Yes, of course..... Have we got an "ethics committee" on this forum? No doubt if we did, the honesty of poster's statements could be tested. We could then compare the honestly of certain posters with that of certain councillors.
Oh yes it is don't you know the rules?
Yes, of course..... Have we got an "ethics committee" on this forum? No doubt if we did, the honesty of poster's statements could be tested. We could then compare the honestly of certain posters with that of certain councillors.
Wish you would keep up don't you know that most of the posters on here are from the council
Kill two birds with one stone...... See you at the next council meeting. Shall we have a drink before we go in.... We can have a chat about suppressing stories with the editor at the bar.... Oops.....
Kill two birds with one stone...... See you at the next council meeting. Shall we have a drink before we go in.... We can have a chat about suppressing stories with the editor at the bar.... Oops.....
So whenever reid has been mentioned in the last couple of days. ( bar match day)No he isn't. Where are the posts? One direct and one indirect is not "whenever he can".
You could have a chat on a football related thread.
Oh hold on
So whenever reid has been mentioned in the last couple of days. ( bar match day)[/QUOTE
was he mentioned once in a thread?
No, I'd say most have gone now. The ones from acl certainly have, they missed the pr brief of how to do it i ThinkWish you would keep up don't you know that most of the posters on here are from the council
I know the rules. No criticism of:Oh yes it is don't you know the rules?
You could join him being briefed (it wasn't the current one though, it was the one who mysteriously vanished)Kill two birds with one stone...... See you at the next council meeting. Shall we have a drink before we go in.... We can have a chat about suppressing stories with the editor at the bar.... Oops.....
How do you know he won't be interested? Have you asked him?
You could have a chat on a football related thread.
Oh hold on
Haven't you figured out yet that 95% of what is stated on here (often as fact) is supposition or speculation, or repeating someone elses supposition or speculation?
I know the rules. No criticism of:
CCC
CT
Wasps
Open season on:
CCFC
SISU
Les Reid
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
torchomatic;10066n44 said:I know the rules. No criticism of:
CCC
CT
Wasps
Open season on:
CCFC
SISU
Les Reid
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Which story, the " nothing happened today " story about RBC and the stadium? Or the " nothing happened today " story that a championship team thinks that Mowbray would be a good manager for them? Which one do I think has credence?
I prefer following the comments on the match thread when I can, or if I can watch the match, just watching CCFC. Anyway, where is the quote where I confirmed Fulham's interest in Mowbray? Or ar you going to admit you were bullshitting? Set a good example to Ann and John.
Oh of course you don't openly say if as you are not that stupid. You use implication as per the post above.
What this does is suggest their MAY be credence due to the possibility he may be a good manager for them - your frequent commenting on the Reid article on a thread which has nothing to do with the topic is very telling. It creates an impression as to which of the two has most credence and suggests the telegraph has the greater stature. Somewhat amusing given the outcome of the recent ethics review and Gilbert's absence in here,
You didn't denounce the article as I'll founded nonsense. You applied the same undermining innuendo deployed by other council stereotypes on the Pressley goes to Huddersfield thread.
You will now make a post about the fact I haven't produced a direct quote.
However, perception is you are not favourable to the CCFC cause. The circumstantial evidence is against you.
You try too hard.
I know the rules. No criticism of:
CCC
CT
Wasps
Open season on:
CCFC
SISU
Les Reid
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
So why is it open season against CCFC?
Oh I forgot if you hate the owners or don't agree with everything Les has said you hate City well your true colours have come out.
Yep, Sky blue.
Black and yellow for you it seems.
Why is it on the CT site not a single article about the team has comments in double figures yet the one about TM has 20 and the one about the new stadium 30.
Perception is reality, it all works against the club.
Black and yellow for you it seems.
Why is it on the CT site not a single article about the team has comments in double figures yet the one about TM has 20 and the one about the new stadium 30.
Perception is reality, it all works against the club.
Black and yellow for you it seems.
How do you always get on to Wasps? This thread is about Fulham and Mowbray- or maybe not. Nowhere are Wasps or their colours mentioned. LAST is a CCFC fan - whether you agree with him on everything or not. That has been confirmed time and time again throughout this saga. Yet, here you go again..Wasps, Wasps, Wasps. Are you trying to keep Wasps in the forefront of discussions?
How do you always get on to Wasps? This thread is about Fulham and Mowbray- or maybe not. Nowhere are Wasps or their colours mentioned. LAST is a CCFC fan - whether you agree with him on everything or not. That has been confirmed time and time again throughout this saga. Yet, here you go again..Wasps, Wasps, Wasps. Are you trying to keep Wasps in the forefront of discussions?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?