party? The CT seems more of a target for some on here than Sisu are. If we all agree Sisu need to go, why is that?

eedyut · Oct 20, 2016

skybluebeduff said:
That's not an agenda, it's conspiratorial. An agenda has an end game.

How is it conspiratorial? Ok, the quote marks maybe! But the council's record is there for all to see. They ripped the club off from within with the original sale of Highfield Road, then outflanked the club at every turn for their own monetary return, all before shady dealings with Wasps totally cut the cord.

The club is a civic institution, or at least should be. No matter how terrible, inept or stubborn the current owners are, let's not forget that an eternal councillor, who was deeply involved in both camps, has been deafening in his silence through all of this.

Irish Sky Blue · Oct 20, 2016

dutchman said:
They gain planning permission from the council for a multi-million pound residential complex in Corporation Street

Does that harm CCFC? If it is something you object to then raise it as a separate issue. Is the CT campaign helping to make Sisu uncomfortable? Possibly.

skybluebeduff · Oct 20, 2016

If

Irish Sky Blue said:
Why would they? If Sisu were okay there would be no need for a campaign. I don't know what the CT end game is. I can't see that it will in any way harm CCFC. On the other hand their campaign does seem to have galvanised things against Sisu. Almost everyone on here says that they think Sisu are destroying our club. Therefore why undermine the campaign that is trying to get rid of them. Okay, they have shot themselves in the foot on this one. In the scheme of things does it matter greatly? Is it as bad as countless untruths from the other party? The CT seems more of a target for some on here than Sisu are. If we all agree Sisu need to go, why is that?

Exactly mate, what is the harm to CCFC. I think Nick is trying to deflect the attention by constantly mentioning an agenda from CET without ever mentioning what it actually is. Perhaps Nick has an agenda of his own?

That's my conspiracy on it.

fernandopartridge · Oct 20, 2016

eedyut said:
Jesus...this really would be embarrassing for the shabby old rag, but unfortunately it seems their majority readership are about as capable of critical thought as a cauliflower is capable of being trousers.

By the way, surely someone has noticed that Bruce, covkidsneverquit and Bob Latchford are all GMK's prize imbecile, Jim Blythe. It's like a spectre of banality.

Yes ! It s quite obvious because they do nt write properly !

eedyut · Oct 20, 2016

Irish Sky Blue said:
Why would they? If Sisu were okay there would be no need for a campaign. I don't know what the CT end game is. I can't see that it will in any way harm CCFC. On the other hand their campaign does seem to have galvanised things against Sisu. Almost everyone on here says that they think Sisu are destroying our club. Therefore why undermine the campaign that is trying to get rid of them. Okay, they have shot themselves in the foot on this one. In the scheme of things does it matter greatly? Is it as bad as countless untruths from the other party? The CT seems more of a target for some on here than Sisu are. If we all agree Sisu need to go, why is that?

Because if they really were an investigative public journal, they really should be taking a closer look at the on-going, bizarre behavior of the local authority.

It's all about the past. Nothing's created quicker than it.

skybluebeduff · Oct 20, 2016

eedyut said:
How is it conspiratorial? Ok, the quote marks maybe! But the council's record is there for all to see. They ripped the club off from within with the original sale of Highfield Road, then outflanked the club at every turn for their own monetary return, all before shady dealings with Wasps totally cut the cord.

The club is a civic institution, or at least should be. No matter how terrible, inept or stubborn the current owners are, let's not forget that an eternal councillor, who was deeply involved in both camps, has been deafening in his silence through all of this.

Again nothing to do with the agenda Nick claims the CET has. So you think they're working with the council on this 'agenda'?

eedyut · Oct 20, 2016

fernandopartridge said:
Yes ! It s quite obvious because they do nt write properly !

Your a bafone ! Just like Nick , so dimb .

skybluebeduff · Oct 20, 2016

A thread about a fan who has flown over from the states to watch a game turned into an agenda from the CET who are working closely with the council to gain planning permission. Wow.

Irish Sky Blue · Oct 20, 2016

eedyut said:
Because if they really were an investigative public journal, they really should be taking a closer look at the on-going, bizarre behavior of the local authority.

It's all about the past. Nothing's created quicker than it.

That would be fine by me to. Therefore complain that they are not investigating the council. The fact is that Sisu are the biggest and most immediate danger to our club. Why not applaud their attempts to go after Sisu rather than belittle them, while suggesting they look at other parties too? It seems to me that criticism of the CT is used to deflect criticism from Sisu. As I said above, who are the real danger to our club, the CT or Sisu?

stupot07 · Oct 20, 2016

Nick said:
Getting pathetic now

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-fan-flies-5000-12053652

Bloke tweets he is at the game the other night as he his home for his 50th.

Simon writes he hasnt seen a game for over a year and has flown back for the boycott to try and make out he is coming over just for the boycott.

Embarrassing, writing incorrect articles to promote a boycott. Still people won't see an agenda.

- wrong

- wrong

- wrong

- He is on Twitter and speaks to city fans and the trust etc, it isn't 1920 where somebody sent him a polaroid in the post.

What a load of bollocks. I'd expect more from a local rag than that. I can't believe they have totally fabricated a story based on lies.

#clickbait

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

eedyut · Oct 20, 2016

skybluebeduff said:
Again nothing to do with the agenda Nick claims the CET has. So you think they're working with the council on this 'agenda'?

Not with, more for. But then MGN papers do back Labour governments naturally of course. I just can't see Leicester, Nottingham or Stoke-On Trent's council behaving so aggressively towards their football clubs, shit didn't Portsmouth's council loan their fan group a few million quid?

The disrespect to the club runs deeper and more historically than SISU. The only return that is evident is money, which of course is wholly wrong of a council, football club affairs aside.

chiefdave · Oct 20, 2016

How on earth has this got over 100 posts arguing about the CT when the first post clearly shows they are just makings stuff up.

Nick · Oct 20, 2016

skybluebeduff said:
If

Exactly mate, what is the harm to CCFC. I think Nick is trying to deflect the attention by constantly mentioning an agenda from CET without ever mentioning what it actually is. Perhaps Nick has an agenda of his own?

That's my conspiracy on it.

Do you really think it doesn't harm ccfc?

Yes I do have an agenda, it's ccfc strangely enough.

Deflect what attention? Pointing out things get made up is not deflecting anything, it's just pointing it out.

hill83 · Oct 20, 2016

skybluetony176 said:
Going to have to think of a harder question.

If it takes Simon Gilbert an hour to shape his Lego hair how many Tim Fishers does it take to build a stadium?

Trick question. He clips his hair on like a plastic hat and Fisher can't even build a bridge.

Telegraph Spin (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency